NSE/Alb as a Prognostic Biomarker for Lung Cancer (NARPBLC)

May 19, 2019 updated by: First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

A Prospective Cohort Study on NSE/Alb as a Prognostic Biomarker for Lung Cancer Patients in Multicenter

The incidence and mortality rate of lung cancer is the highest in the world. Current studies have found that tumor markers, inflammatory or nutritional indicators have a good predictive value for the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Neuron specific enolase (NSE) and serum albumin (Alb) are important indicators for monitoring tumor progression and nutritional status in lung cancer patients, respectively. Previous studies suggested that the higher the NSE, the worse prognosis of NSCLC patients, while the lower the Alb, the worse the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. Through a retrospective study, the investigators found that NAR (NSE Alb Ratio) was higher and prognosis was poorer in patients undergoing NSCLC surgery. This is better than the previous assessment indicators PLR (platelet to lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio), AGR (albumin to globulin ratio), NAR can better assess prognosis. Therefore, on the basis of the previous retrospective analysis, the optimal NAR cut-off value was calculated according to ROC curve, and the value was grouped into multi-center prospective cohort study, and the relationship between NAR and other clinical indicators was studied by chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine the prognostic factors. Finally, NSCLC patients were stratified according to tumor stage and pathological classification, and the differences of survival time between high NAR group and low NAR group were compared again under different stages and types, and the different stages of NAR in NSCLC patients were further analyzed. The clinical significance of typing. By exploring and validating the relationship between NAR and the prognosis of NSCLC patients, the investigators try to establish a new prognostic index. Obviously, it has important value for clinical application.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
202

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • Recruiting
        • First hospital affiliated Xi'an jiaotong university
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Sample sources: Xi'an Jiaotong University First Affiliated Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital and other hospitals.

Subject recruitment process:

  1. Subject screening: Subjects were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  2. Recruitment of the research subject: In the course of clinical diagnosis and treatment, the competent doctor recruits.
  3. Subject informed consent: inform patients to collect their clinical data and follow up for clinical studies, signing informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) pathological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  • (2) 18-70 years of age and no gender restriction.
  • (3) patients who were admitted for the first time and underwent routine blood tests, three lung cancer and liver function tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) pregnant or lactating women
  • (2) patients with other malignancies at the same time
  • (3) patients with acute and chronic inflammation, autoimmune diseases, and patients with obvious liver and renal insufficiency.
  • (4) patients with incomplete clinical and pathological data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
high NAR
Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio is higher than 3.2×10-7
Diagnostic test: Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio
Previous studies have shown that inflammation and nutrition-related factors such as CRP/Alb (C-reactive protein-albumin ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) can help to assess the prognosis of malignant tumors. This study is the first time to combine NSCLC tumor marker NSE and patient nutrition-related indicators Alb to predict the prognosis of patients, trying to find high sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC prognostic indicators to guide clinical work.
low NAR
Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio is lower than 3.2×10-7
Diagnostic test: Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio
Previous studies have shown that inflammation and nutrition-related factors such as CRP/Alb (C-reactive protein-albumin ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) can help to assess the prognosis of malignant tumors. This study is the first time to combine NSCLC tumor marker NSE and patient nutrition-related indicators Alb to predict the prognosis of patients, trying to find high sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC prognostic indicators to guide clinical work.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2 years.
The time from randomization to death due to any cause. The last follow-up time is usually calculated as the time of death for those who have been lost before death.
2 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years.
Refers to the time from randomization to relapse or death due to disease progression. It is usually the end point after radical surgery. DFS is more difficult to record as an end point than OS because it requires careful follow-up and timely detection of disease recurrence. In this study, as an important prognostic indicator for patients undergoing NSCLC surgery.
2 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Xi'an Central Hospital
Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Sida Qin, MD PhD, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 19, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XJTU1AF-CRF-2017-020

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings