Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Wound Infection

November 4, 2020 updated by: Uma Gunasekaran, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Remote Glycemic Management for Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Wound Infection

The goal of the study is to compare whether an integrated model of care between Foot Wound and Diabetes Clinic with use of remote glucose monitoring technology (Intervention Arm), as compared with usual care without the use of remote glucose monitoring technology (Control Arm), will result in 1) improved glycemic control, 2) improved ulcer and wound healing, 3) improved patient reported outcomes (PROs), 4) reduced long-term healthcare resource utilization, and 5) improved adherence to anti-glycemic therapy for patients with DFUWI and poor glycemic control over the course of a 6-month intervention period.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a two-arm non-randomized convenient pilot trial to assess impact of an active glycemic management model through remote glucose monitoring technology amongst patients with DFUWI and poor glycemic control at the Parkland Diabetes Foot & Wound clinic. The plan is to implement a remote glucose monitoring technology to facilitate improved glycemic management and control. A cellular enabled glucose meter that will upload blood glucose measurements to a cloud server accessible by providers who can remotely review glycemic trends and remotely provide patients with proactive recommendations for treatment adjustments will be used. Patients receiving services in the integrated care model (same day visits in the Foot Wound and Diabetes Clinics at Parkland) will be eligible for inclusion in the intervention arm which includes proactive glucose monitoring guided by remote glucose monitoring technology. Patients receiving usual care services (non-integrated care model clinic days where Foot Wound and Diabetes Clinic visits are on separate days) will be eligible for inclusion in the control arm. The expectation is that patients in the intervention arm will experience greater improvements in glycemic control, compared to the usual care model. The hypothesis is that improved glycemic control in these patients will result in faster healing of diabetic foot wound, infections or ulcers. The effectiveness of the technologically facilitated integrated model of care will be evaluated compared to the usual care using metrics for diabetic foot ulcers and wound healing, glycemic control, patient reported outcomes, health resource utilization and medication adherence after 6 months of intervention. The Telcare 2.0 BGM for remote self-blood glucose monitoring(FDA Cleared) will be used.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75235
        • Parkland Health and Hospital System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with diabetic foot ulcer &/or wound infection and poor glycemic control (A1C ≥ 8.5%) seen in the Foot Wound clinic at a public hospital.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 Diabetes
  • 18 years and older
  • A1C greater than or equal to 8.5% within the preceding 6 months
  • A1C greater than 8% on day of enrollment
  • Active diabetic foot ulcer or wound receiving treatment in the Foot Wound clinic at Parkland (ulcer that meets University of Texas Classification Grade 1 or 2 of any stage)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic osteomyelitis (even if completed active therapy)
  • Moderate/severe lower limb infection (per Infectious Diseases Society of America criteria)
  • Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Wound Infection on Charcot Foot
  • Any serious/unstable medical condition that interferes with treatment assignment
  • Ankle Brachial Index less than 0.7 or toe pressures less than 30mmHg
  • Unwilling to participate or receive injectable treatment or unable to keep appointments
  • Non-English or Non-Spanish speakers
  • Pregnant or planning to become pregnant

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Intervention Group
A Telcare 2.0 BGM, which is FDA cleared, will be used to upload blood glucose measurements to a cloud server accessible by providers. Intervention group will participate in an integrated care model where they will attend Diabetic Clinic and Foot Wound appointments on the same day.
Device: Telcare 2.0 BGM
Blood glucose meter that uploads blood glucose measurements to a cloud server that providers can access and use to monitor patients' glycemic trends.
Control Group
Control Group will receive usual care (a non-integrated care model where Diabetes Clinic and Foot Wound appointments are on separate days.) These patients will not receive a blood monitoring glucose device.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in HbA1c
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Glycemic control
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients with lower A1C and insulin use
6 months
Foot ulcer and/or wound healing
Time Frame: 6 months
Complete wound healing as defined by University of Texas Health System
6 months
Patient reported satisfaction with diabetes treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported outcome assessment questionnaire using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfcation Questionnaire (DTSQ) [Scale range 0-48]; lower scores represent worse outcomes
6 months
Patient reported health status
Time Frame: 6 months
Self-reported outcome assessment questionnaires using the 5 level EQ-5D health status measure (EQ-5D-5L) [Scale range 5-25]; higher scores represent worse outcome
6 months
Proportion of patients with emergency department visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients with emergency department visits following enrollment
6 months
Proportion of days covered score
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of days covered score represents an indirect measure of medication adherence and represents the proportion of days medication was dispensed (numerator) over the total potential days the medication should have been dispensed (denominator)
6 months
Proportion of patients with hospitalization
Time Frame: 6 months
Proportion of patients with hospitalization following enrollment
6 months
Frequency of invasive procedures
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number and type of invasive procedures related to diabetic foot ulcer and or wound infection
6 months
Number of outpatient visits
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number of outpatient visits for general or specialized care (including virtual visits) during trial
6 months
Number of casts and boots used for treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Total number of casts and boots used for treatment related to diabetic foot ulcer and or wound infection
6 months
Overall hospital incurred patient-specific cost
Time Frame: 6 months
Cost (in US $) of overall patient care for Parkland during study enrollment
6 months
Cost of glycemic management during study
Time Frame: 6 months
• Cost of glycemic management during trial, including cost of encounters (including telephone and virtual visits), testing supplies, drug costs, technology costs specifically related to glycemic management
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Frequency of hypoglycemic events
Time Frame: 6 months
Comparison of frequency of severe hypoglycemic symptoms for usual care versus intervention arm
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Parkland Health and Hospital System

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Uma Gunasekaran, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 9, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 2, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 17, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STU 042018-008

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings