Dual Guidance Structure for Evaluation of Patients With Unclear Diagnosis in Centers for Rare Diseases (ZSE-DUO)

December 6, 2023 updated by: Wuerzburg University Hospital

Duale Lotsenstruktur Zur Abklärung Unklarer Diagnosen in Zentren für Seltene Erkrankungen

In people suffering from a rare disease the diagnostic process and the confirmation of a final diagnosis is often ongoing for many years. Factors contributing to delayed diagnosis include the limited knowledge of health care professionals about rare diseases and their symptoms but also a psychiatric or psychosomatic (co-)morbidity obscuring the symptoms of the rare disease. The project ZSE-DUO will evaluate whether a combination of an expert in somatic medicine and a psychiatric/psychosomatic specialist will increase the rate of assured diagnoses in patients approaching a center of rare diseases (primary outcome), accelerate the process until a diagnosis is made, reduce the costs of diagnosing a patient, and lead to a higher satisfaction of patients and health care professionals. Furthermore, the project will evaluate whether the use of psychosomatic screening tools at registration of a patient in a center for rare diseases will help to guide the diagnostic process. Two cohorts of 682 patients each will be sequentially recruited over 9 plus 9 months: the Control group cohort (CG based on somatic expertise) and the Experimental group cohort (EG combined psychosomatic/somatic expertise Included will be persons from the age of at least 12 years presenting with symptoms and signs which are not explained by current diagnoses (as judged by the patient's primary care physician and a specialized physician at the center for rare diseases ZSE evaluating the medical records). Patients will be recruited from 11 German Centers for Rare Diseases associated with University hospitals in the cities of Aachen, Bochum, Frankfurt, Hannover, Magdeburg, Mainz, Münster, Regensburg, Tübingen, Ulm and Würzburg. Recruitment will be supported by a collaboration with the German patient organization representing many rare disease organizations ACHSE e.V. and a collaboration with the insurance companies Techniker Krankenkasse, IKK gesund plus and AOK Hessen who also provide data on costs of care. Data collection and analysis will be coordinated and performed by the Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biometry at the University of Würzburg, the Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Science of Health Care Systems in Hannover, and the Department of Medical Psychology in Hamburg. The project is funded by the Innovationsfond of the Federal Joint Committee in Germany.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1379

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Stefanie Draxler
  • Phone Number: +49 931 201 27729
  • Email: draxler_s@ukw.de

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Center for Rare Diseases ZSEA, University Hospital
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • Center for Rare Diseases CeSER, St. Josef Hospital
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • LWL-Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 60590
        • Center for Rare Diseases FRZSE, UNiversity Hospital
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Center for Rare Diseases, Hannover Medical School
      • Magdeburg, Germany
        • Center for Rare Diseases MKSE, Otto von Guericke University
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Center for Rare Diseases, Medical Center
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
        • Center for Rare Diseases, University Hospital
      • Regensburg, Germany, 93053
        • Center for Rare Diseases ZSER, University Hospital
      • Tuebingen, Germany, 72076
        • Center for Rare Diseases, University Hospital
      • Ulm, Germany, 89075
        • Center for Rare Diseases, University Hospital
    • Bavaria
      • Würzburg, Bavaria, Germany, 97080
        • Center for Rare Diseases ZESE, University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first contact with the Center for Rare Diseases for unclear diagnosis
  • suspicion of a rare disease but no established diagnosis
  • attending the Center for Rare Diseases as an outpatient
  • written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • age <12 years
  • incomplete medical records including summary letters, imaging studies, blood tests etc.
  • pre-diagnosed disease(s) explaining all symptoms

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Usual care
Standard evaluation process for patients approaching a center for rare diseases with an unclear diagnosis. The process includes the evaluation of complete medical records byan experienced physician, an outpatient visit to the center, and case discussion between experts. The process may also include an inpatient stay, a local case conference and a case conference between centers for rare diseases from different cities
Experimental: New Innovative Care
The innovative evaluation process includes the additional involvement of a psychiatrists/psychosomatic expert in all of the processes described for the usual care arm plus the option to use telemedicine in the process of evaluation in addition to outpatient and inpatient visits and to transfer the patient back into standard care (i.e., primary care physician, rehabilitation, psychological/psychosomatic specialized care, etc.)
Other: dual expert guidance structure
Two medical experts, one somatic specialist and one psychiatrist/psychosomatic specialist see all medical records and the patients together

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Diagnoses made
Time Frame: 12 months after signing the consent form
The number of diagnoses explaining the symptomatology of the patient made during the evaluation process
12 months after signing the consent form

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to diagnosis
Time Frame: 12 months after signing the consent form
The time it takes to make a diagnosis
12 months after signing the consent form
Patient satisfaction with diagnostic process using ZUF-8
Time Frame: 12 months after signing the consent form
The patients' satisfaction with the diagnostic process is assessed in the total sample with the questionnaire ZUF-8 (Fragebogen zur Patientenzufriedenheit - patient satisfaction questionnaire) and in a randomly selected subsample of about 40 patients by structured telephone interviews.
12 months after signing the consent form
Costs of the diagnostic process
Time Frame: up to 12 months after signing the consent from
estimated costs from first contact with the center for rare diseases until a diagnosis explaining the symptoms has been established
up to 12 months after signing the consent from
Patients' quality of life using EQ-5D and SF12 (or KIDSCREEN-10 for children)
Time Frame: 12 months after signing the consent from
Change in the patients' quality of life as assessed with the Quality of life questionnaires EQ-5D from the EuroQoL Group in all patients and Short Form 12 (SF-12) in patients 16 years and older. In patients younger than 16 years, the health-related quality of life questionnaire for children and adolescents KIDSCREEN-10 is used.
12 months after signing the consent from
Physician satisfaction with new form of care using new questionnaire
Time Frame: 30 months after the project start (end of the intervention period)
The satisfaction of physicians working in the Centers fro Rare Diseases with the new form of care compared to standard care will be assessed by a newly developed questionnaire administered to all physicians involved in patient care in the 11 centers. For the development of the questionnaire, 3 focus groups of 10 physicians each will be questioned.
30 months after the project start (end of the intervention period)
Value of screening instruments for psychiatric-psychosomatic (co-)morbidities
Time Frame: 30 months after the project start (end of intervention period)
Performance of screening tools to identify patients with psychiatric-psychosomatic comorbidities against the judgement of a psychiatrist/psychosomatic expert seeing the patient (intervention group only)
30 months after the project start (end of intervention period)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Wuerzburg University Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Hannover Medical School
Goethe University
University Hospital Tuebingen
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
University of Wuerzburg
University Hospital Ulm
Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
University Hospital Regensburg
University Hospital, Aachen
St. Josef Hospital Bochum
Techniker Krankenkasse
University Medical Center Mainz
AOK Hessen
Allianz Chronischer Seltener Erkrankungen ACHSE e.V.
IKK gesund plus
LWL-Universitätsklinikum der Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Universität Münster

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 15, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZSE-DUO_V1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings