Qualitative & Quantitative Comparison of Hydrostatic vs Vacuum Casting Methods in Trans-Tibial Amputees

July 11, 2019 updated by: Heather Appling, Loma Linda University
The purpose of this graduate research study is to compare hydrostatic and vacuum casting techniques using patient mobility indicators, volume displacement, comfort, and overall satisfaction outcomes in trans-tibial amputees.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Visit 1

  • Informed Consent
  • Subject will be casted using both the hydrostatic and vacuum system techniques

Visit 2 (7-10 days after Visit 1)

  • One of two sockets will be randomly assigned and fitted/aligned by investigators
  • Subject will be asked to perform a Timed Up and Go Test followed by a Six-Minute Walk Test
  • Subject will fill out a comfort questionnaire for the prosthesis worn

Visit 3 (7 to 10 days after Visit 2)

• Subject will be asked to do the same testing as you performed in Visit 2

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92350
        • Loma Linda Universtiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Trans-tibial amputation, unilateral
  • Able to walk for a six-minute minimum w/o a break
  • Amputation history of at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria:

  • Syme amputation
  • Physical disability or injury affecting a natural gait pattern
  • Ulcers or blisters on the residual limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: vacuum casting
Vacuum casting will be performed using the Ottobock vacuum casting system. For our vacuum casting procedures, we will be following the protocols outlined in the Harmony Fabrication Quick Guide
Other: vacuum casting
Participants will be cast using vacuum casting (Ottobock Harmony) method. The method of casting will be randomized via RNG. Participants will be fitted with both sockets and dynamic alignment procedures will be performed. This 15-minute fitting and alignment period will address any extreme gait deviations and initial socket discomforts. After fitting, the participant will then be given a 15-minute adjustment period to wear the device. We will then begin the assessment phase, beginning with the timed Get-Up and Go test and followed by the 6-Minute Walk test. Each patient will perform 3 rounds of each test and patient order will be determined at random. The participants will be given a 10 min break between each series of tests. At the end, a questionnaire will be given.
Active Comparator: hydrostatic casting
For the aqua casting system, we will be using an in-house manufactured device. This device will be created following guidelines from the PCAST Technical Manual
Other: hydrostatic casting
Participants will be cast using aqua casting method. The method of casting will be randomized via RNG. Participants will be fitted with both sockets and dynamic alignment procedures will be performed. This 15-minute fitting and alignment period will address any extreme gait deviations and initial socket discomforts. After fitting, the participant will then be given a 15-minute adjustment period to wear the device. We will then begin the assessment phase, beginning with the timed Get-Up and Go test and followed by the 6-Minute Walk test. Each patient will perform 3 rounds of each test and patient order will be determined at random. The participants will be given a 10 min break between each series of tests. At the end, a questionnaire will be given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: between 7-10- days after study enrollment
Participants will walk in a 100-ft hallway on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
between 7-10- days after study enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume Calculation
Time Frame: between 7-10- days after study enrollment
The Ohio Willow Wood Omega Tracer 3-dimensional image capture device and associated Omega shape capture software will be used to determine the volumes of each socket type, comparing the vacuum and aqua casting volume metrics. The scanning variables of width, depth, and length will determine the total displacement of each socket type. It has been determined that laser scanning is a valid and reliable method for accurately measuring volume fluctuations between casting methods.
between 7-10- days after study enrollment
Volume Calculation
Time Frame: between 14-20 days after study enrollment
The Ohio Willow Wood Omega Tracer 3-dimensional image capture device and associated Omega shape capture software will be used to determine the volumes of each socket type, comparing the vacuum and aqua casting volume metrics. The scanning variables of width, depth, and length will determine the total displacement of each socket type. It has been determined that laser scanning is a valid and reliable method for accurately measuring volume fluctuations between casting methods.
between 14-20 days after study enrollment
Six-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: between 14-20 days after study enrollment
Participants will walk in a 100-ft hallway on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
between 14-20 days after study enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Loma Linda University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Heather Appling, MSOP, Loma Linda University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 11, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 5180404

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings