Pilot Study Evaluating Somatostatin Receptor's PET Imaging to Detect Inflammatory Phases of Myocarditis (DOTAMIR)

February 8, 2024 updated by: Elodie CHEVALIER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Monocentric Interventionnal Pilot Study Pilot Study Evaluating Somatostatin Receptor's PET Imaging to Detect Inflammatory Phases of Myocarditis

Infectious myocarditis are frequent, most of the time viral and can evolve to cardiac insufficiency. The diagnosis is difficult because they can mime an acute coronary syndrome. Approximately 10 % of patients with acute infarction suspected, have a normal angiography, and half of them has in fact a myocarditis, as showed studies of cardiac MRI among which some realized in our department . However, anomalies observed in MRI are not specific and it is necessary to use multiple criterions. A new radiopharmaceutical, the 68Ga-DOTATOC, specific of somatostatin's receptors which are over expressed by the inflammatory cells, has recently showed the capacity to identify myocarditis, but only in a small group of 6 patients.

The investigators make assumptions:

  1. this radiopharmaceutical is enough sensitive to detect most of the acute inflammatory myocarditis which are identified by the MRI and
  2. it could maybe allow to identify myocarditis with a persistent subacute or chronic inflammation, which are difficult to identify with cardiac MRI, and it would be a new information able to guide the medical decision.

Primary objectif: to determine if PET with 68Ga-DOTATOC is enough sensitive to identify myocarditis in acute inflammatory phase by hospitalized patients with suspected acute infarction and with normal angiography and who have a high probability of myocarditis identified by MRI. Disease prevalence will be close to 100 % at baseline Secondary objectives: 1. Estimate the frequency of inflammatory forms (subacute or chronicle), with a 68Ga-DOTATOC PET at 3 to 5 months from baseline, when classic signs of acute inflammatory generally disappeared (CRP, Troponin-I, myocardial oedema in MRI).

2. Analyze the concordance of the results of 68Ga-DOTATOC TEP by two readers

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • France
      • Vandoeuvre/les/nancy, France, 54511
        • Veronique Roch

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult subjects who have given their written consent to participate in the study.
  • Patients without history of heart disease, hospitalized for acute infarction suspected with positive troponine, normal or subnormal angiography and which have a high probability of acute inflammatory myocardities on the secondarily realized MRI (= 2 criteria of Lake Louise)
  • No contraindication to perform a 68Ga-DOTATOC-PET .
  • Patient belong to a social security scheme.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under guardianship or curatorship.
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding and woman of childbearing age without effective contraception
  • Impossibility to perform a PET with 68Ga-DOTATOC (patient agitated).
  • Impossibility to schedule PET/CT before the deadline = in 7 days since the beginning of the hospitalization.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental arm
All included patients wil receive 68Ga-dotatoc-PET/CT suspected acute myocarditis in first and an other 68Ga-dotatoc-PET/CT 6 months later
Drug: DOTATOC-68Ga PET initial
DOTATOC is a tracer of high affinity for the type 2 somatostatin receptors and is used for imaging of tumours which are expressing them, including endocrine tumours
Other Names:
  • Imaging PET/CT
Drug: DOTATOC-68Ga PET at 6 months
DOTATOC is a tracer of high affinity for the type 2 somatostatin receptors and is used for imaging of tumours which are expressing them, including endocrine tumours
Other Names:
  • Imaging PET/CT
Biological: blood sample
blood tests will be carried out during the control visit to ensure that biological parameters are normalized

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Presence of a significant myocardial retention of 68Ga-DOTATOC during initial staging. Sensibility calculation
Time Frame: at baseline
The criterion of positivity will be that of a visually detectable and quantitatively significant area of myocardial uptake, which will be defined by a measurement of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) at least 30% higher than that of the blood signal obtained at the center of the left ventricular cavity. This threshold was chosen based on measurements already published in a small pilot study.
at baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of a significant myocardial retention of 68Ga-DOTATOC during initial staging
Time Frame: 6 months

a visually detectable and quantitatively significant area of myocardial uptake, which will be defined by a measurement of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) at least 30% higher than that of the blood signal obtained at the center of the left ventricular cavity. This threshold was chosen based on measurements already published in a small pilot study.

a visually detectable and quantitatively significant area of myocardial uptake, which will be defined by a measurement of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) at least 30% higher than that of the blood signal obtained at the center of the left ventricular cavity. This threshold was chosen based on measurements already published in a small pilot study.

visually detectable and quantitatively significant area of myocardial uptake, which will be defined by a measurement of the Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) at least 30% higher than that of the blood signal obtained at the center of the left ventricular cavity.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Elodie CHEVALIER, MD, CHRU de NANCY

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 13, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 13, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 16, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 16, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 20, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-002716-43

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocarditis

Clinical Trials on DOTATOC-68Ga PET initial

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings