Effectiveness and Underlying Mechanisms of Applied Relaxation as Indicated Preventive Intervention (EASY)

March 25, 2021 updated by: Dr. Eva Asselmann, Technische Universität Dresden

Effectiveness and Underlying Mechanisms of Applied Relaxation as Indicated Preventive Intervention in Subjects at Increased Risk for Mental Disorders

As mental disorders constitute a core health care challenge of the 21th century, increased research efforts on preventive interventions are indispensable. In the field of clinical psychology, indicated preventive interventions targeted to those with initial symptomatology appear particularly promising. Applied relaxation (AR) is a well-established intervention technique proven to effectively reduce tension/distress, anxiety and depressive symptoms in the context of treatment of a wide variety of manifest mental disorders as well as somatic illnesses. However, it has not been studied so far whether AR as indicated preventive intervention in subjects with initial symptomatology but no full-threshold mental disorder yet is capable to prevent a further symptom escalation. This randomized controlled trial in subjects with elevated tension/distress, anxiety or depressive symptomatology aims to investigate whether an AR intervention (10 sessions à 60 min) can (a) effectively reduce present psychopathological symptoms as well as (b) prevent a further symptom progression to full-threshold DSM-5 mental disorders. Putative mediators (physiological, emotional, cognitive and behavioral changes including heart rate and heart rate variability, hair and salivary cortisol secretion, affectivity, self-efficacy, internal locus of control and cognitive / behavioral coping) and moderators (sex, age, symptom severity at baseline and homework adherence during the intervention course) of the intervention/preventive efficacy will be additionally studied. Predictor and outcome measures will be assessed both conventionally (via personal interview, questionnaires and physiological measures during the respective main assessment) and with ecological momentary assessments (EMA, applied via smart phone over a 1-week interval following the respective main assessment) in everyday life.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
277

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Dresden, Germany, 01187
        • Technische Universität Dresden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 54 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria are as follows: at least mild symptoms of tension/distress, anxiety or depression (DASS-21 score of 8 or higher on tension/stress, of 4 or higher on anxiety, and of 5 or higher on depression)

Exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) a 12-month diagnosis of any mental disorder, (2) lifetime psychotic symptoms, (3) current psychological or psychopharmacological intervention, (4) acute suicidality

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: usual care
Experimental: Applied Relaxation
Behavioral: Applied Relaxation
10 training sessions (90 min. each) in Applied Relaxation (group format)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
primary outcome intervention efficacy
Time Frame: from baseline- (immediately prior to the 10-week intervention) to post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
reduction of tension/distress, anxiety and depressive symptoms (DASS-21 tension/stress, anxiety and depression)
from baseline- (immediately prior to the 10-week intervention) to post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
primary outcome prevention efficacy
Time Frame: from entry exam (prior to the 10-week intervention) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
rates of incident mental disorders (first incidence or recurrence of sub-threshold or threshold DSM-5-defined mental disorders; DIA-X/CIDI)
from entry exam (prior to the 10-week intervention) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
secondary outcomes intervention efficacy
Time Frame: from baseline- (immediately prior to the 10-week intervention) to post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
other symptom changes (DSM-5 CCSM anxiety, depression, anger, somatic symptoms, sleep disturbance)
from baseline- (immediately prior to the 10-week intervention) to post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
secondary outcomes intervention efficacy
Time Frame: from baseline- (immediately prior to the 10-week intervention) to post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
other clinical changes from baseline- to post-assessment (e.g. impairment, disability)
from baseline- (immediately prior to the 10-week intervention) to post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
secondary outcomes prevention efficacy
Time Frame: from post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
changes of tension/distress, anxiety and depressive symptoms (DASS-21 tension/stress, anxiety and depression)
from post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
secondary outcomes prevention efficacy
Time Frame: from post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
other symptom changes (DSM-5 CCSM anxiety, depression, anger, somatic symptoms, sleep disturbance)
from post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
secondary outcomes prevention efficacy
Time Frame: from post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)
other clinical changes (e.g. number of symptoms/diagnoses, impairment, disability)
from post-assessment (immediately after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls) to follow-up-assessment (12 months after completion of the 10-week intervention or a comparable time frame in controls)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Technische Universität Dresden

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eva Asselmann, PhD, Technische Universität Dresden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 10, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 11, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AS 497/1-1

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depressive Disorder

Clinical Trials on Applied Relaxation

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings