A Novel Analgesia Technique for ACL Reconstruction

September 3, 2024 updated by: Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

A Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate a Novel Analgesia Technique for ACL Reconstruction: Adductor Canal Block With an IPACK Versus Adductor Canal Block

A comparison of two anesthetic techniques-- the Adductor Canal Block (ACB) and the Adductor Canal Block with Infiltration of the interspace between the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (ACB/IPACK)-- in patients undergoing bone-tendon-bone (BTB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10023
        • Hospital For Special Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction with participating surgeon
  • Age 13 or greater
  • Planned use of regional anesthesia
  • Ability to follow study protocol
  • English speaking (secondary outcomes include questionnaires validated in English only)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hepatic or renal insufficiency
  • Younger than 13 years old
  • Patients undergoing general anesthesia
  • Allergy or intolerance to one of the study medications
  • BMI > 40
  • Diabetes
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score IV
  • Chronic gabapentin/pregabalin use (regular use for longer than 3 months)
  • Chronic opioid use (taking opioids for longer than 3 months, or daily morphine equivalent of >5mg/day for one month)
  • Non-English speaking

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Adductor Canal Block (ACB)
The adductor canal block will be ultrasound-guided sonosite. The anesthesiologist will administer 15 cc bupivacaine 0.5% with 2 mg preservative-free dexamethasone with a 22 gauge (G)/4 inch Chiba needle to the mid-thigh of the surgical limb while subject lays in the supine position post IV sedation.
Bupivacaine will help treat pain and sensation after ACL repair
Ultrasound will guide anesthesiologist in performing the different nerve blocks
Dexamethasone will be used to prolong block duration
Other Names:
  • preservative free Dexamethasone
Active Comparator: Adductor Canal Block & IPACK (ACB/IPACK)

The adductor canal block will be ultrasound-guided. The anesthesiologist will administer 15 cc bupivacaine 0.5% with 2 mg preservative-free dexamethasone with a 22G/4 inch Chiba needle to the mid-thigh of the surgical limb while subject lays in the supine position post IV sedation.

The IPACK will be ultrasound-guided with c60 sonosite probe (5-2Hz). While laying in the prone or supine, frog-leg position the IPACK will be administered using a 22G/4inch Chiba needle. The anesthesiologist will identify the popliteal artery at the popliteal crease and move cephalad just beyond the femoral condyles at the confluence with the femur. Then the anesthesiologist will identify the space between the femur and the popliteal artery and moving from medial to lateral place the needle in between the popliteal artery and femur with the tip ending 2-3 cm lateral to the artery and inject 25 cc bupivacaine 0.25% with 2 mg preservative-free dexamethasone.

Bupivacaine will help treat pain and sensation after ACL repair
Ultrasound will guide anesthesiologist in performing the different nerve blocks
Dexamethasone will be used to prolong block duration
Other Names:
  • preservative free Dexamethasone

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain While at Rest
Time Frame: 24 hours post-block administration
Average numerical rating scale (NRS) at rest. A lower score is a better outcome. scale ranges from 0 to 10.
24 hours post-block administration

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Discharge Criteria
Time Frame: From 3 hours post-block administration on Post-operative day (POD) 0 until met discharge criteria, assessed up to 1 day
Time to meet discharge criteria utilizing the modified post anesthetic discharge scoring system. The frame represents when the measurements began, i.e. 3 hours after the administration of the anesthetic block. This represents time zero, at which recording would then begin.
From 3 hours post-block administration on Post-operative day (POD) 0 until met discharge criteria, assessed up to 1 day
Pain With Ambulation
Time Frame: 3 hours post-block administration on Post-operative day (POD) 0
NRS Pain score with ambulation & stairs. A lower score is a better outcome. Score range is from 0 to 10.
3 hours post-block administration on Post-operative day (POD) 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jonathan Beathe, MD, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 4, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

April 16, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 3, 2024

Last Verified

September 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Clinical Trials on Bupivacaine

Search Similar Trials