Nutritional Status in Patients With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

September 6, 2023 updated by: Dimitrios Karayiannis, Evangelismos Hospital

Nutritional Status as a Prognostic Marker of Risk and Outcome in Patients Admitted to Hospital With Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

A cross sectional observation study of body composition in COPD patients consecutively hospitalized with acute exacerbation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Skeletal muscle dysfunction and changes in body composition are important extra-pulmonary manifestations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) that occur in all stages of disease and are associated with poor outcome. In patients with COPD, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has usually been used to estimate fat-free mass (FFM) and body composition through predictive equations. Very few studies had focused on raw BIA data. The aim of this study is first describe the measurement of phase angle in patients with with acute exacerbation and second to determine the validity of phase angle in this group by assessing its relationship with established markers of function, disease severity and prognosis.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Aggeliki Papanikolaou, MD, PhD
  • Phone Number: 6937158640

Study Locations

  • Greece
    • Kolonaki
      • Athens, Kolonaki, Greece, 10676
        • Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Evaggelismos Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients diagnosed with COPD according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD)

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Previous diagnosis of COPD based on history
  • Hospitalization with acute COPD exacerbation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of recent surgery (major) and trauma (major)
  • Patients with concomitant disease that might alter nutritional status (heart disease, cirrhosis, uncontrolled diabetes, chronic renal failure, uncontrolled cor pulmonale).
  • Contraindication to BIA including an implanted pacemaker, defibrillator or joint prosthesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Phase Angle
Time Frame: 1 month
The evaluation of phase angle will be performed by means of the electric bioimpedance apparatus. The measurements will be obtained with the patient in dorsal decubitus, barefoot, with the lower limbs slightly apart and without metal objects attached to the body, with electrodes placed on the right hand and foot.
1 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: 1 month
Secondary endpoint will be the correlation between FVC and muscle mass.
1 month
Correlation between phase angle and serum CRP levels.
Time Frame: 1 month
Detect the serum CRP levels and then analyze the correlation between CRP and phase angle measurement.
1 month
Forced expiratory flow volume in one second (FEV1).
Time Frame: 1 month
Forced expiratory flow volume in one second following standards recommended by European Respiratory Society and correlation with muscle mass.
1 month
Length of Hospital Stay (LOS)
Time Frame: 1 month
Duration of Hospital Stay
1 month
Phase Angle
Time Frame: 2 months
The evaluation of the phase angle will be performed by means of the electric bioimpedance apparatus. The measurements will be obtained with the patient in dorsal decubitus, barefoot, with the lower limbs slightly apart and without metal objects attached to the body, with electrodes placed on the right hand and foot.
2 months
Body Composition
Time Frame: 1 month.
Body composition will be assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (In Body 720, Biospace) at a standardized time after breakfast. Bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) is a simple, safe, non-invasive method to measure assess lean (e.g., muscle) vs. fat body compartments. Fat-free mass will be calculated by using disease-specific equations as described by Schols. Fat mass will then be calculated as total body weight minus fat-free mass. Such BIA measurements are accurate, comparable to other techniques used to assess body composition, and have been validated in patients with acute excerbation of COPD
1 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Evangelismos Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sotirios Kakkavas, MD, PhD, Pulmonary Medicine Dept, Evangelismos Hospital,

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • S. Kakavas, D. Karayiannis, A. Papanikolaou, A. Baschali, M. Sarantidou, A. Karachaliou, A. Karli, Z. Mastora, M. Palavra, G. Boulbasakos. Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Phase Angle as a Prognostic Marker for Outcome in Patients Admitted in Hospital with Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Clinical Nutrition 36:S101, 2017

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 9, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 15, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 6, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 53/27-01-2016

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings