Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke

April 8, 2020 updated by: Neurologie, University Hospital, Ghent

The Feasibility, Usability and Acceptability of a Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke

As aphasia is one of the most common and disabling disorders following stroke, in many cases resolving in long-term deficits, it is now thought that intensive aphasia therapy is effective, even in the chronic phase following stroke. However, as intensive aphasia rehabilitation is difficult to achieve in clinical practice, tablet-based aphasia therapies are explored to further facilitate language recovery. Although there is mounting evidence that computer-based treatments are effective, it is also important to assess the feasibility, usability and acceptability of these technologies, especially in the acute phase post stroke. The investigators assume that tablet-based aphasia therapy is a feasible treatment option for patients with aphasia in the acute phase following stroke. The researchers also believe that the specific app that will be used in therapy is user-friendly and that it will be well accepted by this specific patient population.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective study, with each participant undergoing testing approximately within three days after inclusion in the study (immediately prior to tablet-based aphasia therapy). Based on the results of diagnostic testing (standard of care in the acute phase), therapy will be tailored for each individual. After two short training sessions, patients will independently practice with the app during hospitalisation, guided by a user-friendly instruction sheet. Patients will be encouraged to practice as much as possible, with a minimum of 30 minutes per day. Exercises will be selected by the speech-language therapist based on diagnostic results and will be adjusted for difficulty and type of exercise during treatment based on performance rates. the aim of the study is to investigate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy in patients with aphasia in the acute phase following stroke.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
25

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Belgium
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • University Hospital, department of neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with aphasia after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Maximum 2 weeks post-stroke
  • Minimum 18 years old
  • A minimum proficient language level of Dutch
  • Imaging (CT or MRI) prior to inclusion
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive disorders that hinder the use of the tablet-based aphasia therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Intervention group
Each participant will receive a tablet-based aphasia therapy
Behavioral: Tablet-based aphasia therapy
patients will independently practice with a speech app during hospitalisation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via the recruitment rate
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Recruitment rate: number of patients enrolled versus total patients meeting study criteria + notation of reasons why patients did not enroll
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via the retention rate
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Retention rate: number of patients continuing to use the mobile tablet until the time of discharge + notation of reasons why patients did not continue practicing
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via the adherence rate,
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Adherence rate: time patients practiced versus time advised to practice + notation of reasons why patients did not practice the advised time
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via protocol deviations
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Notation of any protocol deviations
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Usability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via a self-prepared usability questionnaire,
Time Frame: date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week
Self-prepared usability questionnaire: patients will need to fill in a 5 question survey (5-point Likert scale) measuring the usability of a tablet-based therapy. Minimum score is 1 (= totally not agree), maximum score is 5 (= totally agree)
date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week
Usability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via an observational checklist
Time Frame: date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Self-prepared observational checklist: patients will be observed during a therapy session. Different sub-tasks will be scored for independency on a 3-point scale. Minimum score is 1 (completely dependent), maximum score is 3 (= completely independent)
date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Usability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via within-task improvements of the app
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Notation of exercises performed with the app
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Acceptability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via a vertical VAS-scale for satisfaction
Time Frame: date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week
Vertical visual anologue scale (VAS) for satisfaction: patients have to indicate their general level of satisfaction post-intervention on a vertical VAS-scale. Minimum score is 0 (= not satisfied), maximum score is 100 (= very satisfied)
date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Ghent

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Veerle De Herdt, University Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 8, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EC/2018/1006

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings