Machine-Generated Mortality Estimates and Nudges to Promote Advance Care Planning Discussion Among Cancer Patients

April 23, 2020 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Using Machine-Generated Mortality Estimates and Behavioral Nudges to Promote Advance Care Planning Discussion Among Cancer Patients

This study will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a health system initiative using machine learning algorithms and behavioral nudges to prompt oncologists to have serious illness conversations with patients at high-risk of short-term mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Patients with cancer often undergo costly therapy and acute care utilization that is discordant with their wishes, particularly at the end of life. Early serious illness conversations (SIC) improve goal-concordant care, and accurate prognostication is critical to inform the timing and content of these discussions. This study will use a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a health system initiative using machine learning algorithms and behavioral nudges to prompt oncologists to have serious illness conversations with patients at high-risk of short-term mortality. Oncology practices will be randomly assigned in sequential four-week blocks to receive the intervention.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
78

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Penn Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Care for adults with cancer at the following clinics at Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine

    • Breast Oncology
    • Gastrointestinal Oncology
    • Genitourinary Oncology
    • Lymphoma
    • Melanoma and Central Nervous System Oncology
    • Myeloma
    • Thoracic / Head and Neck Oncology
  • Care for adults with cancer at the Pennsylvania Hospital Oncology clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Providers who care for only patients with benign hematologic disorders
  • Providers who see only genetic consults
  • Providers who see less than 12 high-risk patients in either the pre- or post- intervention periods
  • Visits for patients with lung cancer who are enrolled in an ongoing palliative care clinical trial that may lead to more SICs
  • Patient visits that are for oncology genetics consults (such patients may still be included if they see their primary oncologist during the trial)
  • Providers who have not undergone serious illness conversation program training (SIC)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
No Intervention: Control
Clinicians will receive current standard communications regarding serious illness performance.
Experimental: Mortality Estimates and Nudges
Clinicians will receive a weekly email with upcoming patients that have high mortality estimates to consider for a serious illness conversation. Clinicians will have the opportunity to review the list and pre-commit (using an opt-out design) to patients appropriate for a conversation. They will receive a nudge on the day of the patient visit through a text message reminding them of their pre-commitment to conduct a serious illness conversation
Behavioral: Nudge
Oncology practices will be randomly assigned to receive an intervention, in which individual clinicians will receive a weekly audit email detailing how many serious illness conversations (SIC) they have had compared to the recommended level, and a link to a list of their patients scheduled in clinic next week at high risk of short-term mortality as identified by a mortality prediction algorithm. Clinicians will have the chance to review the opt-out list and pre-commit to a serious illness conversation with appropriate patients. Clinicians will receive nudge on the day of the patient visit via text message reminding them of their pre-commitment to conduct a serious illness conversation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented serious illness conversation (SIC)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients that have an outpatient oncology visit with documentation of a serious illness conversation (SIC)
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented SIC among those identified as high-risk by the algorithm
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients who have an outpatient oncology visit and are identified as high-risk by the machine learning algorithm with documentation of a SIC
16 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented advanced care planning
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients with documentation of advanced care planning.
16 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented serious illness conversation (SIC) including follow-up
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients that have an outpatient oncology visit with documentation of a serious illness conversation (SIC) including follow-up
40 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented SIC among those identified as high-risk by the algorithm including follow-up
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients who have an outpatient oncology visit and are identified as high-risk by the machine learning algorithm with documentation of a SIC including follow-up
40 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented advanced care planning including follow-up
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients with documentation of advanced care planning including follow-up
40 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oncology Evaluation Center admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of Oncology Evaluation Center admissions
40 weeks
Healthcare utilization and receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life
Time Frame: 40 weeks
Healthcare utilization in the last 30 days of life in Penn Medicine facilities including acute care utilization as above and receipt of chemotherapy
40 weeks
Number of Emergency department admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of emergency department admissions
40 weeks
Inpatient admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of inpatient hospital admissions
40 weeks
Intensive care unit admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of intensive care unit admissions
40 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Pennsylvania

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mitesh S Patel, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 19, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 23, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 833178

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings