Comparison of the Onset Times and Durations of Actions of Different Local Anesthetic Mixture Solutions [CODLAM] (CODLAM)

March 11, 2018 updated by: University of Pecs

Comparison of the Onset Times and Durations of Actions of Different Local Anesthetic Mixture Solutions Used for Ultrasound-guided Axillary-supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Blocks for Upper Limb Trauma Surgery

Objective To investigate the onset times and duration of local anesthetic mixture solutions used for axillary-supraclavicular brachial plexus blocks and to compare the quality of anesthesia in patients with trauma of the upper limb.

Design Randomized-prospective, observational study. Setting Perioperative, Trauma Clinic, University of Pecs, Hungary. Participants 85 consecutive, unpremedicated ASA physical status I-III patients, between the ages of 19 and 83, scheduled for trauma surgery of the hand and forearm.

Interventions Patients assigned to four groups for standardized ultrasound guided axillary-supraclavicular block with lidocaine 1% and bupivacaine 0,5% 1:1 mixture (Group LB, n = 17) or bupivacaine 0.33% (Group BS, n = 14) or lidocaine 0,66% (Group LS, n = 14) or bupivacaine 0.5% and lidocaine 1% 2:1 mixture (Group BL, n = 40). Total target volume of 0.4 ml/kg was administered to both groups.

Measurements Data were collected on patient demographics, the onset times and the duration of actions of local anesthetic mixtures were measured, the tourniquet discomfort, vital parameters, pre and postoperative verbal numeric rating scale of pain intensity, anxiolytic/analgesic consumption and the complications were recorded. The quality of anesthesia was assessed by a sensory-motor-coping-pain scale (0-16).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Total of 93 American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) I-III consecutive adult patients aged between 19 and 83 years old scheduled for elective or emergency trauma surgery of hand and forearm under ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block (UG BPB) between 17.01. and 15.08. in 2017 were assigned to this randomized-prospective observational study after approval by the University Research Ethics Board. Patients were excluded if continuous peripheral nerve catheter technique or bilateral block was planned, or the patient refused to participate. Exclusion criteria included psycho-mental conditions interfering with consent or assessment; pre-existing chronic pain condition or daily analgesic or sedative consumption; sedative or analgesic premedication; pre-existing neurological disorders affecting the brachial plexus (BP); obstructive sleep apnea; contraindications to BPB including local skin infections or allergy to local anesthetic (LA) agents. After exclusion, eligible patients for the study were randomized to four LA mixture solution groups and analyzed and presented in a Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials flow diagram. Standardized UG axillary-supraclavicular (AX-SC) approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. The standardized dose was 0.4 ml/kg, the targeted maximized single shot volume was 30 ml. After administration of LA, standard anesthesia monitoring was started in the operating room. Data were collected as baseline (T0); intraoperative mean values (Top); postoperative values straight after surgery (Tpop); 6 and 24 after surgery (T6; T24) including measurement of heart rate (HR), non-invasive arterial blood pressure (NIBP), and verbal numeric rate (VNR, 11 point scale) of pain intensity. The extent of sensory and motor blockade was assessed meticulously in the corresponding region after the total dose of LA was injected until the blockade was defined as completed. Sensory block was tested by pinching and touching the skin of the arm and hand at the areas innervated by the four nerves. A von Frey filament with a standard target force of 10 gr (Touch Test ® Sensory Evaluator, Red 5,07; USA) was used for the assessment of the loss of protective sensation. The outcome quality and success rate of BPB was assessed by a composite tool designed for evaluating the loss of sensory (S, 0-4: failed to excellent), motor function (M, 0-4: failed to excellent), the coping of the patient (C, 0-4: failed to excellent) and the postoperative pain at the end of surgery and 24 h after (P, 0-4: pain before the end of surgery to long-lasting - 24 h - analgesia). The overall quality of PNB was evaluated by independent examiners, based on the aggregate 0-16 point scale. Under 7 Point the block was defined as failed, 8-11 = Tolerable; 12-13 = Good; 14-16 = Excellent. The duration of anesthesia was defined as the time between the end of the LA injection for BPB and the return of the sensory function reported by the patient or the necessity for first analgesic medication.

The study was conducted comparing the onset times and the duration of sensory effects of the same volumes of lidocaine-bupivacaine 1:1 mixture (LB), bupivacaine in normal saline (BS), lidocaine in normal saline (LS), and bupivacaine-lidocaine 2:1 mixture (BL) for BPB. Midazolam and fentanyl consumption were analyzed in the four groups, the outcome quality of blocks, vital parameters, visual numeric rate (VNR) of pain intensity values and non-steroid analgesic consumptions were compared between the four groups.

The IBM SPSS Statistics (Windows, version 24, 2016) was used in our analyses. Paired samples t-test, Kruskal-Wallis test combined with the Mann-Whitney U test for post hoc testing were used in analyzing the ordinal data. The Chi-square test was used for comparison of the categorical variables between the groups. ANOVA combined with Bonferroni post hoc test was used in analyzing the variance of linear data between groups. P<0.05 was considered significant.

Priori power calculation was performed by GPower 3.1.9.2 version: effect size f=0.4, alfa err=0.05; power=0.85; number of groups=4; total sample size=84.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
85

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 83 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • elective or emergency trauma surgery of hand or forearm
  • consented to ultrasound-guided BPB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • continuous peripheral nerve catheter technique or bilateral block was planned
  • the patient refused to participate
  • psycho-mental conditions interfering with consent or assessment
  • pre-existing chronic pain condition or daily analgesic or sedative consumption
  • sedative or analgesic premedication
  • pre-existing neurological disorders affecting the brachial plexus
  • obstructive sleep apnea
  • contraindications to PNB including local skin infections or allergy to LA agents.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: LB Group
Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for LB Group (15 ml lidocaine 1% + 15 ml bupivacaine 0.5%)
Drug: brachial plexus block for LB Group
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Other Names:
  • Lidocain-Egis 1% Bucain Actavis 5 mg/ml,1:1
Active Comparator: BS Group
Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for BS Group (20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 ml normal saline)
Drug: brachial plexus block for BS Group
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Other Names:
  • Bucain Actavis 5 mg /ml
Active Comparator: LS Group
Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for LS Group (20 ml lidocaine 1% + 10 ml normal saline)
Drug: brachial plexus block for LS Group
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Other Names:
  • Lidocain Egis 1%
Active Comparator: BL Group
and Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block for BL Group (20 ml bupivacaine 0.5% + 10 ml lidocaine 1%)
Drug: brachial plexus block for BL Group
Standardized UG AX-SC approach to the BP was performed under sterile conditions by the same anesthesiologist. SC block was performed with the traditional in-plane, single injection cluster approach, then AX approach was performed in the supine position, with a standardized dose of 0.4 ml/kg BW
Other Names:
  • Bucain Actavis 5 mg/ml, Lidocain-Egis 1% 2:1

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
onset time
Time Frame: 0-30 minutes
Complete sensory block was defined by loss of sensation of filament prick and touch on all four nerve distribution. Complete motor block was defined by the loss of thumb abduction, thumb adduction, thumb opposition, and flexion at elbow.
0-30 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
duration of action
Time Frame: 1-22 hours
The duration of anesthesia was defined as the time between the end of the LA injection for BPB and the return of the sensory function reported by the patient or the necessity for first analgesic medication.
1-22 hours
The outcome quality of BPB.
Time Frame: 24-48 hours
The outcome quality was assessed by a composite tool designed for evaluating the loss of sensory (S, 0-4: failed to excellent), motor function (M, 0-4: failed to excellent), the coping of the patient (C , 0-4: failed to excellent) and the postoperative pain at the end of surgery and 24 h after (P, 0-4: pain before the end of surgery to long-lasting - 24 h - analgesia).
24-48 hours
Success rate of BPB.
Time Frame: 3-14 days
The rate of Excellent, Good, Tolerable and Failed in the four groups. The overall quality of PNB was evaluated by independent examiners, based on the aggregate 0-16 point scale. Under 7 Point the block was defined as failed, 8-11 = Tolerable; 12-13 = Good; 14-16 = Excellent.
3-14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pecs

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Medical University of Pecs

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Lajos Bogar, Prof, Department of Anesth.and Int Care,University of Pecs, Medical School

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 17, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 15, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 13, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 6940

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Injury Arm

Clinical Trials on brachial plexus block for LB Group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings