Exercise Training and Manual Wheelchair Users With SCI
Application of the WMS for Advanced Physical Training of Manual Wheelchair Users With Spinal Cord Injury
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63108
- Washington University School of Medicine
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants will have a diagnosis of spinal cord injury (SCI)
- be18 years or older
- have the ability to self-propel a manual wheelchair (MWC) bilaterally with their upper extremities
- use a MWC for at least 75% of their daily activities
- participate in less than 60 minutes of moderate-intensity exercise per week in the last month
- have written physician approval to participate in the study
- understand English at a sixth-grade level or higher
- be able to follow multi-step instructions
- independently provide informed consent
- be willing to participate in two assessments and 36 intervention sessions at the Enabling Mobility in the Community Laboratory (EMC Lab).
Exclusion Criteria:
- maneuver MWC with their lower extremities or with only one upper extremity
- have bilateral incoordination due to strength inequality or neurological involvement that impairs propulsion in a steady, straight line
- have had surgeries compromising the integrity of the upper extremities or cardiovascular complications within the past year
- currently receive medical treatment for an acute upper extremity injury
- have a Stage IV pressure injury
- are currently hospitalized
- have a cognitive impairment that does not allow them to provide consent or follow multi-step directions.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Roller-based intervention Group (IG)
A group participating in a high-intensity exercise on a roller-based system.
|
A group of manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with spinal cord injury (SCI) that will complete an initial exercise education and a 12-week (3 sessions per week) evidence-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) program using the roller-based WheelMill (WMS) system.
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Group (CG)
A group participating in an independent workout program at an accessible community-based fitness facility.
|
A group of manual wheelchair users (MWUs) with spinal cord injury (SCI) that will complete an initial exercise education session and enroll in a 12-week (3 sessions per week) independent workout program at an accessible community-based fitness facility.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
VO2peak Change
Time Frame: Baseline to Post Intervention at 4 months
|
VO2 peak will be measured using a standard computer-integrated, open-circuit, breath-by-breath metabolic measurement system (TrueOne 2400, Parvo Medics, Sandy, UT, US) while the participant performs a graded-exercise test on an ACE, SCIFIT PRO2 (Life Fitness, Tulsa, OK, US).
In addition, an H7 Heart Rate Sensor (Polar Electro Inc., Lake Success, NY, US) will be placed on each participant to monitor heart rate during testing.
Each participant will be fitted with a silicone mask to cover his or her mouth and nose while performing the exercise test, which is typically completed in 8-12 minutes depending on the participant's fitness level.
The protocol involves a 3-minute warm-up at a workload of 8-10 watts (W) followed by a standard ACE ramp protocol.
The ramp protocol requires participants to maintain 60 revolutions per minute (rpm) with incremental increases by 7 W every minute, until exhaustion.
|
Baseline to Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
The 6-minute Push Test (6MPT) Change
Time Frame: Baseline to Post Intervention at 4 months
|
The 6MPT is a functional mobility and physical fitness test involving manual wheelchair users propelling a designated 30-meter loop.
Participants are asked to propel as far as possible on the course within 6 minutes.
Total distance propelled is determined by tallying the number of completed 30-meter loops and measuring the partially completed final lap using a tape measure.
|
Baseline to Post Intervention at 4 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Wong-Baker FACES pain scale (FACES)
Time Frame: At baseline. During each intervention session. At follow up assessment.
|
FACES is a 10-point visual-analog scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) for participants to rate their level of pain.
FACES will be administered at the beginning and end of each session, for all groups, to ensure that sessions (IG, CG) are not causing or exacerbating pain.
|
At baseline. During each intervention session. At follow up assessment.
|
|
PROMIS-29 Profile (v2.0) Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
The PROMIS-29 assesses seven different domains: anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain interference, physical function, sleep disturbance, and ability to participate in social roles and activities, as well as a single pain intensity item.
The seven domains are scored individually, and the single pain intensity item is reported as its raw score.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
Leisure Time Physical Activity for People with Spinal Cord Injury (LTPAQ-SCI) Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
The LTPAQ-SCI is a self-report measure of leisure time physical activity that assesses minutes of mild, moderate, and heavy intensity activity over the previous seven days.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
Wheelchair User's Shoulder Pain Index (WUSPI) Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
The WUSPI is a self-report measure of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users (MWUs) during functional activities.
The WUSPI consists of a 15-item questionnaire addressing shoulder pain during 15 activities within four domains: transfers, wheelchair mobility, self-care, and general activities.
A 10-point visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain) is used to determine pain intensity experienced during each activity.
The WUSPI score (from 0 [no pain] to 150 [worst pain] across all items) indicates the participant's level of shoulder pain during functional activities.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
Wheelchair Skills Test Questionnaire (WST-Q) Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
The WST-Q is a self-report measure of wheelchair skills.
The WST-Q consists of a 34-item questionnaire addressing a MWU's capacity and performance of wheelchair skills.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
Weight Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
Participants will be weighed during Baseline and Post Intervention assessment.
Weight will be reported in kilograms.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
BMI Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
BMI will be reported in kg/m^2
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
Body Composition Overall Body Fat % Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
Participants will then undergo body composition assessment via DEXA (General Electric Lunar iDXA), which is commonly used in research due to its precision and safety.
Body fat % will be the unit of measure.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
HbA1c Level Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
Blood draws will be completed to measure HbA1c levels in %.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
|
Cholesterol Change
Time Frame: Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
Blood draws will be completed to measure cholesterol levels.
Unit of measure will be in mg/dL.
|
Baseline and Post Intervention at 4 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Joseph W Klaesner, PhD, Washington University School of Medicine
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Weston KS, Wisloff U, Coombes JS. High-intensity interval training in patients with lifestyle-induced cardiometabolic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Aug;48(16):1227-34. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2013-092576. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
- Fabel K, Fabel K, Tam B, Kaufer D, Baiker A, Simmons N, Kuo CJ, Palmer TD. VEGF is necessary for exercise-induced adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Nov;18(10):2803-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2003.03041.x.
- Ramos JS, Dalleck LC, Tjonna AE, Beetham KS, Coombes JS. The impact of high-intensity interval training versus moderate-intensity continuous training on vascular function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015 May;45(5):679-92. doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0321-z.
- Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One. 2014 Jul 28;9(7):e103135. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103135. eCollection 2014.
- Zwinkels M, Verschuren O, Janssen TW, Ketelaar M, Takken T; Sport-2-Stay-Fit study group; Sport-2-Stay-Fit study group. Exercise training programs to improve hand rim wheelchair propulsion capacity: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2014 Sep;28(9):847-61. doi: 10.1177/0269215514525181. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
- Klaesner J, Morgan KA, Gray DB. The development of an instrumented wheelchair propulsion testing and training device. Assist Technol. 2014 Spring;26(1):24-32. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.792020.
- Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Feb;87(2):189-97. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.09.014.
- Stinson JN, Kavanagh T, Yamada J, Gill N, Stevens B. Systematic review of the psychometric properties, interpretability and feasibility of self-report pain intensity measures for use in clinical trials in children and adolescents. Pain. 2006 Nov;125(1-2):143-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 13.
- Garcia-Masso X, Serra-Ano P, Garcia-Raffi LM, Sanchez-Perez EA, Lopez-Pascual J, Gonzalez LM. Validation of the use of Actigraph GT3X accelerometers to estimate energy expenditure in full time manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013 Dec;51(12):898-903. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.85. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- National Spinal Cord Injury Statistical Center. (2016). 2016 Annual Statistical Report - Complete Public Version. Birmingham, AL: University of Alabama at Birmingham.
- Keyser RE, Rasch EK, Finley M, Rodgers MM. Improved upper-body endurance following a 12-week home exercise program for manual wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003 Nov-Dec;40(6):501-10. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.11.0501.
- West CR, Alyahya A, Laher I, Krassioukov A. Peripheral vascular function in spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2013 Jan;51(1):10-9. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.136. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
- Froehlich-Grobe K, Jones D, Businelle MS, Kendzor DE, Balasubramanian BA. Impact of disability and chronic conditions on health. Disabil Health J. 2016 Oct;9(4):600-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 3.
- Nightingale TE, Metcalfe RS, Vollaard NB, Bilzon JL. Exercise Guidelines to Promote Cardiometabolic Health in Spinal Cord Injured Humans: Time to Raise the Intensity? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1693-1704. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
- Hicks AL, Martin Ginis KA, Pelletier CA, Ditor DS, Foulon B, Wolfe DL. The effects of exercise training on physical capacity, strength, body composition and functional performance among adults with spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Spinal Cord. 2011 Nov;49(11):1103-27. doi: 10.1038/sc.2011.62. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
- Carroll DD, Courtney-Long EA, Stevens AC, Sloan ML, Lullo C, Visser SN, Fox MH, Armour BS, Campbell VA, Brown DR, Dorn JM; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: disability and physical activity--United States, 2009-2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014 May 9;63(18):407-13.
- Ginis KA, Arbour-Nicitopoulos KP, Latimer AE, Buchholz AC, Bray SR, Craven BC, Hayes KC, Hicks AL, McColl MA, Potter PJ, Smith K, Wolfe DL. Leisure time physical activity in a population-based sample of people with spinal cord injury part II: activity types, intensities, and durations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 May;91(5):729-33. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.12.028.
- Sullivan KJ. President's perspectives. Healthcare Reform: a call to action for our patients. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;33(3):171-2. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181b65372. No abstract available.
- McCormick ZL, Lynch M, Liem B, Jacobs G, Hwang P, Hornby TG, Rydberg L, Roth E. Feasibility for developing cardiovascular exercise recommendations for persons with motor-complete paraplegia based on manual wheelchair propulsion; A protocol and preliminary data. J Spinal Cord Med. 2016;39(1):45-9. doi: 10.1179/2045772314Y.0000000292. Epub 2015 Jan 13.
- Kaye, H. S., Kang, T., & LaPlante, M. P. (2000). Mobility device use in the United States. (No. 14). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research.
- American College of Sports Medicine. (2014). ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription (9th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
- Evans N, Wingo B, Sasso E, Hicks A, Gorgey AS, Harness E. Exercise Recommendations and Considerations for Persons With Spinal Cord Injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Sep;96(9):1749-50. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Jul 18. No abstract available.
- Totosy de Zepetnek JO, Pelletier CA, Hicks AL, MacDonald MJ. Following the Physical Activity Guidelines for Adults With Spinal Cord Injury for 16 Weeks Does Not Improve Vascular Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Sep;96(9):1566-75. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.019. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
- Gebel K, Ding D, Chey T, Stamatakis E, Brown WJ, Bauman AE. Effect of Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity on All-Cause Mortality in Middle-aged and Older Australians. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):970-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0541. Erratum In: JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1248.
- Jelleyman C, Yates T, O'Donovan G, Gray LJ, King JA, Khunti K, Davies MJ. The effects of high-intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015 Nov;16(11):942-61. doi: 10.1111/obr.12317.
- Yim SY, Cho KJ, Park CI, Yoon TS, Han DY, Kim SK, Lee HL. Effect of wheelchair ergometer training on spinal cord-injured paraplegics. Yonsei Med J. 1993 Sep;34(3):278-86. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1993.34.3.278.
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2008). 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
- Cowan RE, Callahan MK, Nash MS. The 6-min push test is reliable and predicts low fitness in spinal cord injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Oct;44(10):1993-2000. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31825cb3b6.
- Heymsfield SB, Smith R, Aulet M, Bensen B, Lichtman S, Wang J, Pierson RN Jr. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass: measurement by dual-photon absorptiometry. Am J Clin Nutr. 1990 Aug;52(2):214-8. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/52.2.214.
- Damirchi A, Tehrani BS, Alamdari KA, Babaei P. Influence of aerobic training and detraining on serum BDNF, insulin resistance, and metabolic risk factors in middle-aged men diagnosed with metabolic syndrome. Clin J Sport Med. 2014 Nov;24(6):513-8. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000082.
- Berg U, Bang P. Exercise and circulating insulin-like growth factor I. Horm Res. 2004;62 Suppl 1:50-8. doi: 10.1159/000080759.
- Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qual Health Res. 2007 May;17(5):690-8. doi: 10.1177/1049732307301488.
- Krueger, R. A. & Casey, M. A. (2009). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 201804087
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.