Registry and Screening Tool to Identify Children With Asthma Likely to Benefit From Home Assessment and Remediation (CREST)
Utilizing a Clinical Registry and Environmental Screening Tool to Identify Children With Asthma Most Likely to Benefit From Home Assessment and Remediation
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44109
- MetroHealth Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Enrolled in the MetroHealth School Health Program (signed parental consent on file in Epic electronic health record)
- Has diagnosis of asthma on active problem list OR was seen in Emergency Department or Express Care in past 12 months for asthma related diagnosis, OR has asthma related rescue or controller inhaled medication on current medication list.
Exclusion Criteria:
• Does not meet inclusion criteria.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: CONTROL
Control group
|
|
|
Experimental: GROUP A no referral
Screener does not document need for home visit or medical legal partnership referral.
|
Regular care in the School Health Program
|
|
Experimental: GROUP B1 home assessment only
Screener documents need for home assessment.
Home assessment does not document need for home remediation.
Screener does not document need for medical legal partnership.
|
Home assessment for environmental hazards according to protocol established by Environmental Health Watch (Healthy Home Audit https://www.ehw.org/healthy-home-audit/)
|
|
Experimental: GROUP B2 home assessment only
Screener documents need for home assessment.
Home assessment does not document need for home remediation.
Screener documents need for medical legal partnership.
|
Home assessment for environmental hazards according to protocol established by Environmental Health Watch (Healthy Home Audit https://www.ehw.org/healthy-home-audit/)
Medical Legal Partnership referral as described by the National Center for Medical Legal partnerships and others (Beck AF, Identifying and treating a substandard housing cluster using a medical-legal partnership.
Pediatrics.
2012;130(5):831-838)
|
|
Experimental: GROUP C1 home assessment and remediation
Screener documents need for home assessment.
Home assessment documents need for home remediation.
Screener does not document need for medical legal partnership.
|
Home assessment for environmental hazards according to protocol established by Environmental Health Watch (Healthy Home Audit https://www.ehw.org/healthy-home-audit/)
Low level home remediation according to previously established protocol (Kercsmar CM, Dearborn DG, Schluchter M, et al.
Reduction in asthma morbidity in children as a result of home remediation aimed at moisture sources.
Environ Health Perspect.
2006;114(10):1574-80)
|
|
Experimental: GROUP C2 home assessment and remediation
Screener documents need for home assessment.
Home assessment documents need for home remediation.
Screener documents need for medical legal partnership.
|
Home assessment for environmental hazards according to protocol established by Environmental Health Watch (Healthy Home Audit https://www.ehw.org/healthy-home-audit/)
Medical Legal Partnership referral as described by the National Center for Medical Legal partnerships and others (Beck AF, Identifying and treating a substandard housing cluster using a medical-legal partnership.
Pediatrics.
2012;130(5):831-838)
Low level home remediation according to previously established protocol (Kercsmar CM, Dearborn DG, Schluchter M, et al.
Reduction in asthma morbidity in children as a result of home remediation aimed at moisture sources.
Environ Health Perspect.
2006;114(10):1574-80)
|
|
Experimental: D medical legal partnership only
Screener does not document need for home assessment.
Screener does not document need for medical legal partnership.
|
Medical Legal Partnership referral as described by the National Center for Medical Legal partnerships and others (Beck AF, Identifying and treating a substandard housing cluster using a medical-legal partnership.
Pediatrics.
2012;130(5):831-838)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Asthma Control Test Score
Time Frame: baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
Score on: Asthma Control Test (for children 12 and over) or Child Asthma Control Test (for children under 12) The Asthma Control Test is used to identify asthma control with scores ranging from a minimum of 5 (poor control) to a maximum of 25 (complete control) A score of over 19 indicated well controlled asthma.
|
baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in number of Asthma Related Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
Self reported number of asthma related emergency department visits in past 4 months
|
baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
|
Change in number of Asthma Related Hospitalizations
Time Frame: baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
Self reported number of asthma related hospitalizations in past 4 months
|
baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
|
Change in number of Asthma related Express Care or Urgent Care visits
Time Frame: baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
Self reported number of asthma related Express Care or Urgent Care visits in past 4 months
|
baseline and 3 and 6 months after intervention
|
|
Educational Outcome: attendance
Time Frame: in past 3 months
|
number of absences
|
in past 3 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Vanessa Maier, MD, MPH, MetroHealth Medical Center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB18-00771
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.