Post-chemotherapy Symptom Management SMART

September 25, 2023 updated by: University of Arizona

Post-chemotherapy Symptom Management: Testing Intervention Sequences in a SMART Design

Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years were interviewed at baseline and stratified as high or low need for symptom management based on comorbidity and depressive symptoms.

High need survivors were randomized initially to the 12-week Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH, N=282) or 12-week SMSH Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC, N=93) added during weeks 1-8. After 4 weeks of the SMSH alone, non-responders on depression were re-randomized to continue with SMSH alone (N=30) or add TIPC (N=31).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Nearly 15.5 million Americans have survived cancer and virtually all have experienced symptoms from cancer treatment. Numerous symptom management interventions have been tested during active treatment, yet few have addressed the continuing fatigue, pain, depression, etc. that endure following the end of treatment.

Existing post-treatment symptom management research has targeted survivors months after the end of active treatment, overlooking the immediate post-treatment period. During this period, some survivors have their symptoms resolve naturally (low need for intervention), while others suffer from high symptom burden (high need for intervention), with 30% experiencing depression. Sample: Survivors of solid tumors (N=451) who completed curative intent chemotherapy for a solid tumor within the past 2 years.

Design: The SMART design incorporates two interventions with proven efficacy and addresses heterogeneity of survivors' responses by following the clinical logic of starting with one intervention, assessing its success, and continuing it when effective. High need survivors will be initially randomized to receive 1) weekly symptom assessment with referral for elevated symptoms to a printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH) or 2) a more intensive intervention adding Telephone Interpersonal Counselling (TIPC) to the SMSH. After 4 weeks, non-responders to SMSH alone on depression were re-randomized to continue SMSH for 8 more weeks to allow for symptom resolution, or TIPC added for the remaining 8 weeks.

The primary outcome was symptom severity index, secondary outcome was depressive symptoms. The hypotheses tests included comparisons of primary and secondary outcomes according tp first randomization and second randomization for non-responders.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
498

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85004
        • Cancer Center at St. Joseph's
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85721
        • University of Arizona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Survivors must have a new diagnosis or localized recurrence of solid tumor cancer
  • Be finishing curative intent adjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation, and do not have any subsequent cancer treatments planned, except for radiation therapy, hormonal therapy or trastuzumab for breast cancer.
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Have access to a telephone
  • Understand English or Spanish
  • Are not currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of a psychotic disorder in medical record verified by the recruiter
  • Nursing home resident
  • Bedridden
  • Currently receiving counseling and/or psychotherapy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Low Need Benchmark or Follow-up
In the low need benchmark or follow-up group, survivors completed detailed baseline and 13-week assessments (about 30-40 minutes) over the telephone. A brief assessment (about 5 minutes) at week 4 over the telephone was used to assess symptoms.
Experimental: High Need A: Start with SMSH alone for 4 weeks
Participants were mailed the printed Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMH). The Group A participant was called every week for 4 weeks to ask about symptoms and suggest strategies from the SMH to relieve symptoms. After 4 weeks, participants were re-randomized to continue in SMH for 8 more weeks or to add Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC) Intervention for the subsequent 8 weeks. If the TIPC was added, the counselor called the participant once per week for about 35-40 minutes to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At week 13, the participant completed the second assessment.
Behavioral: Start with SMSH alone
See arm/group descriptions
Experimental: High Need B: Start with SMSH+TIPC
Participants were called every week for the first 8 weeks using a combination of TIP-C and SMH. The counselor called to assess and discuss interpersonal relationships, communication, social support, managing symptoms and survivorship. At the end of 8 weeks, the final 4 calls followed the SMSH alone protocol. At week 13, the second assessment was conducted.
Behavioral: Start with SMSH+TIPC
See arm/group descriptions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization
Time Frame: Weeks 1-13
Symptoms were measured using the modified General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) allowing for a quick assessment of 18 symptoms: fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, headache, difficulty concentrating, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, numbness or tingling, skin rashes or sores, swelling, weakness, shortness of breath, cough, depression, and anxiety. Respondents indicated the severity of each symptom (0 = not present to 10 = worst possible). A summed symptom severity index for 17 symptoms other than depression was averaged over weeks 1-13 from each weekly contact, baseline, and 13-week interviews. Potential range 0-170, with higher score indicating worse outcome (greater severity). Because the collection of symptoms does not form a scale, internal consistency reliability was not applicable.
Weeks 1-13
Symptom Severity Index- Comparison of Two Groups Created by Second Randomization
Time Frame: Weeks 5-13
Symptoms were measured using the modified General Symptom Distress Scale (GSDS) allowing for a quick assessment of 18 symptoms: fatigue, sleep difficulties, pain, headache, difficulty concentrating, lack of appetite, nausea, vomiting, constipation, diarrhea, numbness or tingling, skin rashes or sores, swelling, weakness, shortness of breath, cough, depression, and anxiety. Respondents indicated severity of each symptom (0 = not present to 10 = worst possible). A summed symptom severity index for 17 symptoms other than depression was averaged over weeks 5-13 from each weekly contact, baseline, and 13-week interviews. Potential range 0-170, higher value reflect worse outcome (greater symptom severity). Because the collection of symptoms does not form a scale, internal consistency reliability was not applicable.
Weeks 5-13

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive Symptoms- Comparison of Two Groups Created by First Randomization.
Time Frame: Week 13
Measured using Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) 20-item scale. Potential score range is 0-60. Higher scores indicated worse outcome (higher depressive symptoms).
Week 13
Depressive Symptoms - Comparison of Two Groups Created by Second Randomization
Time Frame: Week 13
Measured using Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D) 20-item scale. Potential score range is 0-60. Higher scores indicated worse outcome (higher depressive symptoms).
Week 13

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Arizona

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Michigan State University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Terry Badger, PhD, University of Arizona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 3, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 3, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 30, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 11, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 19, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 25, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1711069340
  • R01CA225615 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

We will share the findings and data with other researchers, the public, and key stakeholders based on the principles that NIH has articulated regarding the sharing of study results and resources. The University of Arizona agrees that data sharing is essential for expedited translation of research results into knowledge, products, and procedures to improve health.

Sharing of study results Manuscript based on results from the proposed study will be published in peer-reviewed journals. We will select "open access" options for these manuscripts whenever possible.

Data Sharing Data from this study will be available to other researchers under the following conditions: 1) appropriate human subjects protection is in place; 2) data have been de-identified; and 3) study investigators have publicly presented and published key findings. Data and safety monitoring plan is described under Human Subjects.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Anticipate later part of 2022

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data Sharing Data from this study will be available to other researchers under the following conditions: 1) appropriate human subjects protection is in place; 2) data have been de-identified; and 3) study investigators have publicly presented and published key findings. Data and safety monitoring plan is described under Human Subjects.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cancer

Clinical Trials on Start with SMSH alone

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings