A Study Comparing User Experience of Different Delivery Devices for Glucagon
A Simulation Study Comparing Successful Administration, Time to Administer, and User Experience of Ready-to-Use Nasal Glucagon With Reconstitutable Injectable Glucagon
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
High Point, North Carolina, United States, 27265
- High Point Clinical Trials Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
All participants (Trained Users, Participants with Diabetes [PWDs] and Untrained Users):
- Are able to understand the purpose and procedure of the study and to give written informed consent to show willingness to participate in the study
Trained Users only:
- Are participants who are not diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus (T1DM) or Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)
- Are close friends/relatives of a patient with T1DM or T2DM on insulin
- Have not previously administered any rescue medications (e.g. epinephrine, glucagon, narcan or seizure medications)
Untrained Users only:
- Have not been diagnosed with T1DM or T2DM, and are not a Trained User of a person with T1DM or T2DM
- Have not previously administered any rescue medications (e.g. epinephrine, glucagon, narcan or seizure medications)
Exclusion Criteria:
All participants (Trained Users, PWDs and Untrained Users):
- In the opinion of the investigator or sponsor, are unsuitable for inclusion in the study
Trained Users and Untrained Users only (i.e. the participants involved in the simulations):
- Are currently enrolled in a clinical study involving any type of medical research judged not to be scientifically or medically compatible with this study
- Are judged by the investigator as being likely to have difficulty performing the administration due to physical, cognitive and/or severe psychiatric disorder
- Are judged by the investigator as being trained or experienced in performing rescue drug administration
- Are judged by the investigator as being trained or experienced in performing high-fidelity simulations of drug administration
- Have received formal training in a medical field, and/or worked in this field within the prior 5 years; or otherwise are judged by the investigator as being trained or experienced as a first responder
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Nasal Glucagon Device (NG)
Empty NG device administered to a manikin during simulations of severe hypoglycaemia emergencies.
No drug will be administered to humans.
|
NG devices will be provided empty of drug product
|
|
Active Comparator: Glucagon Emergency Kit (GEK)
Commercially available GEK delivered intramuscularly to a manikin during simulations of severe hypoglycaemia emergencies.
No drug will be administered to humans.
|
Used to administer glucagon intramuscularly (IM)
Administered IM via GEK
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Trained Users That Performed a Successful Administration for Each Device
Time Frame: Part A: Days 8 - 9 and Days 15 - 17
|
Percentage of trained users who found both devices and performed a successful administration of both rescue devices for both simulations.
|
Part A: Days 8 - 9 and Days 15 - 17
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Untrained Users That Perform a Successful Administration for Each Device
Time Frame: Part B: Day 1 and Days 8-9
|
Percentage of untrained users who found both devices and performed a successful administration of both rescue devices for both simulations.
|
Part B: Day 1 and Days 8-9
|
|
Average Time for Trained Users to Successfully Administer One Device Over the Other
Time Frame: Part A: Day 8 and Days 15-17
|
Average time for trained users who found both devices to successfully administer one rescue device over the other in Part A.
|
Part A: Day 8 and Days 15-17
|
|
Average Time for Untrained Users to Successfully Administer One Device Over the Other
Time Frame: Part B: Day 1 and Days 8-9
|
Average time for untrained users who found both devices to successfully administer one rescue device over the other in Part B. To successfully administer either NG or GEK, a participant must complete all of the critical steps for each device, and administer a complete dose.
|
Part B: Day 1 and Days 8-9
|
|
Percentage of Participants (Trained and Untrained Users) That Prefer One Device Over the Other
Time Frame: Part A: Days 8-9; Day 15-17 and Part B: Day 1; Days 8-9
|
Overall preference was measured via the Rescue Device Preference (RDP) questionnaire completed by Trained and Untrained participant users.
Participants rated their preference for NG or GEK by choosing one of five radio buttons: Strongly prefer NG, prefer NG, no preference, prefer GEK, strongly prefer GEK.
Data here represents pooling for Part A and Part B.
|
Part A: Days 8-9; Day 15-17 and Part B: Day 1; Days 8-9
|
|
Percentage of Participants (PWD) That Prefer One Device Over the Other
Time Frame: Part A: Days 15 - 17
|
Preference was measured by the PWD overall feeling of being safer during a severe low blood sugar event using Rescue Device Preference-Associated Person (RDP-AP).
Participants rated their preference for NG or GEK by choosing one of five radio buttons: Strongly prefer NG, prefer NG, no preference, prefer GEK, strongly prefer GEK.
|
Part A: Days 15 - 17
|
|
Percentage of Participants Trained and Untrained Users That Find One Device Easy to Use Over the Other
Time Frame: Part A: Days 15 -17 and Part B: Days 8 - 9
|
Ease of use was measured via the Individual Rescue Device Ease of Use (RDEU) Questionnaire by Trained and Untrained Participants.
Participants answered three questions about ease of use for each device by choosing one of five radio buttons: Strongly disagree, disagree, neither disagree nor agree, agree, strongly agree.
Data here represents pooling of Simulation 1 for Part A and Part B.
|
Part A: Days 15 -17 and Part B: Days 8 - 9
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 17156
- I8R-MC-IGBM (Other Identifier: Eli Lilly and Company)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.