Neuro-Immune Interactions in the Gut (NIG)

November 3, 2022 updated by: Simone Keck, University Children's Hospital Basel

The Enteric Nervous System as Modulator of Mucosal Immune Cells

Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is diagnosed shortly after birth and is characterized by the presence of megacolon. HD is caused when ganglion cells of the enteric nervous system (ENS) in the wall of the large intestine do not develop before birth. This results in a lack of gastrointestinal motility and leads to stool obstruction. It is known that ablation of enteric nerves is associated with intestinal infection and inflammation. Indeed the most severe complication in HD is Hirschsprung's associated enterocolitis (HAEC), characterized by explosive diarrhea, abdominal distension, fever and impending septic shock. Bacteria overgrowth and changes in colonic mucosal immune cell populations during HAEC suggest a possible defect in mucosal immune homeostasis. Under steady state conditions, the mucosal immune system must be tightly controlled to avoid harmful reactions against commensal flora and food antigens, while allowing protective immune responses against invading pathogens. This balance between tolerance and defense is influenced by the mucosal microenvironment, which in turn determines the phenotype and stability of mucosal immune cell populations. The goal of this project is to understand if the enteric nervous system plays a role in regulating mucosal immunity and how this might contribute to the development of HAEC.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Hirschsprung's disease (HD) is diagnosed shortly after birth and is characterized by the absence of enteric nerves in parts of colon [Amiel et al.]. Following surgical correction many patients develop HD-associated enterocolitis (HAEC), a condition distinguished by intestinal inflammation resulting in abdominal distension, severe diarrhea, fever and sepsis [Demehri et al.]. The underlying factors leading to HAEC remain poorly understood and likely involve a defect in epithelial barrier, including decreased mucin production and insufficient immunoglobulin translocation. The establishment of the epithelial barrier is dependent on epithelial recognition of microbial products by innate immune receptors, like toll-like receptors (TLRs) [Peterson et al.]. TLR-dependent epithelial recognition of microflora also coordinates the immune response away from harmless commensal bacteria and towards pathogenic invaders. Both innate and adaptive effector cell functions are influenced by epithelial-derived signals. Under homeostatic conditions commensal bacteria induce anti-inflammatory cytokines in epithelial cells which trigger a tolerogenic phenotype in mucosal antigen presenting cells (APC) resulting in generation of commensal-specific regulatory T cells (Tregs) [Curotto de Lafaille et al.]. During infection, recognition of pathogenic organisms by epithelial cells leads to secretion of inflammatory cytokines thereby inducing an inflammatory APC phenotype which promotes T effector cell (Th1, Th17) generation. The enteric nervous system is directly located underneath the epithelium and controls epithelial cell function. Ablation of enteric glia cells, one of the two cell types of the ENS, in mice is associated with inflammation and enterocolitis [Cornet et al.]. In a study from 2011 Flamant and co-workers demonstrate that enteric glia cells protect from a shigella flexneri invasion by preventing lesions in the epithelial barrier mediated by the glia cell derived neurothrophic factor S-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO) [Flamant et al.]. We hypothesize that the lack of an enteric nervous system in HD patients modulates the microbial recognition of epithelial cells and thereby the phenotype of underlying mucosal APCs and effector T cells; this might be associated with the manifestation of HAEC.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
103

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Heidelberg, Germany, 69120
        • Kinderchirurgie Universität Heidelberg
  • Switzerland
      • Bellinzona, Switzerland, 6500
        • Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli
      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Inselspital Universität Bern
      • Geneva, Switzerland, 1205
        • Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève
      • Lausanne, Switzerland, 1011
        • Bâtiment Hospitalier CHUV
      • Luzern, Switzerland, 6000
        • Luzerner Kantonsspital
      • Saint Gallen, Switzerland, 9000
        • Kinderspital St. Gallen
      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8032
        • Kinderspital Zürich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

3 years to 14 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients between 0 and 18 years undergoing bowel resection

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

No signed informed consent No blood from patients with weak general state of health

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Hirschsprung's disease patients
Children diagnosed with Hirschsprung's disease or Hirschsprung's disease associated enterocolitis
control patients
Children diagnosed and treated for miscellaneous bowel diseases

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phenotypic analysis of immune and nervous cell populations
Time Frame: 5 years
Determining cell frequencies and subtypes using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) and FlowJo software
5 years
Expression profil
Time Frame: 5 years
RNA expression profile of whole colon tissue and single cell populations
5 years
Histological analysis
Time Frame: 5 years
Microscopic analysis of colonic tissue using immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry
5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Microbial metagenomics sequencing
Time Frame: 5 years
16S/18S/ITS Amplicon
5 years
Identifying genetic defect
Time Frame: 5 years
Targeted Sanger sequencing of known Hirschsprung's disease associated genes
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Children's Hospital Basel

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
University Children's Hospital, Zurich
Luzerner Kantonsspital
Inselspital Universität Bern
Kinderspital St. Gallen
Bâtiment Hospitalier CHUV
Universität Klinikum Heidelberg
Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève
Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Stefan Holland-Cunz, Prof, University Children's Hospital Basel

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 28, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 31, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 6, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EKNZ 2015-049

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings