Evaluation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol After Minimally Invasive Lumbar Surgery. (ERAMIS)

Prospective longitudinal multicentre observational study carried out on a population of patients undergoing minimally invasive spine surgery and divided into two parallel cohorts according to the presence or absence of a Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme.

The patient will be assessed during 4 visits: At inclusion before surgery, at D0 (day of surgery), at D1 (postoperative visit) and at M1 (follow-up visit).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

On a population of patients undergoing minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery divided into two cohorts of equal size according to the presence or absence of a Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programme:

Primary objective To compare the percentage of therapeutic success achieved in each group one month after surgery.

Secondary objectives: to compare between groups:

  • Postoperative pain intensity at D1 and M1
  • Analgesic consumption (in stages) at D1 and M1
  • Pain-free walking distance at M1
  • Surgery conditions (duration of operation, duration of hospitalisation)
  • Frequency of adverse events related to surgery (infection rate, 1 month recovery rate, transfusion requirements)
  • Emotional impact of the management

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

302

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patient population for minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult male or female (18 years or older)
  • Patient who has agreed to participate in the study and has read and signed the consent form for participation in the study
  • Patient for whom a minimally invasive spine surgery is planned: (dicectomy, lumbar canal recalibration with or without laminectomy, lumbar arthrodesis by posterior approach limited to one stage)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a contraindication to spinal anaesthesia
  • A bedridden or institutionalised patient
  • Mental deficiency or any other reason that may hinder the understanding or the strict application of the protocol
  • Patient not affiliated to the French social security system
  • Patient under legal protection, guardianship or curatorship
  • Patient already included in another therapeutic study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine with ERAS
Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine with Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)
Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine
Classic Minimally invasive surgery of the lumbar spine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oswestry Disability Index improvement
Time Frame: Month 1

The Oswestry Disability Index (Appendix 1) (also known as the Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability) is the gold standard tool for assessing functional disability related to low back pain and functional recovery after surgery. It consists of ten questions rated from 0 to 5 (from most to least favourable). The result is expressed as a percentage according to the following formula [score obtained / (maximum score)] X 100. The maximum score is 50 if all the questions have been filled in, 45 if one question has not been filled in etc..... The disability rate, corresponding to the percentage, obtained is considered minimal between 0 and 20%, moderate between 21 and 40% and severe above 41%.

Therapeutic success defined as an improvement ≥30% in the Oswestry Disability Index between initial and final visit is the primary endpoint

Month 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: Day 1
The intensity of the pain will be assessed using a simple numerical scale (ENS) graduated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Day 1
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: Month 1
The intensity of the pain will be assessed using a simple numerical scale (ENS) graduated from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable).
Month 1
Consumption of level I, II and II analgesics
Time Frame: Day 1
Consumption of level I, II and II analgesics. Count of treatments
Day 1
Consumption of level I, II and II analgesics
Time Frame: Month 1
Consumption of level I, II and II analgesics
Month 1
Pain-free walking perimeter
Time Frame: Month 1
Measurement in meters of the distance the patient travels until he/she is forced to stop due to pain
Month 1
Evolution of Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) scale score and sub-scores
Time Frame: Month 1

The emotional impact of the disease will be more precisely evaluated by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaire, a screening tool for the most common manifestations of anxiety and depressive disorders to be completed by the patient. The scale comprises 14 questions, with 7 items assessing anxiety and 7 items assessing depression.

A minimum score of 10 on one of the sub-scores was retained as a criterion for detecting depressive or anxious manifestations. The HAD questionnaire will be completed by the patient at the inclusion visit (V1) and at the end of the study (V4).

Month 1
Duration of intervention
Time Frame: Day 1
Duration of the surgery in hours
Day 1
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Month 1
Length of hospital stay in days
Month 1
Adverse events related to surgery
Time Frame: Month 1
All adverse events related to surgery will be collected and compared in the 2 groups
Month 1
Visual Analogue Scale overall patient satisfaction
Time Frame: Month 1
The patient's satisfaction with his or her treatment and results will be assessed at the end of the study on a visual analogue scale graduated from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 10 (very satisfied).
Month 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arthur ANDRE, MD, Clinique Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 16, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2020-A02669-30

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spine Surgery

Clinical Trials on ERAS

3
Subscribe