Four Cycles Versus Six Cycles of Cisplatin-based Chemotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (FOCUS)

September 23, 2017 updated by: Jae-Lyun Lee, Asan Medical Center

Four Cycles of Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Compared to Six Cycles: Randomized Phase III Trial - FOCUS Study -

The objective is to show non-inferiority of overall survival between four cycles and six cycles of first-line cisplatin based chemotherapy to determine the optimal duration of chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Urothelial carcinoma is the fifth most common cancer in men and seventh among women all around the world. Although a complete surgical resection with or without perioperative treatment is the most effective way to offer a potentially curative therapy to patients with these cancers, 25% of the patients initially present with locally or systemically advanced disease. Systemic chemotherapy is the only current modality that provides the potential for a long-term survival in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial disease.

Cisplatin based combination chemotherapies such as GP, GP-S, MVAC, and dose dense MVAC with G-CSF supports are regarded as a backbone treatment for patients with advanced bladder cancer on the basis of the results from previous studies.

However, there is no consensus on appropriate number of chemotherapy cycles. In phase III trial comparing MVAC with GP, patients were treated with 6 cycles (every 4 weeks) of chemotherapy. In another phase III trial comparing MVAC with HD-MVAC, there is no pre-determined number of cycles, but the median number of cycles were 4 for MVAC and 6 for HD-MVAC.

However, it is hard to complete six or more cycles of cisplatin based chemotherapy due to cumulative toxicities of cisplatin such as neuropathy and development of resistance. The median age of patients with urothelial cancer is 70 years old and significant proportion of the patients already showed impaired performance status (ECOG PS ≥2).

There has already been reported in several trials of NSCLC, which showed that 4 cycles of chemotherapy containing cisplatin has no significant differences in survival or QoL with lower incidences of toxicities compared with 6 cycles of chemotherapy.

The objective of this trial is to assess whether there is any difference in OS between patients who are treated with four cycles of cisplatin based chemotherapy and patients who are treated with 6 cycles of chemotherapy to determine the optimal duration of chemotherapy in patients with advanced urothelial cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

330

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Anyang, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Hallym University Medical Center, Hallym University College of Medicine
        • Contact:
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
      • Daegu, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Keimyeong University Dongsan Medical Center
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Chungnam University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Goyang, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Incheon, Korea, Republic of
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Kosin University Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Chung Ang University Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Hee Joon Kim
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine
        • Contact:
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Seoul National University Hospital, Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine
        • Contact:
          • Bhum Suk Keam
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • VHS Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Bong-Seog Kim
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • Yonsei Cancer Center
        • Contact:
      • Suwon, Korea, Republic of
        • Recruiting
        • St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea
    • Gyeongsangnam-do
      • Yangsan, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea, Republic of, 50612
        • Recruiting
        • Kwonoh Park
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed urothelial cancer
  2. Unresectable locally advanced (T3b, N2-3), metastatic (M1), or recurrent disease
  3. Age 18 years or older
  4. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1
  5. Not progressed disease status after 2 or 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy
  6. Adequate organ and bone marrow function for chemotherapy
  7. No history of radiation therapy, or radiation field within 25% of whole marrow would be allowed. If patients underwent radiation therapy in entire pelvis, they are excluded to this study. Patients should discontinue radiation therapy at least 4 weeks before enrollment, and the patients should be recovered from radiation therapy associated adverse events.
  8. Women should use contraceptive medication for 6 months after the end of the study or she would be post-menopause status. Men should consent with the contraception for 6 months after the end of the study or he would be infertile.
  9. Patients should sign a written informed consent before study entry.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Histologic types other than urothelial cell carcinoma should be excluded. However, urothelial cell types combined with squamous or glandular features are allowed.
  2. Patients who showed progressed disease status after 2 or 4 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy, cannot be treated with additional chemotherapy due to adverse events, or already undertook with reduced dose of more than 50%
  3. Presence or history of CNS metastasis
  4. Prior systemic chemotherapy (But prior intravesical chemotherapy or immunotherapy was allowed, and recurrent disease after adjuvant or neoadjuvant cisplatin-based systemic chemotherapy is allowed if the last chemotherapy was administered 1 year or more before the patient enrollment)
  5. Peripheral sensory neuropathy grade 2 or worse according to NCI CTCAE
  6. History of treatment with drugs of another clinical trial within 30 days before enrollment.
  7. Concomitant severe medical, surgical, or psychiatric disease or problems which can affect the results of the clinical trial or have possibilities of unexpected medical problems caused be the drug of clinical trial
  8. History of another malignancy (but treated malignancy at least two years before enrollment were allowed, and cured non-melanoma skin cancer, any cured in-situ carcinoma, clinically insignificant localized prostate cancer, or papillary thyroid carcinoma are allowed even diagnosed less than 2 years before enrollment).
  9. Pregnant or lactating women, women of childbearing potential not employing adequate contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 6 cycles arm
Patients without evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities after completion of two or four treatment cycles of cisplatin based chemotherapy (GP, GP-S, MVAC, HD-MVAC with GCSF) were randomly assigned to receive additional two to four cycles of chemotherapy (totally six cycles)
  • GP regimen: Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 D1, D8), Cisplatin (60 mg/m2 D1), every 3 weeks
  • GP-S regimen: Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 D1, D8), Cisplatin (35 mg/m2 D1,D 2 or D8), every 3 weeks
  • MVAC regimen: Methotrexate (30 mg/m2 IV bolus, D1, 15, 22), Vinblastine (3 mg/m2 IV bolus, D2, 15, 22), Doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 IV bolus D2), Cisplatin (70 mg/m2 D2), every 4 weeks
  • HD-MVAC with GCSF regimen: Methotrexate (30 mg/m2 IV bolus, D1), Vinblastine (3 mg/m2 IV bolus, D2), Doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 IV bolus D2), Cisplatin (70 mg/m2 D2), G-CSF (240 ug/m2 SC, D4-10), every 2 weeks
Experimental: 4 cycles arm
Patients without evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicities after completion of two or four treatment cycles of cisplatin based chemotherapy (GP, GP-S, MVAC, HD-MVAC with GCSF) were randomly assigned to receive additional zero to two cycles of chemotherapy (totally four cycles)
  • GP regimen: Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 D1, D8), Cisplatin (60 mg/m2 D1), every 3 weeks
  • GP-S regimen: Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 D1, D8), Cisplatin (35 mg/m2 D1,D 2 or D8), every 3 weeks
  • MVAC regimen: Methotrexate (30 mg/m2 IV bolus, D1, 15, 22), Vinblastine (3 mg/m2 IV bolus, D2, 15, 22), Doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 IV bolus D2), Cisplatin (70 mg/m2 D2), every 4 weeks
  • HD-MVAC with GCSF regimen: Methotrexate (30 mg/m2 IV bolus, D1), Vinblastine (3 mg/m2 IV bolus, D2), Doxorubicin (30 mg/m2 IV bolus D2), Cisplatin (70 mg/m2 D2), G-CSF (240 ug/m2 SC, D4-10), every 2 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5 years
Overall survival is defined as the time from enrollment of study until death from any cause (or date of last follow-up for patients still alive)
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival
Time Frame: Every 6-8 weeks, from date of enrollment until the date of first documented progression
PFS is defined as the time from enrollment of study until either first documentation of RECIST-defined disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever come first.
Every 6-8 weeks, from date of enrollment until the date of first documented progression
Tumor response rate
Time Frame: Every 6-8 weeks, assess the tumor response from date of enrollment
Tumor response rate is defined as the proportion of patients with a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) among patients with evaluable lesions for response of RECIST.
Every 6-8 weeks, assess the tumor response from date of enrollment
safety using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03)
Time Frame: Every 2-4 weeks, from date of enrollment until 30th days of last cycles treatment or initation of new regimen
Toxicity profiles will be evaluated every cycle with physical examination, vital signs, performance status, CBC, and serum chemistry using NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03.
Every 2-4 weeks, from date of enrollment until 30th days of last cycles treatment or initation of new regimen
Quality of life composite score of EORTC-QoL-C30 and EORTC CIPN20
Time Frame: 0-1 week, 12-18 week, 24-34 week after enrollment
Investigators measured Quality of life using EORTC-QoL-C30 and EORTC CIPN20 at the time of enrollment, 12-18 weeks, and 30 weeks
0-1 week, 12-18 week, 24-34 week after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jae-Lyun Lee, MD., PhD., Asan Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 23, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KCSG GU16-02

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Transitional Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on Treatment duration of cisplatin based chemotherapy

Search Similar Trials