Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprotheses. The 'LYTEN' Trial

March 23, 2026 updated by: Josep Rodes-Cabau, Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec

Comparison of the Balloon-Expandable Edwards Valve and Self-Expandable CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO System for the Treatment of Small, Severely Dysfunctional Surgical Aortic Bioprotheses: A Pilot Prospective Randomized Trial. The 'LYTEN' Trial

The treatment with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) of patients with small (≤23mm) surgical bioprostheses remains a challenge due to the increased transvalvular residual gradients and high rates of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) following the procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized open-label trial including patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction in the presence of a small (≤23mm; inner diameter ≤21 mm) stented surgical valve. Following the Heart Team'S decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will be randomized to either receive an Edwards (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) valve or a CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO system. New iterations of these valve models may also be included.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1V 4G5
        • IUCPQ

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with surgical aortic bioprosthetic dysfunction defined as severe aortic stenosis and/or regurgitation approved for a ViV procedure by the Heart Team
  • Stented surgical valves.
  • Small (≤23mm) surgical valve

Exclusion Criteria:

- Stentless or sutureless surgical valves

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: SAPIEN
Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will received an Edwards (SAPIEN XT or SAPIEN 3) valve.
Procedure: TAVI_ViV procedure with Edwards valve
The TAVR procedure will be performed following the standards of each participating center. No restriction or specific recommendation will be given regarding the approach, general vs. local anesthesia, imaging guidance during the TAVI procedure, and post-procedural TAVI management. The decision for selecting either a 20 or 23mm Edwards valve will be based on 3D CT measurements of the mean inner diameter of the surgical aortic bioprosthesis. A 23mm Sapien 3 valve will be recommended if the inner diameter is >18 mm, and a 20mm valve will be selected if the mean inner diameter is ≤18 mm.
Other: COREVALVE
Following the Heart Team's decision to proceed with a TAVI-ViV procedure, patients will received the CoreValve Evolut R or Evolut PRO valve system.
Procedure: TAVI_ViV procedure with CoreValve system
The TAVR procedure will be performed following the standards of each participating center. No restriction or specific recommendation will be given regarding the approach, general vs. local anesthesia, imaging guidance during the TAVI procedure, and post-procedural TAVI management. A 23mm valve will be recommended in all patients randomized to the self-expanding CoreValve Evolut R system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (valve performance)
Time Frame: 30 days
Severe prothesis-patient mismatch (PPM) (defined as an index aortic valve area ≤0.65 cm2/m2) and/or moderate-severe aortic regurgitation (AR) (VARC-2 definition).
30 days
Residual transvalvular gradient
Time Frame: 30 days
Residual (maximal and mean) transvalvular gradient.
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transvalvular gradient.
Time Frame: 1-year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Maximal and mean transvalvular gradient
1-year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Valve performance : Moderate or severe PPM moderate-severe AR at 30 days and 1 year.
Time Frame: 30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Moderate or severe PPM; moderate-severe AR.
30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Combined endpoints: Moderate-severe AR or severe PPM at 1-year follow-up.
Time Frame: 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Moderate-severe AR or severe PPM.
1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Clinical safety endpoints
Time Frame: 30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
individually and combined: death, stroke, major or life threatening bleeding, pacemaker implantation, myocardial infarction.
30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Exercise capacity
Time Frame: 30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Exercise capacity as evaluated by the six-minute walk test
30 days, 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Changes in LV hypertrophy
Time Frame: 30 days , 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up
Changes in LV hypertrophy
30 days , 1 year and yearly thereafter up to 10-year follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Josep Rodés-Cabau, MD, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec, University Laval

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 22, 2022

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 8, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 9, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • LYTEN

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings