Radiological and Clinical Efficacy of a Hybrid Spinal Implant ("Topping Off"): a Mono-center, Prospective Clinical Trial

January 18, 2018 updated by: Christian Herren, University Hospital, Aachen

The Use of the DTO Hybrid Dynamic Device: a Clinical Outcome- and Radiological-based Prospective Clinical Trial

The study aim is to show the effectiveness of a hybrid system (DTO) regarding clinical outcome and radiological alteration in a single-center prospective setting.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Posterior spondylodesis and monosegmental intervertebral cage plus flexible instrumentation of the superiorly adjacent segment (Dynesys DTO).

Planned follow-up visits up to 48 months with documentation of health-related outcome measurement instruments and radiological control of possible segment alteration and device-related complication.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cologne, Germany, 50937
        • University Hospital Cologne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent
  • Legal capacity
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Indication for monosegmental lumbar spine fusion (PLIF or "topping-off ") L2-S1 with osteochondrosis Modic grades I-III or spondylolisthesis Meyerding grades I-III.
  • Radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion without signs of instability

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Motor deficit
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Previous surgical intervention of the lumbar spine
  • Relevant peripheral neuropathy
  • Acute denervation subsequent to a radiculopathy
  • Scoliosis with Cobb angle greater than 25°
  • Spondylolisthesis > Meyerding grade III
  • Radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion with signs of instability (for definition, see inclusion criteria)
  • No radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion (for definition, see inclusion criteria)
  • Radiologic signs of degeneration in the adjacent segment of the intended fusion with >Fujiwara grade II or >Pfirrmann grade IV
  • Signs of instability in any lumbar spine segment other than that undergoing fusion
  • General contraindication for elective lumbar spine surgery
  • Pathologic fracture
  • Osteoporosis with pathologic fracture
  • Active systemic infection
  • Rheumatic disease
  • Disease of bone metabolism (e.g. Paget's Disease)
  • Bone metastasis
  • Local infection focus lumbar spine
  • Seizure disorder
  • Chronic ischemia Fontaine classification IIb-IV
  • Severe heart insufficiency (NYHA III-IV)
  • Blood coagulation disorder or blood thinning therapy
  • Cortisone intake more than one month in the last 12 months before randomization
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical trial in the 30 days before randomization
  • Known allergy or intolerance to the implants
  • Dependency on investigator
  • Lack of familiarity with the German language
  • Placement in an institution by governmental or juridical advice
  • Absent legal capacity
  • Pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group 1
patients with their first surgical intervention at the lumbar spine receive the Dynesys DTO device (Zimmer Spine, Inc.).
All patients receive posterior hybrid instrumentation.
Active Comparator: Group 2
patients with a previous surgical decompression but non-fusion procedure after lumbar spinal stenosis surgery receive the Dynesys DTO device (Zimmer Spine, Inc.).
All patients receive posterior hybrid instrumentation.
Active Comparator: Group 3
patients with the medical history of PLIF-/TLIF-technique and later onset of symptomatic ASD within the superior adjacent segment receive the Dynesys DTO device (Zimmer Spine, Inc.).
All patients receive posterior hybrid instrumentation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in the health-related outcome measurement instruments (ODI)
Time Frame: 24-48 months
24-48 months
Changes in the health-related outcome measurement instruments (COMI)
Time Frame: 24-48 months
24-48 months
Changes in the health-related outcome measurement instruments (SF-36)
Time Frame: 24-48 months
24-48 months
Radiological outcomes
Time Frame: 24-48 months
Radiological changes within the adjacent segment
24-48 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Device complication (breakage, loosening, etc.)
Time Frame: 24 - 48 months
Complication regarding the device
24 - 48 months
Patient-related complication
Time Frame: 24- 48 months
general and surgical complication
24- 48 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 5, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • UKKuUKA001

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spine Surgery

Search Similar Trials