PREvention of STroke in Intracerebral haemorrhaGE Survivors With Atrial Fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF)

January 9, 2025 updated by: Imperial College London

PREvention of STroke in Intracerebral haemorrhaGE Survivors With Atrial Fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common form of irregular heart rhythm. In people with AF, blood clots often form in the heart, which can travel to the brain. Blockage of brain arteries by these clots is a major cause of stroke. This type of stroke is called an ischaemic stroke and approximately 15% of all ischaemic strokes are caused by AF.

People with AF are often prescribed a medication called an anticoagulant, which makes it less likely for blood clots to form and thus can prevent ischaemic strokes. However, anticoagulants also increase the risk of bleeding, so they are not suitable for everyone.

Some people who have AF have had a different type of stroke which is caused by bleeding in the brain, an intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH). These people are at increased risk of suffering both an ischaemic stroke (due to AF) and another ICH. It is not known whether it is best for these people to take an anticoagulant medication or not, as previous research studies did not include this group of people.

PREvention of STroke in Intracerebral haemorrhaGE survivors with Atrial Fibrillation (PRESTIGE-AF) is a research study on the best stroke prevention in people with atrial fibrillation (AF) who have recently had a bleeding in their brain, (ICH). This is a trial where half of the participants will take an anticoagulant medication, preventing blood clot formation, and half will not receive an anticoagulant. The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) that will be used in this trial are all licenced for use in the United Kingdom and within the European Union (EU) to prevent strokes in people with AF. However, the current licence does not extend to use with people who have had an ICH because it has not been tested in this group with a randomised controlled trial. DOACs will be tested in ICH survivors with AF because previous research trials have shown that people are up to 50% less likely to have bleeding complications in the brain with DOACs than with Warfarin (another commonly used anticoagulant).

The aim of PRESTIGE-AF is to answer the question of whether people with ICH and AF should take an anticoagulant medication or if it is better for them to avoid it.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Stroke is one of the largest public health challenges worldwide. Its societal impact is expected to further increase in the coming decades due to the aging of population. Importantly, stroke is a heterogeneous disease comprising various subtypes with distinct mechanisms. The variability of individual risks demands that more specifically targeted and better personalised approaches are developed to tailor stroke prevention for particular stroke types and individual patients.

Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) is a particularly severe type of stroke affecting 10-15% of all stroke patients. Importantly, ICH carries even higher mortality and more severe disability than other stroke types. While mechanisms of ICH and ischaemic stroke are distinct, many risk factors are shared and patients are often at increased risk of both ischaemic stroke and ICH.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is also a growing epidemic in aging populations and a major cause of ischaemic stroke due to thrombus formation in the heart migrating to and occluding intracerebral arteries. At least 20% of ICH survivors also suffer from AF and are, thus, at particularly high risk of ischaemic stroke. While ischaemic stroke in AF patients in general can be much more effectively prevented with oral anticoagulation than with antiplatelet agents (APA) concerns about ICH recurrence in ICH survivors are a major barrier for anticoagulation. The best approach to stroke prevention in ICH patients with AF is presently unknown. Current clinical guidelines, which are largely based on retrospective observational studies investigating anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA), either recommend considering anticoagulation only in patients with non-lobar location of ICH or, in the absence of evidence from randomised controlled trials, refrain from making any recommendations at all. Anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) has proven efficacy and safety for stroke prevention in AF. DOACs may be a better alternative to VKA particularly in ICH patients because DOACs were associated with a 50% lower risk of ICH than VKA in previous clinical trials of stroke prevention in AF. However, patients with previous ICH were excluded from these trials.

Although thousands of ICH survivors with AF every year worldwide need effective prevention of another stroke, the best antithrombotic therapy for these patients is currently unknown. PRESTIGE-AF will be the first sufficiently powered randomised controlled trial aiming to resolve the dilemma of stroke prevention in this challenging high-risk patient population. Specifically, it will answer the question whether DOAC with their well-documented lower risk of intracranial haemorrhagic complications, compared to VKA, provide both a more effective and an equally safe option for stroke prevention in patients with ICH and AF compared to no anticoagulant. Findings of the Study are expected to change management guidelines and future prevention research for ICH survivors with AF.

PREvention of STroke in Intracerebral haemorrhaGE survivors (PRESTIGE-AF) will test whether preventive therapy with DOACs (intervention group) reduce the rate of ischaemic stroke (superiority) compared to no anticoagulation (control group) without unacceptably increasing the risk of recurrent ICH (non-inferiority) in patients with AF and a previous ICH within 6 months before enrolment.

The Research Question is:

Does preventive therapy with Direct Oral Anticoagulants (intervention group) reduce the rate of ischaemic stroke (superiority) compared to no anticoagulation (control group) without unacceptably increasing the risk of recurrent Intracerebral haemorrhage (non-inferiority) in patients with atrial fibrillation and a previous intracerebral haemorrhage within 6 months before enrolment.

The Objectives of the study are:

The main objective is to perform a randomised controlled trial to resolve the long-standing management dilemma of antithrombotic stroke prevention in intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) survivors with comorbid atrial fibrillation (AF). Specifically, it will address the question whether direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs, intervention) provide a more effective option for prevention of ischaemic stroke and an equally safe option in terms of recurrence of ICH for antithrombotic stroke prevention in survivors of recent ICH compared to no anticoagulation (i.e. no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet therapy at Principal Investigator´s discretion).

The secondary Study objectives are:

  • To examine the effect of anticoagulation with DOAC versus no anticoagulation on major cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in ICH patient with AF
  • To compare the effect of DOACs versus no anticoagulation on major systemic and intracranial bleeding in this Study population
  • To examine the effect of DOACs versus no anticoagulation on net clinical benefit in ICH patients with AF

The exploratory objectives are:

• To explore the impact of DOAC vs. no anticoagulation on quality of life, cognition and psychological morbidity in patients with ICH and AF over time Study Design: PRESTIGE-AF is a phase 3b investigator-led, multicentre, parallel group, prospective randomised, open, blinded end-point assessment (PROBE) clinical trial comparing DOACs (interventional arm) against no anticoagulation (control arm) in patients with a recent ICH and comorbid AF.

Randomisation will occur in a 1:1 ratio. Participants will be stratified according to two factors: lobar and non-lobar location of ICH and sex. Choice and dose of DOAC treatment as well as the use of concomitant medication during the study treatment will be at the Principal Investigator´s discretion within the spectrum of licensed doses labelled for stroke prevention in AF patients in Europe following the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). The control group will receive no anticoagulant but the use of an antiplatelet agent is at the Principal Investigator´s discretion who will use their clinical judgment to initiate (or not) an antiplatelet drug of their choice.

Baseline assessment will include capturing Participant's demographics, clinical characteristics, vital signs, medical history, and concomitant diseases as well as documentation of AF (previous history or newly detected). Results of routine diagnostic tests before Study enrolment will be also collected using an electronic case report form. The routine brain imaging data performed after the ICH and before Study enrolment will also be collected at baseline.

After randomisation, Participants will be followed-up in person at various time points (1, 6, 12, 24, 36 months) for up to 3 years. At each visit, outcome events and adverse events will be captured.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
319

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Eisenstadt, Austria
        • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Eisenstadt
      • Graz, Austria
        • Medizinische Universität Graz
      • Klagenfurt, Austria
        • Klinikum Klagenfurt am Wörthersee
      • St. Pölten, Austria
        • Universitätsklinikum St. Pölten
  • France
      • Bordeaux, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Bordeaux
      • Caen, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie
  • Germany
      • Aachen, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Aachen
      • Altenburg, Germany
        • Klinikum Altenburger Land
      • Augsburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
      • Bad Neustadt An Der Saale, Germany
        • Rhön-Klinikum Campus Bad Neustadt
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Vivantes Hospital Neukolin
      • Bochum, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum
      • Bottrop, Germany
        • Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bottrop
      • Cologne, Germany
        • University Hospital Cologne
      • Dortmund, Germany
        • Klinikum Dortmund
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Technische Universität Dresden
      • Düsseldorf, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
      • Erlangen, Germany
        • University Hospital Erlangen
      • Essen, Germany
        • Alfried Krupp Von Bohlen und Halbach-Krankenhaus
      • Frankfurt, Germany
        • University Hospital Frankfurt
      • Geissen, Germany
        • Universitiaetsklinikum Giessen und Marburg (UKGM) - Standort Giessen
      • Günzburg, Germany
        • Bezirkskrankenhaus Günzburg
      • Hannover, Germany
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Heidelberg, Germany
        • University Hospital Heidelberg
      • Leipzig, Germany
        • University of Leipzig
      • Luebeck, Germany
        • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck
      • Minden, Germany
        • Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden
      • Stuttgart, Germany
        • Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Tubingen
      • Ulm, Germany
        • Universitatsklinikum Ulm
      • Wuerzburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Wuerzburg
  • Italy
      • Branca, Italy
        • Azienda USL Umbria 1 - Ospedale di Branca-Gubbio
      • Cesena, Italy
        • Ospedale Bufalini di Cesena
      • Città di Castello, Italy
        • Azienda USL Umbria 1 - Ospedale di Città di Castello
      • Foligno, Italy
        • Azienda USL Umbria 2
      • Genova, Italy
        • IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
      • Milan, Italy
        • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
      • Napoli, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera di Rilievo Nazionale (A.O.R.N) A. Cardarelli di Napoli
      • Perugia, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
      • Reggio Emilia, Italy
        • Azienda USL IRCCS Di Reggio Emilia
      • Rome, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera S Camillo Forlanini
      • Siena, Italy
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese
  • Spain
      • Almería, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Torrecárdenas
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Fundacío Institut d'Investigacío Biomèdica de Bellvitge
      • Girona, Spain
        • Hospital Dr Josep Trueta
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
      • Santiago, Spain
        • Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
      • Seville, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
      • Seville, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
      • Valladolid, Spain
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valladolid
  • United Kingdom
      • Ashford, United Kingdom, TN24 0LZ
        • East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust
      • Ashington, United Kingdom, NE63 9JJ
        • Northumbria Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
      • Basildon, United Kingdom, SS16 5NL
        • Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Cambridge, United Kingdom
        • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Chester, United Kingdom
        • Countess of Chester Hospital
      • Hull, United Kingdom, HU3 2JZ
        • Hull and East Yorkshire NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, W6 8RF
        • Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 8AF
        • Kings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
      • Prescot, United Kingdom, L35 5DR
        • St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospital NHS Trust
      • Taunton, United Kingdom, TA1 5DA
        • Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust
      • Wakefield, United Kingdom, WF1 4DG
        • Mid Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
      • Watford, United Kingdom, WD18 0HB
        • West Hertfordshire Hospitals NHS Trust

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Written informed consent obtained from the patient, or for patients who lack the capacity to consent this can be provided by an appropriate representative as defined in protocol
  • Non-traumatic spontaneous ICH during the 12 months before enrolment. Patients become eligible 14 days after the date of their ICH.
  • Documented evidence of AF (paroxysmal, persistent or permanent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Fully dependent (mRS >4)
  • Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, or plan to become pregnant during the Study period
  • Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP see section 12.2 for definition) who are unable or unwilling to take measures for effective contraception (4.9)
  • Enrolment occurring before 14 days after the date of ICH
  • Enrolment occurring longer than 12 months after the date of ICH
  • ICH resulting from trauma or vascular malformation
  • Another indication for long-term anticoagulation

  • Patient has hypertension, which in the opinion of the investigator, is uncontrollable with medication Any contraindication (except intracerebral haemorrhage) to treatment with apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban as per SmPC. Including any of the following:

    • Hypersensitivity to the active principle or any of the excipients
    • Clinically relevant bleeding in progress
    • Liver disease associated with coagulopathy and a clinically relevant bleeding risk
    • Injuries or conditions such as a significant risk of major bleeding
    • Hepatic impairment or liver disease which can have an impact on survival
    • Exclusion of patients with end-stage renal creatinine clearance CrCL, (CrCL <15 ml / min) or in patients undergoing dialysis
    • Concomitant treatment with other anticoagulants
    • Patients with a history of thrombosis and antiphospholipid antibody syndrome Special warnings and precautions for use for apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, rivaroxaban as per SmPC should also be taken into account at randomisation.
  • Absolute need for antiplatelet agent (APA) at enrolment, meaning that a patient randomised to receive DOAC who would require an APA is not eligible (single APA is permitted in control group only, at time of randomisation). Presence of a left atrial appendage occlusion device (LAAO) or plan to implant an LAAO
  • Presence of any medical, psychological, or psychiatric condition which in the opinion of the Principal or Co-Investigator would cause participation in the Study to be unwise
  • Participation in any clinical study with an Investigational Medicinal Product within the past 30 days or 5 half-lives of the study drug (observational studies are permitted)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Direct Oral Anticoagulant

If the patient is randomized in this arm, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) included:

  • Direct thrombin inhibitor: Dabigatran
  • Factor Xa inhibitors: Apixaban or Rivaroxaban or Edoxaban will be prescribed to the patient. Choice and dose of DOAC treatment as well as the use of concomitant medication during the study treatment will be at the Principal Investigator´s discretion within the spectrum of licensed doses labelled for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation patients in Europe following the Summary of Product Characteristics.
Drug: Apixaban Oral Tablet
Factor Xa Inhibitor
Other Names:
  • Eliquis
Drug: Dabigatran
Direct Thrombin Inhibitor
Other Names:
  • Pradaxa
Drug: Edoxaban Tablets
Factor Xa Inhibitor
Other Names:
  • Lixiana
  • Savaysa
Drug: Rivaroxaban
Factor Xa Inhibitor
Other Names:
  • Xarelto
No Intervention: No Anticoagulant
If the patient is randomized in this arm investigators will use their best judgment to decide upon the prescription of an antiplatelet drug of their choice or no such therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to the first incident ischemic stroke event.
Time Frame: 3 years
Statistics: product-limit estimations of the time to event ("survival") functions in both study groups. Measure of association: hazard ratio under the proportional hazard assumption.
3 years
Time to the first recurrent intracerebral haemorrhage event.
Time Frame: 3 years
Statistics: product-limit estimations of the time to event ("survival") functions in both study groups. Measure of association: hazard ratio under the proportional hazard assumption.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of all stroke events
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of all stroke events from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of systemic embolism
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of systemic embolism from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of major adverse cardiac events
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of major adverse cardiac events from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of all-cause mortality from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of cardiovascular mortality
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of cardiovascular mortality from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of major haemorrhage
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of major haemorrhage from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of any intracranial haemorrhage
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of any intracranial haemorrhage from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rates of events (all strokes, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding)
Time Frame: 3 years
Rates of events (all strokes, systemic embolic event, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular mortality and major bleeding) from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of myocardial infarction from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Rate of major bleedings
Time Frame: 3 years
Rate of major bleedings from the index date as number of events per 100 person years under observation in the study
3 years
Quality of life: EQ-5D
Time Frame: enrolment visit, 6 months (min follow-up), 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and End of Treatment Visit (between 6 and 36 Months).

Quality of life: EQ-5D with 3 levels of severity for each of the 5 dimensions:

EQ-5D-3L

Statistics at 12, 24 (if required) and 36 months (if required) in both study groups:

Measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean and SD resp. median and interquartile range) for EQ VAS score (range 0 -100, higher values considered to be a better outcome) and for the EQ-5D-3L index score (range 0 - 1, higher values considered to be a better outcome) health profile: numbers and proportions reporting frequencies of the three levels within the EQ-5D dimensions in both study groups
enrolment visit, 6 months (min follow-up), 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and End of Treatment Visit (between 6 and 36 Months).
Cognitive function: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Time Frame: enrolment visit, 6 months (min follow-up), 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and End of Treatment Visit (between 6 and 36 Months).

Cognitive function: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Total MoCA score: Range: 0 - 30, higher values considered to be a better outcome.

Statistics at 12, 24 (if required) and 36 months (if required) in both study groups:

Measures of central tendency and dispersion (mean and SD resp. median and inter quartile range). Frequencies for the values of the subscores in both study groups
enrolment visit, 6 months (min follow-up), 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and End of Treatment Visit (between 6 and 36 Months).
Psychological morbidity: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: enrolment visit, 6 months (min follow-up), 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and End of Treatment Visit (between 6 and 36 months).

Psychological morbidity: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Statistics at 12, 24 (if required) and 36 months (if required) in both study groups.

HADS anxiety and HADS depression score. For both scales range 0 - 21, smaller values considered to be a better outcome.

Median score and interquartile range for both scales in both study groups. Numbers and percentages of those patients classified as "non-cases", having mild disease, having moderate disease and having severe disease for both scales in both study groups according to the cut-off scores for HADS quantification.
enrolment visit, 6 months (min follow-up), 12 months, 24 months, 36 months, and End of Treatment Visit (between 6 and 36 months).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Imperial College London

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
King's College London
Medical University of Graz
University of Bordeaux
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
University Hospital, Bordeaux
University Hospital Heidelberg
University of Liverpool
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Aalborg University
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
Alfried Krupp Krankenhaus
Julius-Maximilians University
STROKE ALLIANCE FOR EUROPE

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Roland E Veltkamp, FESO, Imperial College London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 3, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 3, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 25, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 9, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17HH4268
  • 2018-002176-41 (EudraCT Number)
  • 754517 (Other Grant/Funding Number: European Union Horizon 2020)
  • 236886 (Other Identifier: IRAS)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

IPD will be available to PRESTIGE-AF collaborators who are listed in the collaborators section. This is necessary to undertake the work as stipulated in the Grant Agreement with the European Union for this Project.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will be available to PRESTIGE-AF collaborators from end of data collection and will be available throughout the archive period (15 years) through the archive system.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

According to Study Protocol

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Apixaban Oral Tablet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings