Evaluating the Performance and Efficiency of Zirconia Crowns in Treating Primary Teeth
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, 00963
- Damascus University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients within the age group of 4 to 8 years of age.
- Patients with good oral hygiene.
- Healthy children, i.e. free of any systematic diseases or any developmental disturbances of the teeth and jaws
- A minimal of two surfaces of caries in the targeted tooth
- Corresponding treated teeth has not got any crown earlier
- Patients with ECC as defined by the American Academy for Pediatric Dentistry.
- Cooperative patients who have a dental behavioral assessment of "definitely positive" according to Frankl behavior classification scale.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No patient is excluded by gender, race, or due to socio-economic backgrounds.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Locally Made Zirconia Crowns
One operator completes all the teeth preparing and restoring procedures.
Local anesthesia is achieved using Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% with Epinephrine 1:100,000.
The teeth are then isolated using a rubber dam.
After caries excavation, the teeth are prepared according to manufacturer instructions.
|
Occlusal reduction by decreasing the occlusal surface to less than the natural occlusal profile by about 1-1.5 mm roughly.
Proximal reduction by unfastening the interproximal contacts.
The tooth should be trimmed down circumferentially by around 0.5-1.25 mm as needed.
Subgingival reduction, leaving no undercuts or subgingival ridges, about 1-2 mm subgingivally on every area should be prepared.
Completion of the preparation by eliminating sharp lines and pointed angles to allow all prepared areas to be marginally rounded and smoothed.
Locally Made Zirconia Crowns are fixed using Glass Ionomer cement (Fuji- Jaban).
|
|
Experimental: ZR Zirconia Crwons NuSmile ® Crowns
One operator completes all the teeth preparing and restoring procedures.
Local anesthesia is achieved using Lidocaine Hydrochloride 2% with Epinephrine 1:100,000.
The teeth are then isolated using a rubber dam.
After caries excavation, the teeth are prepared according to manufacturer instructions.
(Same as Arm 1 Description)
|
Occlusal reduction by decreasing the occlusal surface to less than the natural occlusal profile by about 1-1.5 mm roughly.
Proximal reduction by unfastening the interproximal contacts.
The tooth should be trimmed down circumferentially by around 0.5-1.25 mm as needed.
Subgingival reduction, leaving no undercuts or subgingival ridges, about 1-2 mm subgingivally on every area should be prepared.
Completion of the preparation by eliminating sharp lines and pointed angles to allow all prepared areas to be marginally rounded and smoothed.
ZR Zirconia Crwons NuSmile ® Crowns are fixed using Glass Ionomer cement (Fuji- Jaban).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes of crowns integrity
Time Frame: Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Crowns integrity changes will be measured with the naked eye and the light cure device.
The scores are as follows: (0 = No crack, No fracture, No chip) (1 = Chip) (2 = Crack) (3 = Fracture).
(Cvar and Rygp 2005)
|
Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes of gingival index
Time Frame: Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
is measured by passing the periodontal probe tip gently within the sulcus around each crowned tooth.
The scores are as follows: (0 = normal gingiva) (1= mild inflammation) (2 = Moderate inflammation) (3 = severe inflammation).
(Loe and Silness 1963)
|
Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
|
Changes of crown marginal adaptation
Time Frame: Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Crown marginal adaptation will be measured at the buccal and lingual walls and will be referred to as either good for crowns with sealed margins or poor when the explorer detects an open margin.
(Farsi and Sharaf 2004)
|
Evaluating after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Mohamed AlTinawi, PhD., Professor - Pediatric Dentistry Department - Faculty of Dentistry - Damascus University
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Aiem E, Smail-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M. Aesthetic preformed paediatric crowns: systematic review. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Jul;27(4):273-282. doi: 10.1111/ipd.12260. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
- Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005 Dec;9(4):215-32. doi: 10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z. No abstract available.
- Fuks AB, Ram D, Eidelman E. Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent. 1999 Nov-Dec;21(7):445-8.
- Sharaf AA, Farsi NM. A clinical and radiographic evaluation of stainless steel crowns for primary molars. J Dent. 2004 Jan;32(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(03)00136-2.
- Mittal HC, Goyal A, Gauba K, Kapur A. Clinical Performance of Indirect Composite Onlays as Esthetic Alternative to Stainless Steel Crowns for Rehabilitation of a Large Carious Primary Molar. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2016;40(5):345-52. doi: 10.17796/1053-4628-40.5.345.
- Croll TP, Helpin ML. Preformed resin-veneered stainless steel crowns for restoration of primary incisors. Quintessence Int. 1996 May;27(5):309-13.
- Shah PV, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent. 2004 Sep-Oct;26(5):391-5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-Pedo-01-2018
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.