Neural Mechanism of Vision Therapy for Patients With Convergence Insufficiency

February 24, 2020 updated by: Dr. Tara Lynn Alvarez, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Functional Neural Mechanism of Vision Therapy for Patients With Convergence Insufficiency

Convergence insufficiency (CI) is a prevalent binocular vision disorder with symptoms that include double/blurred vision, eyestrain, and headaches when engaged in reading or other near work. CI is present in 4% of the population where approximately 27% of CI patients do not improve even with validated therapy. The project will quantitatively study changes in convergence eye movements and neural substrates before and after validated therapy in CI patients. This knowledge can lead to improvements in currently validated therapy, reduction in therapy sessions, and reduced healthcare costs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Convergence insufficiency (CI), a prevalent binocular vision disorder in adults and children, is characterized by greater exophoria at near than at distance, reduced fusional convergence amplitude, receded near point of convergence, and a reduced accommodative convergence over accommodation ratio (AC/A). CI is associated with symptoms that include double/blurred vision, eyestrain, and headaches when engaged in reading or other near work, thus interfering with activities of daily living. The recent NEI/NIH multi-center randomized clinical trial, the Convergence Insufficiency Treatment Trial (CITT), demonstrated the effectiveness of Office-Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy with home reinforcement (OBVAT) for CI, reporting 73% of patients have sustained improvements of vision function and symptoms. The team published the first fMRI neural substrate data evoked using convergence eye movements in CI patients before and then post-OBVAT. The team's results suggest that with the reduction of visual symptoms, the following were observed: 1) an increase in the percent signal change of functional activity in the frontal eye fields, posterior parietal cortex and the cerebellar vermis, 2) an increase in convergence peak velocity, 3) a decrease in the near point of convergence, 4) an increase in positive fusional amplitude and 5) a reduction in the amount of exophoria at near. The aims of the current proposal are to test the following two hypotheses as potential underlying mechanisms of CI that may be improved post OBVAT: 1) a reduced ability to adapt vergence in near and far space via the 'slow' component of vergence and 2) a reduced ability to quickly diminish disparity error via the 'fast' component of vergence. Not only will our quantitative methods integrated with established CITT standards address important questions about potential mechanisms causing CI, this proposal seeks to identify how a validated vergence therapy may remediate symptoms. This proposal will determine whether either of these two potential mechanisms are causing CI by quantifying the following: 1) rate and magnitude of phoria adaptation, 2) forced vergence fixation disparity curves, 3) peak velocity of convergence eye movements (studying visual cues such as disparity, accommodation and proximal stimuli in isolation and combination), and 4) the functional activity of the fast and slow vergence neural substrates prior to, and then after, OBVAT. The assembled study team is particularly knowledgeable in terms of OBVAT, convergence insufficiency, optometry, vision science, oculomotor research, functional imaging, modeling and statistics with the necessary resources to successfully complete both aims of this study. Results from the project's aims can lead to targeted treatments with improved success rates, potentially reducing the time to remediate symptoms, and ultimately reducing health care costs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Jersey
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07102
        • NJIT

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosis of symptomatic convergence insufficiency binocularly normal control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of head trauma any systematic disease that can interfere with vergence or accommodation such as multiple sclerosis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: CI OBVAT
Patients with Convergence Insufficiency in Active Vision Therapy
Behavioral: Office Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy
Exercises that will stimulate disparity vergence or accommodation independently and then combined will be used.
Sham Comparator: CI Sham therapy
Behavioral: Office Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy
Exercises that will stimulate disparity vergence or accommodation independently and then combined will be used.
Active Comparator: Controls OBVAT
Control receive active therapy
Behavioral: Office Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy
Exercises that will stimulate disparity vergence or accommodation independently and then combined will be used.
Sham Comparator: Controls Sham
Subjects with Normal Binocular Vision will receive a therapy that appears to be therapeutic but does not have any binocular coordination benefits.
Behavioral: Office Based Vergence and Accommodative Therapy
Exercises that will stimulate disparity vergence or accommodation independently and then combined will be used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disparity Vergence Response Amplitude
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 year
how accurate a patient can fixate on a new target
through study completion, an average of 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
New Jersey Institute of Technology

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Eye Institute (NEI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Atam Dhawan, PhD, New Jersey Institute of Technology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 18, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 25, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • F182-13
  • R01EY023261 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

At this time there is no plan in place because the eye movement data collected will be in a proprietary format

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings