Intermittent vs Continuous Walking in People With Multiple Sclerosis

May 11, 2022 updated by: Evan T. Cohen, SHRP Department of Rehabilitation and Movemen, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Intermittent vs. Continuous Walking Training in People With Multiple Sclerosis: a Comparison of Effectiveness

This study will compare the effectiveness of a traditional, continuous walking rehabilitation program for people with MS to the novel intervention of an intermittent or interval walking rehabilitation program. Half of the participants will receive the continuous walking program while the other half will receive the novel intermittent walking program.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Suspended

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The typical rehabilitation of walking difficulties for people with MS has included practice walking. In general, this includes training to build walking endurance by having the person with MS walk until he/she becomes tired and needs to stop. Although this model has been used successfully to treat people with other diagnoses, it has limited effectiveness in improving walking ability and endurance in people with MS because of fatigue. Recently, a different model has been considered: intermittent or interval walking training. Interval walking training is organized such that seated rest breaks are intentionally interspersed between walking training bouts that end before the person with MS becomes too tired to continue. Exploratory research has shown that people with MS can walk faster and farther when using interval walking training, and may have more improvements in walking ability and endurance after using interval walking training. This study will compare the effectiveness of the traditional model of continuous walking training to the promising new model of interval walking training. This will help to determine whether interval or continuous walking training is superior in improving walking ability and endurance in people with MS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • Hartford, Connecticut, United States, 06112
        • Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis - Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 71 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Self-identified difficulty walking
  • Definitive diagnosis of multiple sclerosis from a neurologist
  • Signed an approved consent form
  • Ability to ambulate for unaided for 6-minutes continuously with or without an assistive device (e.g. a cane or brace)
  • Has not had a multiple sclerosis relapse in the past 6 weeks

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to complete assessments
  • Unwilling or able to complete assessments and or intervention without the use of portable functional electrical stimulation devices
  • Medical history of concomitant condition unrelated to multiple sclerosis which may impact results including: other neurological conditions including stroke, Parkinson's disease, or orthopedic, or cardiopulmonary conditions that affect walking
  • Had a major change in exercise habits in the past three months
  • Individuals reporting change in any disease modifying treatment or steroid use during the past 6 weeks
  • Unable to walk for 6 minutes continuously without physical assistance
  • Medical history of unstable angina, uncontrolled cardiac dysrhythmias causing symptoms, symptomatic severe aortic stenosis, uncontrolled symptomatic heart failure, acute pulmonary embolus or pulmonary infarction, history of deep vein thrombosis, acute myocarditis or pericarditis, acute systemic infection, uncontrolled hypertension, and uncontrolled diabetes
  • Has an abnormal response to exercise
  • Cannot adhere to protocol
  • Determined to be unsafe at the discretion of the research team including individuals unwilling to wear safety "gait belt" during testing or not willing to wear proper footwear.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Continuous Walking
Participants in the Continuous Walking (CONT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the CONT group will be to complete a 6-minute long walk without rest breaks
Other: Walking
Participants will undergo training in either the CONT or INT walking interventions 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions.
Experimental: Interval Walking
Participants in the Interval Walking (INT) arm will undergo training 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions. The intervention for the (INT) group will be to complete three 2-minute-long walks with 2-minute seated rest breaks between each walk
Other: Walking
Participants will undergo training in either the CONT or INT walking interventions 2x/week for 6 weeks for a total plan of 12 training sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 6-minute Walk Test distance
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Is a measurement of the distance (in meters) walked at best pace in six minutes.
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in 12-item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
A survey that measures a participant's perception of how his/her walking ability is affected by multiple sclerosis. The scale ranges from 0-100 with lower scores representing a lesser impact of multiple sclerosis on the participant's walking ability. There are no subscales.
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Change in Fatigue Severity Scale score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
A survey that measures a participant's perception of the impact of the symptom of fatigue on a person's ability to participate in life roles. The scale ranges from from 9-63, with lower scores representing a lower impact of fatigue on the ability to perform the activities listed in the scale.There are no subscales.
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Change in Step Length
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
The distance (in centimeters) traversed in one step from initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot.
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Change in Step Time
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
The time (in seconds) taken to complete one step from initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot.
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Change in Stride Velocity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
The speed with which it takes a person to complete one stride from initial contact of one foot to the next initial contact of the same foot
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
Change in Cadence
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)
The number of steps (the initial contact of one foot to the initial contact of the opposite foot taken per minute
Baseline, 6 weeks (after intervention), and 12 weeks (6-week follow-up)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital
City University of New York, School of Public Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Evan T Cohen, PhD, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 28, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 16, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 24, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 11, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro2019000453

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings