Computer-based Intervention for Alcohol-using HIV/HCV+ Women

December 16, 2024 updated by: New York University

Computer-based Alcohol Reduction Intervention for Alcohol-using HIV/HCV+ Russian Women in Clinical Care

The study harnessed the multidisciplinary expertise of our research team to develop a brief, computer-based, alcohol reduction intervention tailored for HIV/HCV co-infected women and evaluate its efficacy. The intervention, if effective, may be an efficient and cost-effective alcohol reduction strategy, that is scalable and can be readily disseminated and integrated in clinical care at other AIDS Centres in Russia to enhance women's health and reduce HIV/HCV transmission risk.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Women co-infected with human immunodeficiency viruses (HIV) and Hepatitis C (HCV) are at elevated risk for adverse health outcomes associated with alcohol use. Evidence-based alcohol reduction interventions for this vulnerable population are limited. To address this gap, the study harnessed the multidisciplinary expertise and experience of collaborative Russian-U.S. research team to develop a brief, computer-based, alcohol reduction intervention tailored for HIV/HCV co-infected women and evaluate its efficacy. The study was conducted in three sequential stages: (1) Adaptation, (2) Implementation, and (3) Evaluation. Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions: (1) adapted computer-based alcohol reduction intervention PLUS PLUS provider-delivered brief motivational counseling, or (2) provider-delivered brief motivational counseling. The trial design and analysis provide an appropriate conceptual and methodological framework to assess the efficacy of the computer-based intervention. The intervention, if effective, may be an efficient and cost-effective alcohol reduction strategy that is scalable and can be readily disseminated and integrated in clinical care at other AIDS Centres in Russia to enhance women's health and reduce HIV/HCV transmission risk.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197376
        • North West District AIDS Center
  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
        • New York University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female;
  • receiving HIV medical care at the AIDS Center;
  • chart-documented HIV and chronic HCV infection;
  • currently prescribed an antiretroviral (ARV) regimen;
  • medically, cognitively, and psychologically capable of study participation;
  • laboratory-confirmed recent alcohol use as detected by a Ethylglucuronide (EtG) analysis or self-reported alcohol use

Exclusion Criteria:

  • not identifying as biological female
  • not HIV and HCV positive
  • no laboratory-confirmed or self-reported
  • not willing to participate in the trial
  • not able to participate in the trial due to medical, cognitive, or psychological issues

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Computer-based alcohol reduction intervention + Clinician-delivered brief MET counseling

Brief, computer-based, alcohol reduction intervention based on motivational enhancement therapy (MET) tailored for HIV/HCV co-infected women who used alcohol.

Clinician-based MET counseling plus standard-of-care (SOC) for current substance users.
Behavioral: Computer-based alcohol reduction intervention
Brief computer-based version of motivation enhancement therapy (MET) used in conjunction with clinician-delivered MET and standard clinical care for current substance users. Modules and follow up assignments focus on key concepts in substance use, including cravings, problem solving and decision making skills. The multimedia presentation, based on elementary level computer learning games, requires no previous experience with computers.The intervention was adapted to be linguistically, gender- and HIV/HCV-appropriate for Russian women living with HIV/HCV.
Behavioral: Brief clinician-delivered MET
Clinician-delivered MET used in conjunction with standard clinical care for current substance users. The brief intervention is focused on goals, cravings, problem-solving and decision-making. The intervention was adapted to be linguistically, gender- and HIV/HCV-appropriate for Russian women living with HIV/HCV.
Behavioral: Standard of care
Clinicians ask about substance use and provide evidence-based recommendations promoting abstinence.
Active Comparator: Clinician-delivered brief MET counseling
Clinician-based brief MET counseling plus standard-of-care (SOC) for current substance users. only
Behavioral: Brief clinician-delivered MET
Clinician-delivered MET used in conjunction with standard clinical care for current substance users. The brief intervention is focused on goals, cravings, problem-solving and decision-making. The intervention was adapted to be linguistically, gender- and HIV/HCV-appropriate for Russian women living with HIV/HCV.
Behavioral: Standard of care
Clinicians ask about substance use and provide evidence-based recommendations promoting abstinence.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Women Who Test Ethyl Glucuronide (EtG) Negative
Time Frame: 3-, 6-, and 9-month post-baseline
Percentage of women who test ethyl glucuronide (EtG) negative will be estimated to evaluate the efficacy of the adapted computer-based alcohol reduction intervention condition, relative to standard of care condition. Ethyl glucuronide will be measured in urine, with a sample taken at point-of-care at baseline and follow-ups. The definition of EtG negative is <500ng/mL. A dichotomous score will be created for times 3, 6, and 9-months post baseline, with participants testing EtG negative over the three time points assigned a 0 and participants testing EtG positive at any of the three follow-up points assigned a 1.
3-, 6-, and 9-month post-baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Women Who Test Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) Negative (<= 8 ng/mL)
Time Frame: 9-month post-baseline
Percentage of women who test PEth negative (<= 8 ng/mL) will be estimated to evaluate the efficacy of the adapted computer-based alcohol reduction intervention condition, relative to standard of care condition.
9-month post-baseline
Percentage of Participants in the Intervention Group With an Undetectable HIV Viral Load Compared to the Percentage of Women in the Control Group With an Undetectable Viral Load
Time Frame: 9-month post-baseline
HIV viral load (VL) will be measured by testing blood to evaluate HIV disease progression. The measure is the number of participants with an undetectable viral load (<200 HIV copies per milliliter of blood.). A dichotomous measure is created by which any participant who has an undetectable viral load at 9-month post-baseline is assigned a 0 and any participant with a detectable viral load at that time point is assigned a 1.
9-month post-baseline
CD4 Cell Count
Time Frame: 9-month post-baseline
CD4 count will be measured at 9-months post-baseline and compared between intervention groups. CD4 is measured as the number of CD4 cells per cubic mm of blood.
9-month post-baseline
Count of Women With a Severe FibroTest Score (3-4) at 9-month Post Baseline
Time Frame: 9-month post-baseline
FibroTest, is a biomarker test that uses the results of six blood serum tests to generate a score that is correlated with the degree of liver damage. It combines α2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, γ-glutamyl transpeptidase, apolipoprotein A1, alanine transaminase, and total bilirubin. FibroTest is scored on a scale of 0-4 depending on severity: 0-1 being mild liver damage; 1-2 being moderate; and 3-4 being severe damage. This outcome presents the count of women with a severe FibroTest score (3-4) at 9-months post baseline.
9-month post-baseline
Liver Stiffness
Time Frame: 9-month post-baseline
FibroScan - imaging modality - will be used to measure liver stiffness at 9-months post-baseline and compared by intervention group. Liver stiffness is diagnosed by a medical specialist.
9-month post-baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New York University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ralph J Diclemente, PhD, New York University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 3, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 30, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 5, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00094637
  • R01AA025882-01 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified (IPD) collected in this study will be made available to other researchers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Will be shared upon request by investigators

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Request from researcher to the PIs for use explaining nature of use; use must be for research purposes; willingness to share eventual abstracts and/or publications with the PIs

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings