Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke

April 8, 2020 updated by: Neurologie, University Hospital, Ghent

The Feasibility, Usability and Acceptability of a Tablet-based Aphasia Therapy in the Acute Phase After Stroke

As aphasia is one of the most common and disabling disorders following stroke, in many cases resolving in long-term deficits, it is now thought that intensive aphasia therapy is effective, even in the chronic phase following stroke. However, as intensive aphasia rehabilitation is difficult to achieve in clinical practice, tablet-based aphasia therapies are explored to further facilitate language recovery. Although there is mounting evidence that computer-based treatments are effective, it is also important to assess the feasibility, usability and acceptability of these technologies, especially in the acute phase post stroke. The investigators assume that tablet-based aphasia therapy is a feasible treatment option for patients with aphasia in the acute phase following stroke. The researchers also believe that the specific app that will be used in therapy is user-friendly and that it will be well accepted by this specific patient population.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study is a prospective study, with each participant undergoing testing approximately within three days after inclusion in the study (immediately prior to tablet-based aphasia therapy). Based on the results of diagnostic testing (standard of care in the acute phase), therapy will be tailored for each individual. After two short training sessions, patients will independently practice with the app during hospitalisation, guided by a user-friendly instruction sheet. Patients will be encouraged to practice as much as possible, with a minimum of 30 minutes per day. Exercises will be selected by the speech-language therapist based on diagnostic results and will be adjusted for difficulty and type of exercise during treatment based on performance rates. the aim of the study is to investigate the feasibility, usability and acceptability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy in patients with aphasia in the acute phase following stroke.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

25

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
        • University Hospital, department of neurology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with aphasia after an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • Maximum 2 weeks post-stroke
  • Minimum 18 years old
  • A minimum proficient language level of Dutch
  • Imaging (CT or MRI) prior to inclusion
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe psychiatric disorders and/or cognitive disorders that hinder the use of the tablet-based aphasia therapy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention group
Each participant will receive a tablet-based aphasia therapy
patients will independently practice with a speech app during hospitalisation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via the recruitment rate
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Recruitment rate: number of patients enrolled versus total patients meeting study criteria + notation of reasons why patients did not enroll
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via the retention rate
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Retention rate: number of patients continuing to use the mobile tablet until the time of discharge + notation of reasons why patients did not continue practicing
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via the adherence rate,
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Adherence rate: time patients practiced versus time advised to practice + notation of reasons why patients did not practice the advised time
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Feasibility of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via protocol deviations
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Notation of any protocol deviations
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Usability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via a self-prepared usability questionnaire,
Time Frame: date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week
Self-prepared usability questionnaire: patients will need to fill in a 5 question survey (5-point Likert scale) measuring the usability of a tablet-based therapy. Minimum score is 1 (= totally not agree), maximum score is 5 (= totally agree)
date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week
Usability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via an observational checklist
Time Frame: date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Self-prepared observational checklist: patients will be observed during a therapy session. Different sub-tasks will be scored for independency on a 3-point scale. Minimum score is 1 (completely dependent), maximum score is 3 (= completely independent)
date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Usability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via within-task improvements of the app
Time Frame: from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Notation of exercises performed with the app
from date of inclusion to date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 20 weeks
Acceptability of a tablet-based aphasia therapy via a vertical VAS-scale for satisfaction
Time Frame: date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week
Vertical visual anologue scale (VAS) for satisfaction: patients have to indicate their general level of satisfaction post-intervention on a vertical VAS-scale. Minimum score is 0 (= not satisfied), maximum score is 100 (= very satisfied)
date of hospital discharge, an average of 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Veerle De Herdt, University Ghent

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 20, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aphasia

  • Teachers College, Columbia University
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia Non Fluent | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction | Aphasia, Rehabilitation
    United States
  • University of California, Berkeley
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and... and other collaborators
    Recruiting
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Aphasia, Non-fluent | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia Following Nontraumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage
    United States
  • University of South Carolina
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Completed
    Stroke | Aphasia | Stroke, Ischemic | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Anomic | Aphasia, Global | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Mixed | Aphasia, Jargon | Aphasia, Expressive | Aphasia, Conduction
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA) | Logopenic Variant of Primary Progressive Aphasia (LPA) | Progressive Aphasia in Alzheimer's Disease
    United States
  • Maya Henry
    National Institutes of Health (NIH); National Institute on Aging (NIA)
    Recruiting
    Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Logopenic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (svPPA) | Nonfluent Variant Primary Progressive Aphasia (nfvPPA) | Progressive Aphasia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia... and other conditions
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    University of California, San Francisco; National Institute on Deafness and...
    Active, not recruiting
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • University of Texas at Austin
    National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
    Enrolling by invitation
    Primary Progressive Aphasia | Aphasia | Semantic Dementia | Logopenic Progressive Aphasia | Semantic Memory Disorder | Nonfluent Aphasia, Progressive | Aphasia, Progressive
    United States
  • Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia
    Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona.; Universitat Pompeu Fabra
    Completed
    Aphasia | Aphasia, Broca | Aphasia, Wernicke | Aphasia, Fluent | Aphasia, Nonfluent
    Spain
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
    Not yet recruiting
    Aphasia, Acquired | Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction | Post Stroke Aphasia | Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
    India
  • Flint Rehabilitation Devices, LLC
    University of Texas
    Completed
    Broca Aphasia
    United States

Clinical Trials on Tablet-based aphasia therapy

Subscribe