A Clinical Study of Tranilast in the Treatment of Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS)

June 1, 2019 updated by: Hongmei Song, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Efficacy and Safety of Tranilast in Patients With Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndrome (CAPS): A Single-Arm Prospective Cohort Study

This is a prospective cohort study to observe the efficacy and safety of tranilast in CAPS patients. The investigators would analyze the changes in Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index (AIDAI) before and after treatment as well as changes in inflammatory markers, patients' and physician's global assessment of disease activity to determine the efficacy and safety of tranilast.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Seventy-one patients with CAPS will be recruited. After signing the informed consent, they will be administrated with tranilast (For juvenile patients, 5mg/kg.d with a maximum dose of 0.3g per day; For adult patients, the dose is 0.1g each time, three times a day). These patients will be followed up for 6 months. AIDAI is recorded by patients' or their parents one month before the start of treatment, and at the 1st, 3rd and 6th month after the treatment. Inflammatory markers, and patients' and physician's global assessment of disease activity will be assessed during the 1st, 3rd and 6th month follow-up. Side effects will be monitored and recorded as well. Experimental data before and after the administration of tranilast will be analyzed and be statistically processed, to figure out whether tranilast is effective and safe for CAPS patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
71

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100730
        • Recruiting
        • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hongmei Song, Doctor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Linqing Zhong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients must meet the following diagnostic criteria of CAPS and have pathogenic mutation(s) in NLRP3 gene.

    1. Raised inflammatory markers (CRP/SAA) (mandatory criteria)

    2. ≥2 of 6 CAPS typical signs/symptoms:

      1. Urticaria-like rash;
      2. Cold/stress triggered episodes;
      3. Sensorineural hearing loss;
      4. Musculoskeletal symptoms (arthralgia/arthritis/myalgia);
      5. Chronic aseptic meningitis;
      6. Skeletal abnormalities (epiphyseal overgrowth/frontal bossing).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients will not be included if meets any of the following criteria:

    1. Being treated with IL-1 inhibitor, other biological agents and immunosuppressants
    2. Pregnant and lactating women
    3. Serious organ function failure, expected life time less than 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Tranilast
5mg/kg.d for juvenile patients with a maximum dose of 0.3g per day; 0.1g each time, three times a day for adults patients
Drug: Tranilast
5mg/kg.d for juvenile patients with a maximum dose of 0.3g per day; 0.1g each time, three times a day for adults patients
Other Names:
  • Rizaben

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index score after 6-month treatment over baseline
Time Frame: The previous 1 month before treatment and the 6th month after treatment
Patients or their parents completed a 1-month (31 days) prospective diary with 12 yes/no items( Fever ≥38°C, Overall symptoms, Abdominal pain, Nausea/vomiting, Diarrhoea, Headaches, Chest pain, Painful nodes, Arthralgia or myalgia, Swelling of the joints, Eye manifestations, Skin rash) at the previous 1 month before treatment, and the 6th month after treatment . Each item of this diary was dichotomised as no (0)=absence of symptom or yes (1)=presence of symptom. The calculation of the Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index score is straightforward, consisting of the sum of all 12 items (0-372 in a month of 31 days). Higher values represent higher disease activity.
The previous 1 month before treatment and the 6th month after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index score at the 1st and 3rd month over baseline
Time Frame: The previous 1 month before treatment and the 1st and 3rd month after treatment
Patients or their parents completed a 1-month (31 days) prospective diary with 12 yes/no items( Fever ≥38°C, Overall symptoms, Abdominal pain, Nausea/vomiting, Diarrhoea, Headaches, Chest pain, Painful nodes, Arthralgia or myalgia, Swelling of the joints, Eye manifestations, Skin rash) at the previous 1 month before treatment, and the 1st and 3rd month after treatment . Each item of this diary was dichotomised as no (0)=absence of symptom or yes (1)=presence of symptom. The calculation of the Auto-Inflammatory Diseases Activity Index score is straightforward, consisting of the sum of all 12 items (0-372 in a month of 31 days). Higher values represent higher disease activity.
The previous 1 month before treatment and the 1st and 3rd month after treatment
Changes in inflammatory markers, including C-reactin protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum amyloid protein, interleukin-1β and interleukin-18， at 1, 3 and 6 months over baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment
C-reactin protein, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, serum amyloid protein, interleukin-1β and interleukin-18 are measured at baseline，1, 3 and 6 months after treatment.
Baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment
Changes in physician global assessment of disease activity on a 0-10 visual analog scale (VAS) at 1, 3 and 6 months over baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment
Visual analogue scale (VAS) for overall disease activity were completed by the physician at each visit (Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment).
Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment
Changes in parent/patient global assessment of well-being on a 0-10 visual analogue score (VAS) at 1, 3 and 6 months over baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment
Visual analogue scale (VAS) for overall disease activity were completed by the parent/patient at each visit (Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment).
Baseline and 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment
Changes in CSF white blood cell count for CINCA patients
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment.
For CINCA patients, Lumbar punctures (LPs) were performed at baseline and 6 months after treatment.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment.
Changes in MRI of the brain and inner ear for CINCA patients
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment.
For CINCA patients, MRIs with gadoliniumenhanced fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences of the brain and inner ear were performed and scored at baseline and 6 months after treatment.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment.
Changes in audiology data for CINCA patients
Time Frame: Baseline and 6 months after treatment.
For CINCA patients, Hearing assessment included audiological evaluations. Outcomes in each ear were categorised as 'stable' or 'worsened', according to a modification of the American Speech and Hearing Association (ASHA) criteria, comparing the results at 6 months after treatment over baseline.
Baseline and 6 months after treatment.
Number of participants with adverse effect
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Treatment-related adverse effect, including abnormal liver function, hematuria and decreased white blood cells
Up to 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hongmei Song, Peking Union Medical College Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 23, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2024

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 14, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 22, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 1, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ZS-1921

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings