Qualitative & Quantitative Comparison of Hydrostatic vs Vacuum Casting Methods in Trans-Tibial Amputees

July 11, 2019 updated by: Heather Appling, Loma Linda University
The purpose of this graduate research study is to compare hydrostatic and vacuum casting techniques using patient mobility indicators, volume displacement, comfort, and overall satisfaction outcomes in trans-tibial amputees.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Visit 1

  • Informed Consent
  • Subject will be casted using both the hydrostatic and vacuum system techniques

Visit 2 (7-10 days after Visit 1)

  • One of two sockets will be randomly assigned and fitted/aligned by investigators
  • Subject will be asked to perform a Timed Up and Go Test followed by a Six-Minute Walk Test
  • Subject will fill out a comfort questionnaire for the prosthesis worn

Visit 3 (7 to 10 days after Visit 2)

• Subject will be asked to do the same testing as you performed in Visit 2

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Loma Linda, California, United States, 92350
        • Loma Linda Universtiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria :

  • 18 years of age or older
  • Trans-tibial amputation, unilateral
  • Able to walk for a six-minute minimum w/o a break
  • Amputation history of at least 6 months

Exclusion criteria:

  • Syme amputation
  • Physical disability or injury affecting a natural gait pattern
  • Ulcers or blisters on the residual limb

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: vacuum casting
Vacuum casting will be performed using the Ottobock vacuum casting system. For our vacuum casting procedures, we will be following the protocols outlined in the Harmony Fabrication Quick Guide
Participants will be cast using vacuum casting (Ottobock Harmony) method. The method of casting will be randomized via RNG. Participants will be fitted with both sockets and dynamic alignment procedures will be performed. This 15-minute fitting and alignment period will address any extreme gait deviations and initial socket discomforts. After fitting, the participant will then be given a 15-minute adjustment period to wear the device. We will then begin the assessment phase, beginning with the timed Get-Up and Go test and followed by the 6-Minute Walk test. Each patient will perform 3 rounds of each test and patient order will be determined at random. The participants will be given a 10 min break between each series of tests. At the end, a questionnaire will be given.
Active Comparator: hydrostatic casting
For the aqua casting system, we will be using an in-house manufactured device. This device will be created following guidelines from the PCAST Technical Manual
Participants will be cast using aqua casting method. The method of casting will be randomized via RNG. Participants will be fitted with both sockets and dynamic alignment procedures will be performed. This 15-minute fitting and alignment period will address any extreme gait deviations and initial socket discomforts. After fitting, the participant will then be given a 15-minute adjustment period to wear the device. We will then begin the assessment phase, beginning with the timed Get-Up and Go test and followed by the 6-Minute Walk test. Each patient will perform 3 rounds of each test and patient order will be determined at random. The participants will be given a 10 min break between each series of tests. At the end, a questionnaire will be given.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: between 7-10- days after study enrollment
Participants will walk in a 100-ft hallway on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
between 7-10- days after study enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Volume Calculation
Time Frame: between 7-10- days after study enrollment
The Ohio Willow Wood Omega Tracer 3-dimensional image capture device and associated Omega shape capture software will be used to determine the volumes of each socket type, comparing the vacuum and aqua casting volume metrics. The scanning variables of width, depth, and length will determine the total displacement of each socket type. It has been determined that laser scanning is a valid and reliable method for accurately measuring volume fluctuations between casting methods.
between 7-10- days after study enrollment
Volume Calculation
Time Frame: between 14-20 days after study enrollment
The Ohio Willow Wood Omega Tracer 3-dimensional image capture device and associated Omega shape capture software will be used to determine the volumes of each socket type, comparing the vacuum and aqua casting volume metrics. The scanning variables of width, depth, and length will determine the total displacement of each socket type. It has been determined that laser scanning is a valid and reliable method for accurately measuring volume fluctuations between casting methods.
between 14-20 days after study enrollment
Six-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: between 14-20 days after study enrollment
Participants will walk in a 100-ft hallway on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes.
between 14-20 days after study enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heather Appling, MSOP, Loma Linda University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 18, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 5180404

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hydrostatic Vacuum Casting

Clinical Trials on vacuum casting

Subscribe