ALLIANCE Mitral: Safety and Effectiveness of SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve - Mitral

December 18, 2025 updated by: Edwards Lifesciences

Safety and Effectiveness of Balloon-Expandable Bioprosthetic SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve - Mitral

This study will establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN X4 Transcatheter Heart Valve (THV) in subjects who are at high or greater surgical risk with a failing mitral surgical bioprosthetic valve or a failing native mitral valve with an annuloplasty ring.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, single arm, multicenter, pivotal study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

125

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Failing mitral surgical bioprosthetic valve or a failing native mitral valve with an annuloplasty ring demonstrating ≥ moderate stenosis and/or ≥ moderate insufficiency
  2. Bioprosthetic surgical valve or native mitral annulus size suitable for SAPIEN X4 THV
  3. NYHA functional class ≥ II
  4. Heart Team agrees the subject is at high or greater surgical risk
  5. The subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, and has provided written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anatomical characteristics that would preclude safe femoral placement of the introducer sheath or safe passage of the delivery system
  2. Interatrial septum or left atrium not suitable for transcatheter transseptal access
  3. Failing valve has mild or greater paravalvular regurgitation
  4. Failing valve is unstable, rocking, or not structurally intact
  5. Annuloplasty ring dehiscence
  6. Known severe patient-prosthesis mismatch or bioprosthetic valve with residual mean gradient > 10 mmHg at the end of the index procedure for implantation of the original valve
  7. Annuloplasty ring type not favorable for THV implantation
  8. Increased risk of THV embolization
  9. Anatomical characteristics that would increase risk of left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction
  10. Surgical or transcatheter aortic valve extending into LVOT that may impinge on the mitral implant
  11. Severe right ventricle (RV) dysfunction
  12. Severe regurgitation or stenosis of any other valve
  13. Need for aortic, tricuspid, or pulmonic valve intervention within the next 12 months
  14. Left ventricular ejection fraction < 20%
  15. Cardiac imaging evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus, or vegetation
  16. Myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the study procedure
  17. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with subvalvular obstruction
  18. Subjects with planned concomitant ablation for atrial fibrillation
  19. Clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
  20. Any surgical or transcatheter procedure within 30 days prior to the study procedure. Implantation of a permanent pacemaker or implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) is not considered an exclusion.
  21. Any planned surgical or transcatheter intervention to be performed within 30 days following the study procedure
  22. Endocarditis within 180 days prior to the study procedure
  23. Stroke, transient ischemic attack or neurological signs and symptoms attributed to carotid or vertebrobasilar disease within 90 days prior to the study procedure
  24. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic or mechanical support within 30 days prior to the study procedure
  25. Renal insufficiency and/or renal replacement therapy
  26. Leukopenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia
  27. Inability to tolerate or condition precluding treatment with antithrombotic therapy
  28. Hypercoagulable state or other condition that increases risk of thrombosis
  29. Absolute contraindications or allergy to iodinated contrast that cannot be adequately treated with premedication
  30. Subject refuses blood products
  31. Body mass index > 50 kg/m2
  32. Estimated life expectancy < 24 months
  33. Female who is pregnant or lactating
  34. Active SARS-CoV-2 infection or previously diagnosed with COVID-19 with sequelae that could confound endpoint assessments
  35. Participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint
  36. Subject considered to be part of a vulnerable population

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: TMVR in failing mitral surgical bioprosthetic valve
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) in subjects with a failing mitral surgical bioprosthetic valve.
Implantation of the SAPIEN X4 valve
Experimental: TMVR in failing native mitral valve with an annuloplasty ring
Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement (TMVR) in subjects with a failing native mitral valve with an annuloplasty ring.
Implantation of the SAPIEN X4 valve

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Non-hierarchical composite of death and stroke at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year
The number of patients that died or had a stroke
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score compared to baseline
Time Frame: 30 days

The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.

Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

30 days
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score compared to baseline
Time Frame: 1 year

The KCCQ is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms (frequency, severity, and recent change), social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. An overall summary score can be derived from the physical function, symptom (frequency and severity), social function and quality of life domains.

Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.

1 year
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline
Time Frame: 30 days
NYHA is a functional classification of heart failure based on how much a patient is limited during physical activity. The rating ranges from I - IV, with the lowest (I) as no limitations and the highest (IV) unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
30 days
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class compared to baseline
Time Frame: 1 year
NYHA is a functional classification of heart failure based on how much a patient is limited during physical activity. The rating ranges from I - IV, with the lowest (I) as no limitations and the highest (IV) unable to carry on any physical activity without discomfort.
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Amar Krishnaswamy, MD, The Cleveland Clinic
  • Principal Investigator: James McCabe, MD, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2038

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 18, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on SAPIEN X4 THV

Subscribe