Comparison Between NICOM-Cheetah and Flotrac-Vigileo for Cardiac Output Monitoring.

May 10, 2021 updated by: Chang See Seong, Changi General Hospital

An Observational Study Comparing NICOM-Cheetah Versus Flotrac-Vigileo for Cardiac Output Monitoring in the Surgical Intensive Care Unit.

Cardiac output (CO) monitoring is an important tool in critically ill patients with haemodynamic instability. Traditionally, this has been accomplished using the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC). However, its use has been associated with various complications such as pneumothorax, arrhythmia, infection, pulmonary valve injury and embolism. This has led to the development of various minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring devices such as the oesophageal Doppler, PiCCO®, NiCCO® and FloTrac®. These devices however have their inherent limitations and though minimally invasive, are still not without risks to the patient. More recently a completely non-invasive CO monitoring device, NICOM Cheetah® has been introduced. Its use is based on thoracic bioreactance and it involves placement of 4 electrodes on either side of the thorax and it analyses changes in the phase of electrical voltage signal to the current applied across the thorax. Initial validation studies on the NICOM Cheetah® device revealed promising results. This study intends to compare cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® device using the FloTrac® CO monitor as a reference.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a single centre prospective observational study. 50 consecutive patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring by the treating intensivist will be studied. Data collection is planned to be carried out over 2 consecutive years. Inclusion criteria are: 1) Patients who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring. 2) Patients 21 years old and above. 3) American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1 to 4. Exclusion criteria are: 1) Patients who are not on mechanical ventilation. 2) Patients who are not in sinus rhythm. 3) Patients with allergy to adhesive tapes. Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed. Each patient will have an arterial catheter inserted as per our usual practice. All patients will have the FloTrac® connected to the arterial catheter (standard of care in CGH SICU) and the NICOM Cheetah® electrodes placed on the skin across the anterior thoracic wall. The FloTrac CO monitor is the current standard of care for cardiac output monitoring in the SICU of CGH. All patients deemed to require cardiac output monitoring will receive the FloTrac (as per departmental practice). The NICOM CO monitor involves the application of non-invasive sensor strips. In this study, it will be applied to patients receiving the FloTrac (standard of care), on top of the standard care of monitoring with Flotrac. For each patient, standard demographic and SICU data (age, gender, comorbidities, ASA score, admission diagnosis, type of surgery, cause of haemodynamic instability, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP) at the time of instituting cardiac output (CO) monitoring, use of inotropic support, presence of renal replacement therapy, presence of mechanical ventilation and APACHE II score) will be collected. Cardiac Index (CI) values simultaneously recorded by the NICOM Cheetah® and FloTrac® on a 15-minutely basis for the first 10-hour period will also be collected. These data will be automatically recorded by the FloTrac® Vigilance monitor and the Cheetah NICOM monitor and transcribed to a data entering/analysis software by the principal and co-principal investigators for data analysis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
26

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Singapore
      • Singapore, Singapore, 529889
        • Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Changi General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring by the treating intensivist

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are deemed to require cardiac output monitoring.
  • Patients 21 years old and above
  • American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1 to 4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are not on mechanical ventilation.
  • Patients who are not in sinus rhythm.
  • Patients with allergy to adhesive tapes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NICOM Cheetah®
Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed. Each patient will have an arterial catheter inserted as per our usual practice. All patients will have the FloTrac® connected to the arterial catheter (standard of care in CGH SICU) and the NICOM Cheetah® electrodes placed on the skin across the anterior thoracic wall. The NICOM CO monitor involves the application of non-invasive sensor strips. In this study, it will be applied to patients receiving the FloTrac (standard of care), on top of the standard care of monitoring with Flotrac.
Other: No additional intervention
Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed
FloTrac®
Same patient population as the NICOM Cheetah® group as described above as all patients will have the FloTrac® connected to the arterial catheter (standard of care in CGH SICU) and the NICOM Cheetah® electrodes placed on the skin across the anterior thoracic wall. The FloTrac CO monitor is the current standard of care for cardiac output monitoring in the SICU of CGH. All patients deemed to require cardiac output monitoring will receive the FloTrac (as per departmental practice).
Other: No additional intervention
Patients will be treated as per department protocols and no additional intervention will be performed

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Degree of Disagreement, %
Time Frame: 10 hours of data collected for each participant
Comparison of cardiac output monitoring capabilities of the NICOM Cheetah® versus the FloTrac®. Cardiac output defined as the amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute. Bland-Altman analysis used to compare the level of disagreement between the 2 devices, %.
10 hours of data collected for each participant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Changi General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: See Seong Chang, MBBS, MMed, Changi General Hospital
  • Principal Investigator: Louis Ng, MBBS, ANZCA, Changi General Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 5, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 5, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 3, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 8, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2017/2820
  • CHF2017.08-S (Other Grant/Funding Number: CGH Research Grant 2017)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be available to anyone else other than the investigators of this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings