Evaluation of Systane Complete for the Treatment of Contact Lens Discomfort

March 23, 2020 updated by: Andrew Pucker, University of Alabama at Birmingham
Clinicians commonly use artificial tears off label for treating contact lens (CL) discomfort and the dry eye associated with CLs because new artificial tear formulations have the potential to outperform the available CL rewetting drops. While off-label, McDonald et al. have previously shown that using a common artificial tear, Systane Ultra, before and after CL use is an effective means for treating daily disposable CL wears who have CL discomfort. Recently, a new formulation of artificial tears, Systane Complete, was released to the market. Systane Complete is a unique formulation that has combined elements from both Systane Ultra (indicated for aqueous deficient dry eye) and Systane Balance (indicated for evaporative dry eye) to create an artificial tear with an indication for aqueous deficient, evaporative, and mixed (both aqueous deficient and evaporative) dry eye. Thus, the goal of this study is to determine in a randomized clinical trial if Systane Complete is able to effectively improve the symptoms of patients who have CL discomfort.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Soft contact lenses (CL) are the most common CL modality with over 140 million users world. Despite many improvements in CL materials and solutions, the advent of daily disposable CLs, and the addition of rewetting drops to improve CL comfort, research has shown that between 21% to 64% of CL wearers permanently discontinue CL use because of eye discomfort. Contact Lens Discomfort (CLD) as defined by the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) "is a condition characterized by episodic or persistent adverse ocular sensations related to lens wear, either with or without visual disturbance, resulting from reduced compatibility between the CL and the eye's environment, which can lead to decreased wearing time and discontinuation of CL wear." TFOS further states that CLD is a multifactorial condition that stems from both CL (e.g., material design, fit, care system) and environmental factors (patient factors, medication compliance, external environmental factors, ocular environment). While environmental factors related to the patient such as age and sex are inherent, rewetting drops or artificial tears can be used to treat tear film deficiencies associated with CLD. The U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA) defines rewetting/lubricating drops as "an in-eye solution for use with CLs" that contains "one or more active ingredients (e.g., ophthalmic demulcents) in sufficient concentration to alleviate symptoms of discomfort from CL wear by physical means." Clinicians also commonly use artificial tears off label for treating CLD and the dry eye associated with CLs because artificial tear formulations have the potential to outperform CL rewetting drops. The FDA separately classifies artificial tears as topical drops that contain specific types of demulcents or emollients. While off-label, McDonald et al. have previously shown that using a common artificial tear, Systane Ultra, before and after CL use is an effective means for treating daily disposable CL wears who have CLD. Recently, a new formulation of artificial tears, Systane Complete, was released to the market. Systane Complete is a unique formulation that has combined elements from both Systane Ultra (indicated for aqueous deficient dry eye) and Systane Balance (indicated for evaporative dry eye) to create an artificial tear with an indication for aqueous deficient, evaporative, and mixed (both aqueous deficient and evaporative) dry eye. Thus, the Research Goal of this study is to determine in a randomized clinical trial if Systane Complete is able to effectively improve the symptoms of CLD suffers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
46

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham
    • New York
      • Babylon, New York, United States, 11702
        • Lindenhurst Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38104
        • Southern College of Optometry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported contact lens discomfort
  • Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire (CLDEQ)-8 scores ≥ 12
  • Daily disposable contact lens wearer
  • Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/30 or better

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All other contact lens types (e.g., currently wearing two week or monthly replacement contact lenses or hard contact lenses)
  • Non-compliant daily disposable contact lens wearers (must regularly replace contact lenses daily)
  • Systemic health conditions known to alter tear film physiology
  • History of ocular surgery within the past 12 months
  • History of severe ocular trauma, active ocular infection, or inflammation
  • Currently using Accutane or eye medications
  • Pregnant or breast feeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Systane Complete
Subjects randomized to this group will be asked to use Systane Complete once before and after contact lens use.
Drug: Systane Complete
Systane Complete is an artificial tear indicated for patients who have evaporative, aqueous deficient, or mixed dry eye.
No Intervention: No Treatment
Subjects randomized to this group will not receive a treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Contact Lens Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in contact lens symptoms as measured with the Contact Lens Dry Eye Questionnaire-8 (CLDEQ-8) and CLDEQ-4 at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The CLDEQ-8 score range is 0 to 37 with 0 being the best score. Subjects were required to have a CLDEQ-8 of at least 12 in order to participate. The CLDEQ-4 is a subset of the CLDEQ-8, and it was also reported because it is a unidimensional measure of ocular discomfort in contact lens wearers. The CLDEQ-4 has a score range of 0 to 18 with 0 being the best score.
Baseline through 2 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
End of Day Eye Comfort
Time Frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in eye symptoms as measured with the Standardized Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The scale range is 0 to 28 with 0 being the best score.
Baseline through 2 Weeks
Corneal Staining
Time Frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in conjuctivial staining at two weeks compared to baseline using the Brien Holden Vision Institute (BHVI) scale, which measures five regions of the eye on a (0-4) scale (max of 20 per metric). A score 0 is the best possible score.
Baseline through 2 Weeks
Schirmer's I Test Without Anesthetic
Time Frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in tear volume as measured in mm of wetting with a Schirmer's strip at 5 mins at 2 weeks compared to baseline. The score ranges is 0 mm to 35 mm with 35 mm being the best score.
Baseline through 2 Weeks
Tear Break-Up Time (TBUT)
Time Frame: Baseline through 2 Weeks
Improvement in tear break up time as measured with a slit-lamp biomicroscope and sodium fluorescein in seconds at 2 weeks compared to baseline. Scores range for 0 to 60 seconds with 60 seconds being the best score.
Baseline through 2 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama at Birmingham

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Alcon Research
Southern College of Optometry
Lindenhurst Eye Physicians & Surgeons, PC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 23, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 23, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 25, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 000522017

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

There are no plans to share individual subject's data. Data will only be published in aggregate form.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings