Sophie Pilot Implementation and Assessment

November 29, 2020 updated by: Boston Medical Center

Comparing the Sophie RA-CBT System and Telemedically-delivered CBT: a Pilot Implementation Study

Evidence-based interventions using cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and self-management education have been demonstrated to effectively treat symptoms of depression and improve the quality of life in populations with chronic illness. Research indicates that CBT is the most effective psychosocial treatment for depression; as effective as pharmacotherapy and as effective as adding another medication for patients who do not respond to one antidepressant alone. Despite the existence of proven efficacious treatments for depression, however, fewer than half of patients for whom depression treatment is indicated receive the services they need. Access barriers (i.e., transportation, insurance coverage), limited clinician availability (i.e., long waitlists, difficulty finding a provider), and competing (and time-consuming) medical priorities contribute to inadequate depression treatment for individuals with serious chronic illness. In this research the investigators will conduct a pilot randomized trial to compare results from implementation of two CBT strategies iHope and Sophie.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

A pre-implementation pilot study will be conducted with 20 adult patients diagnosed with advanced (Stage 3 or 4) cancer who screen positive for moderate depression and are receiving care at the Solomont Center for Hematology and Medical Oncology at Boston Medical Center (BMC) with the following specific aims:

  1. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) as a guide, design a pilot implementation strategy for introducing the Sophie CBT system and iHope system into the clinical context of care (Months 1-4)
  2. Conduct a pre-implementation pilot study with randomization of 20 cancer patients who screen positive for depression and/or anxiety into two arms with Sophie CBT or iHope telemedicine (10 participants each) to: a) assess the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of implementing the Sophie CBT and iHope interventions in an ambulatory cancer treatment center and b) evaluate the potential impact of the Sophie CBT and iHope interventions on measures of depression, anxiety, coping, and quality of life for cancer patients with comorbid depression (Months 5-10)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with stage 3 or 4 cancer receiving care at Solomont Cancer Center
  • GAD score >10 AND/OR positive screening for moderate to severe depressive symptoms (PHQ-8>9).
  • Comfortable using tablet, phone and computer
  • Has telephone access
  • Speaks English
  • Lives in greater Boston area

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients without the capacity to provide informed consent
  • Ongoing substance use disorder
  • Patients with Schizophrenia and Dementia

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Sophie CBT
The Sophie Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) intervention is a tablet-based computerized CBT and self-management education intervention that consists of an evidence-based cognitive behavioral therapy self-management curriculum divided into 6 discrete modules. Patients will have up to 8 weeks to work through the modules on the tablet.
Behavioral: Sophie CBT System
The Sophie CBT system is a tablet-based system that delivers self-paced cognitive behavioral therapy educational curriculum in the format of 6 discrete modules.
Active Comparator: iHope CBT
iHope CBT is a telemedically-delivered CBT package. The iHope system comprises a HIPAA-compliant platform on which real, live, licensed clinicians provide cognitive behavioral therapy via video conferencing, phone calls, and text messaging. iHope will be delivered on subjects' preferred electronic device (mobile phone, laptop, tablet).
Behavioral: iHope CBT
Licensed therapists will use the iHope HIPAA-compliant telemedicine platform to deliver cognitive behavioral therapy to patients via telephone, videoconferencing, and/or text chat.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in depressive symptoms
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
Changes in depressive symptoms will be measured using the PHQ-8, which is an 8-item scale with scores ranging from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicative of more depressive symptoms
baseline, 8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in anxiety
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) will be used to assess changes in anxiety. The GAD-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that asks how often an individual has been bothered by a given item over the last 2 weeks. Scores range from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day.") A higher overall score indicates a greater level of anxiety.
baseline, 8 weeks
Change in coping
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
Changes in coping will be assessed using the Ways of Coping scale which is a 66 item scale with potential responses from 1 to 4, with higher scores indicative of more frequent use of a particular strategy.
baseline, 8 weeks
Changes in quality of life
Time Frame: baseline, 8 weeks
Changes in quality of life will be assessed using the Quality of Life Scale (QOLS), which is a 15-item scale with potential responses ranging from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating a higher level of satisfaction with quality of life.
baseline, 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Medical Center

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Suzanne Mitchell, MD, Boston Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 5, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 29, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-37919
  • 4153360 (Other Grant/Funding Number: CIIS Evans Center)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings