PRESERVE-MITRAL Post-Market Registry

February 10, 2025 updated by: Medtronic Cardiac Surgery

Prospective REgistry to Study Clinical OutcomEs of Repair of Mitral ValvEs in South Asia

The objective of this registry is to gather data on the clinical outcomes of Medtronic mitral repair products (Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty systems) in the approved intended use up to 12 months from the day of procedure

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

There is limited local evidence on mitral repair products in South Asia and a prospective post market registry will provide real world data on clinical outcomes.

Patients suffering from mitral valve disease and indicated for a mitral valve repair procedure with Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty system as part of standard of care, in accordance with the product label indications (instructions for use), contraindications, and warnings will be considered for study participation.

PRESERVE-Mitral Registry is a prospective non-randomized, non-interventional, post-market registry

The objective of this registry is to gather data on the clinical outcomes of Medtronic mitral repair products (Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty systems) in the approved intended use up to 12 months from the day of procedure

This clinical trial information was submitted voluntarily under the applicable law and, therefore, certain submission deadlines may not apply. (That is, clinical trial information for this applicable clinical trail was submitted under section 402(j)(4)(A) of the Public Health Service Act and 42CFR 11.60 and is not subject to the deadlines established by sections 402(j)(2) and (3) of the Public Heath Service Act or 42 CRF 11.24 and 11.44.)

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dhaka, Bangladesh, 1216
        • National Heart Foundation Hospital & Research Institute
    • Gujarat
      • Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, 380016
        • U. N. Mehta Institute of Cardiology and Research Centre
      • Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, 380054
        • SAL Hospital & Medical Institute
      • Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India, 380060
        • Epic Hospital
    • Karnataka
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560069
        • Sri Jayadeva Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences & Research
      • Bangalore, Karnataka, India, 560099
        • Narayana Institute of Cardiac Sciences
    • Kerala
      • Kochi, Kerala, India, 682041
        • Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Center
    • Maharashtra
      • Mumbai, Maharashtra, India, 400016
        • P.D. Hinduja National Hospital and Medical Research Centre
    • Tamil Nadu
      • Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India, 600037
        • The Madras Medical Mission
      • Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India, 641037
        • G. Kuppuswamy Memorial Hospital
    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500034
        • Care Hospitals
      • Kathmandu, Nepal
        • Manmohan Cardiothoracic Vascular and Transplant Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 95 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients suffering from mitral valve disease and indicated for a mitral valve repair procedure with Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty system as part of standard of care, in accordance with the product label indications (instructions for use), contraindications, and warnings

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with valvular insufficiency and/or stenosis and indicated for the reconstruction and/or remodeling of pathological mitral valves with Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty systems
  2. Indications and contraindications provided in the product Instructions for Use
  3. Subject is 18 years of age or older
  4. The patient or his/her Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) has been informed about the nature of the registry and the patient informed consent for study participation has been obtained prior to performing any study-related procedures from the subject or Legally Authorized Representative, as per applicable local requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Contraindications as per instructions-for-use (IFU):

    1. Heavily calcified valves
    2. Valvular retraction with severely reduced mobility
    3. Active bacterial endocarditis
  2. Aortic valve replacement as concomitant procedure
  3. Already participating in another clinical study, possibly leading to bias and jeopardizing the scientific appropriate assessment of the study endpoints

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Improvement in Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Grade at 12-months Post Procedure
Time Frame: 12 months
This is determined by assessing the level of mitral valve regurgitation using echo, in subjects at 12-months post-procedure compared to the level at baseline. The levels of regurgitation, level 0-4, correspond to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) guidelines ranging from no MR, Mild MR, Moderate MR, Moderate- to-Severe MR and Severe MR. A percentage number is calculated to reflect how many participants had an MR improvement.
12 months
All Cause Mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
All deaths occurring from any cause 12-months post procedure
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in MR Grade at Discharge and First Follow-up (3-6 Months)
Time Frame: At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days) and at first follow-up (3-6month)
This was determined by assessing the level of mitral valve regurgitation using hemodynamic performance, in subjects at discharge and 3-6 months post-procedure compared to the level at baseline. The levels of regurgitation, level 0-4, correspond to the ASE guidelines ranging from no MR, Mild MR, Moderate MR, Moderate-to-Severe MR and Severe MR
At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days) and at first follow-up (3-6month)
Improvement in NYHA Functional Class at Discharge, First Follow-up (3-6 Months) and Second Follow-up (12-months) Compared to Baseline.
Time Frame: At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6months), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
The percentage of subjects with an improved New York Heart Association NYHA functional class using a two-sided 95% exact binomial confidence internal measured at discharge, 3-6 months, and 12-months post-procedure and compared to baseline.
At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6months), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Hospitalization for Heart Failure at 6 Months and at 12 Months Post Procedure
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months post procedure
Subjects who have a non-elective hospital admission for signs and symptoms related to heart failure that results in a one night stay (i.e., where the admission date and the discharge date differ by at least one calendar day)
6 months and 12 months post procedure
Mitral Valve Re-intervention at Discharge, 6 Months and at 12 Months Post Procedure
Time Frame: At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6months), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Subject leaving the operating theater with an implanted Profile 3DTM or CG Future® annuloplasty system and later undergo any surgical or percutaneous interventional catheter procedure that repairs, otherwise alters or adjusts, or replaces the previously implanted annuloplasty system is considered a reoperation
At discharge from hospital (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6months), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Stroke at 6 Months and at 12 Months Post Procedure
Time Frame: 6 months and 12 months post procedure
Subjects had an acute episode of focal or global neurological dysfunction caused by brain, spinal cord, or retinal vascular injury as a result of hemorrhage or infarction, where the neurological dysfunction lasts for greater than 24-hours
6 months and 12 months post procedure
New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation, as Evaluated Through Follow up ECG at Discharge, First Follow up (3-6months) and at Second Follow up (12 Months)
Time Frame: At discharge from hospital, (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6month), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
New onset of AF is defined as when the subject did not present with prior history of AF at baseline nor was AF detected at baseline visit, but AF did manifest post procedure and was either diagnosed during the study visits (discharge, 3-6 months or 12 months visit) or was otherwise diagnosed during the duration of subject participation in the study. The incidence of new onset AF will be evaluated at discharge, first follow up (3-6 months) and at second follow up (12 months). This endpoint is analyzed for the Successfully Implanted (IMP) cohort and provided as a Kaplan-Meier analysis.
At discharge from hospital, (up to 7 days), at first follow-up (3-6month), and at the second follow-up (12 months)
Number of Attempts Required for Procedural Success
Time Frame: Procedure (defined as the date of the first attempted procedure through subject leaving the operating theater with an implanted Profile 3D or CG Future annuloplasty system)
Number of surgical attempts required for procedural implant success
Procedure (defined as the date of the first attempted procedure through subject leaving the operating theater with an implanted Profile 3D or CG Future annuloplasty system)
Total Bypass Time During the Implant Procedure
Time Frame: During the procedure as measured by standard operating procedures at the sites
Total time a subject is on bypass time as a measure of procedural complexity
During the procedure as measured by standard operating procedures at the sites

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Vinay Rajan, Ph.D, Medtronic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 10, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 9, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 14, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 10, 2025

Last Verified

February 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MDT16016SUR002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Disease

Clinical Trials on Profile 3D™ and CG Future® annuloplasty system

Search Similar Trials