NSE/Alb as a Prognostic Biomarker for Lung Cancer (NARPBLC)

A Prospective Cohort Study on NSE/Alb as a Prognostic Biomarker for Lung Cancer Patients in Multicenter

The incidence and mortality rate of lung cancer is the highest in the world. Current studies have found that tumor markers, inflammatory or nutritional indicators have a good predictive value for the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Neuron specific enolase (NSE) and serum albumin (Alb) are important indicators for monitoring tumor progression and nutritional status in lung cancer patients, respectively. Previous studies suggested that the higher the NSE, the worse prognosis of NSCLC patients, while the lower the Alb, the worse the prognosis of patients with malignant tumors. Through a retrospective study, the investigators found that NAR (NSE Alb Ratio) was higher and prognosis was poorer in patients undergoing NSCLC surgery. This is better than the previous assessment indicators PLR (platelet to lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio), AGR (albumin to globulin ratio), NAR can better assess prognosis. Therefore, on the basis of the previous retrospective analysis, the optimal NAR cut-off value was calculated according to ROC curve, and the value was grouped into multi-center prospective cohort study, and the relationship between NAR and other clinical indicators was studied by chi-square test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine the prognostic factors. Finally, NSCLC patients were stratified according to tumor stage and pathological classification, and the differences of survival time between high NAR group and low NAR group were compared again under different stages and types, and the different stages of NAR in NSCLC patients were further analyzed. The clinical significance of typing. By exploring and validating the relationship between NAR and the prognosis of NSCLC patients, the investigators try to establish a new prognostic index. Obviously, it has important value for clinical application.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

202

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shaanxi
      • Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710061
        • Recruiting
        • First hospital affiliated Xi'an jiaotong university
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Sample sources: Xi'an Jiaotong University First Affiliated Hospital, Second Affiliated Hospital, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Shaanxi Provincial Cancer Hospital and other hospitals.

Subject recruitment process:

  1. Subject screening: Subjects were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria.
  2. Recruitment of the research subject: In the course of clinical diagnosis and treatment, the competent doctor recruits.
  3. Subject informed consent: inform patients to collect their clinical data and follow up for clinical studies, signing informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • (1) pathological diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer
  • (2) 18-70 years of age and no gender restriction.
  • (3) patients who were admitted for the first time and underwent routine blood tests, three lung cancer and liver function tests.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • (1) pregnant or lactating women
  • (2) patients with other malignancies at the same time
  • (3) patients with acute and chronic inflammation, autoimmune diseases, and patients with obvious liver and renal insufficiency.
  • (4) patients with incomplete clinical and pathological data.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
high NAR
Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio is higher than 3.2×10-7
Previous studies have shown that inflammation and nutrition-related factors such as CRP/Alb (C-reactive protein-albumin ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) can help to assess the prognosis of malignant tumors. This study is the first time to combine NSCLC tumor marker NSE and patient nutrition-related indicators Alb to predict the prognosis of patients, trying to find high sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC prognostic indicators to guide clinical work.
low NAR
Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio is lower than 3.2×10-7
Previous studies have shown that inflammation and nutrition-related factors such as CRP/Alb (C-reactive protein-albumin ratio), PLR (platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio), NLR (neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) can help to assess the prognosis of malignant tumors. This study is the first time to combine NSCLC tumor marker NSE and patient nutrition-related indicators Alb to predict the prognosis of patients, trying to find high sensitivity and specificity for NSCLC prognostic indicators to guide clinical work.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 2 years.
The time from randomization to death due to any cause. The last follow-up time is usually calculated as the time of death for those who have been lost before death.
2 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disease-free survival
Time Frame: 2 years.
Refers to the time from randomization to relapse or death due to disease progression. It is usually the end point after radical surgery. DFS is more difficult to record as an end point than OS because it requires careful follow-up and timely detection of disease recurrence. In this study, as an important prognostic indicator for patients undergoing NSCLC surgery.
2 years.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sida Qin, MD PhD, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 28, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 28, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 30, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 19, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

Clinical Trials on Neuron-Specific Enolase to Albumin Ratio

Subscribe