Machine-Generated Mortality Estimates and Nudges to Promote Advance Care Planning Discussion Among Cancer Patients

April 23, 2020 updated by: University of Pennsylvania

A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Using Machine-Generated Mortality Estimates and Behavioral Nudges to Promote Advance Care Planning Discussion Among Cancer Patients

This study will use a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a health system initiative using machine learning algorithms and behavioral nudges to prompt oncologists to have serious illness conversations with patients at high-risk of short-term mortality.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with cancer often undergo costly therapy and acute care utilization that is discordant with their wishes, particularly at the end of life. Early serious illness conversations (SIC) improve goal-concordant care, and accurate prognostication is critical to inform the timing and content of these discussions. This study will use a stepped-wedge, cluster randomized trial to evaluate the effect of a health system initiative using machine learning algorithms and behavioral nudges to prompt oncologists to have serious illness conversations with patients at high-risk of short-term mortality. Oncology practices will be randomly assigned in sequential four-week blocks to receive the intervention.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

78

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19103
        • Penn Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Care for adults with cancer at the following clinics at Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine

    • Breast Oncology
    • Gastrointestinal Oncology
    • Genitourinary Oncology
    • Lymphoma
    • Melanoma and Central Nervous System Oncology
    • Myeloma
    • Thoracic / Head and Neck Oncology
  • Care for adults with cancer at the Pennsylvania Hospital Oncology clinic

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Providers who care for only patients with benign hematologic disorders
  • Providers who see only genetic consults
  • Providers who see less than 12 high-risk patients in either the pre- or post- intervention periods
  • Visits for patients with lung cancer who are enrolled in an ongoing palliative care clinical trial that may lead to more SICs
  • Patient visits that are for oncology genetics consults (such patients may still be included if they see their primary oncologist during the trial)
  • Providers who have not undergone serious illness conversation program training (SIC)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Clinicians will receive current standard communications regarding serious illness performance.
Experimental: Mortality Estimates and Nudges
Clinicians will receive a weekly email with upcoming patients that have high mortality estimates to consider for a serious illness conversation. Clinicians will have the opportunity to review the list and pre-commit (using an opt-out design) to patients appropriate for a conversation. They will receive a nudge on the day of the patient visit through a text message reminding them of their pre-commitment to conduct a serious illness conversation
Oncology practices will be randomly assigned to receive an intervention, in which individual clinicians will receive a weekly audit email detailing how many serious illness conversations (SIC) they have had compared to the recommended level, and a link to a list of their patients scheduled in clinic next week at high risk of short-term mortality as identified by a mortality prediction algorithm. Clinicians will have the chance to review the opt-out list and pre-commit to a serious illness conversation with appropriate patients. Clinicians will receive nudge on the day of the patient visit via text message reminding them of their pre-commitment to conduct a serious illness conversation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented serious illness conversation (SIC)
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients that have an outpatient oncology visit with documentation of a serious illness conversation (SIC)
16 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented SIC among those identified as high-risk by the algorithm
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients who have an outpatient oncology visit and are identified as high-risk by the machine learning algorithm with documentation of a SIC
16 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented advanced care planning
Time Frame: 16 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients with documentation of advanced care planning.
16 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented serious illness conversation (SIC) including follow-up
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients that have an outpatient oncology visit with documentation of a serious illness conversation (SIC) including follow-up
40 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented SIC among those identified as high-risk by the algorithm including follow-up
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients who have an outpatient oncology visit and are identified as high-risk by the machine learning algorithm with documentation of a SIC including follow-up
40 weeks
Change in the proportion of patients with a documented advanced care planning including follow-up
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The change in the proportion of patients with documentation of advanced care planning including follow-up
40 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Oncology Evaluation Center admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of Oncology Evaluation Center admissions
40 weeks
Healthcare utilization and receipt of chemotherapy in the last 30 days of life
Time Frame: 40 weeks
Healthcare utilization in the last 30 days of life in Penn Medicine facilities including acute care utilization as above and receipt of chemotherapy
40 weeks
Number of Emergency department admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of emergency department admissions
40 weeks
Inpatient admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of inpatient hospital admissions
40 weeks
Intensive care unit admissions
Time Frame: 40 weeks
The number of intensive care unit admissions
40 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mitesh S Patel, MD, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

April 19, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 10, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

June 13, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 23, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 833178

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Oncology

Clinical Trials on Nudge

3
Subscribe