Whole-body MRI in Pediatric Hodgkin's Lymphoma

November 2, 2020 updated by: R.A.J. Nievelstein, UMC Utrecht

Whole-body MRI for Initial Staging, Early Response Assessment and Restaging After Completion of Therapy in Pediatric Hodgkin's Lymphoma.

Background:

The assessment of extent of disease (staging) and response to therapy (restaging) is performed with computed tomography (CT) scan, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET scan) or integrated FDG-PET/CT. Whole-body MRI with diffusion weighted imaging (WB-MRI with DWIBS) is a radiation-free method which allows imaging of the body with excellent soft tissue contrast in a single examination and could be an attractive alternative to FDG-PET and CT for the staging and restaging of malignant lymphomas in children.

Aim of the study:

The aims of this study are to compare the diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI (including DWIBS) to FDG-PET/CT and/or CT for the initial staging, early response assessment and restaging after completion of therapy in children with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Study design:

Patients eligible for enrollment in this multicenter, prospective, diagnostic cohort study are children aged 8-18 years, with histologically confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma, who are treated according to the EuroNet-PHL-C1 protocol (or trial with similar imaging strategy) in one of the participating centers. Patients will undergo WB-MRI in addition to the protocolar imaging routinely done (FDG-PET(/CT) and CT scan) at 3 time-points: at initial staging, after 2 chemotherapy cycles and at end of treatment. The investigators expect to enrol 75 patients in a 3 year study period. Staging and restaging results of WB-MRI (according to the Ann Arbor and Cheson classification, respectively) will be compared to those of FDG-PET(/CT) and CT. Clinical and radiological follow-up after 6 months will be used to solve any disagreements between FDG-PET, CT and WB-MRI. Additionally, the investigators will collect 3 year follow-up clinical data and data on follow-up imaging from the hospital charts of the patients, to better assess the prognostic value of FDG-PET and WB-MRI.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Background:

The malignant lymphomas, Hodgkin´s lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma (NHL), comprise approximately 10% of childhood cancers. The assessment of extent of disease (staging) and response to therapy (restaging) is performed with computed tomography (CT) scan, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET scan) or integrated FDG-PET/CT. Staging and restaging are important for choice of treatment and for determining prognosis. Unfortunately, FDG-PET and CT are accompanied by a significant amount of radiation exposure which may induce second cancers. New magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques offer an alternative way for staging and follow-up of cancers. Whole-body MRI with diffusion weighted imaging (WB-MRI with DWIBS) is a radiation-free method which allows imaging of the body with excellent soft tissue contrast in a single examination and could be an attractive alternative to FDG-PET and CT for the staging and restaging of malignant lymphomas in children.

Aim of the study:

The aims of this study are to compare the diagnostic performance of whole-body MRI (including DWIBS) to FDG-PET/CT and/or CT for the initial staging, early response assessment and restaging after completion of therapy in children with Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Study design:

Patients eligible for enrollment in this multicenter, prospective, diagnostic cohort study are children aged 8-18 years, with histologically confirmed Hodgkin's lymphoma, who are treated according to the SKION / EuroNet-PHL-C1 protocol (or trial with similar imaging strategy) in one of the participating centers. Patients will undergo WB-MRI in addition to the protocolar imaging routinely done (FDG-PET(/CT) and CT scan) at 3 time-points: at initial staging, after 2 chemotherapy cycles and at end of treatment. We expect to enrol 75 patients in a 3 year study period. Staging and restaging results of WB-MRI (according to the Ann Arbor and Cheson classification, respectively) will be compared to those of FDG-PET(/CT) and CT. All imaging modalities will be assessed by a radiologist and nuclear medicine physician in a blinded fashion, using standardized score forms. Findings of FDG-PET and CT together will serve as the reference standard. Clinical and radiological follow-up after 6 months will be used to solve any disagreements between FDG-PET, CT and WB-MRI. Additionally, at least 3 year follow-up clinical data and data on follow-up imaging will be collected from the hospital charts of the patients, to better assess the prognostic value of FDG-PET and WB-MRI.

Clinical/scientific relevance:

This study aims to assess the accuracy of WB-MRI compared to FDG-PET(/CT) and CT in staging and response assessment of Hodgkin lymphoma. The results of this study can contribute to the development of evidence based 'radiation reduced' imaging protocols in Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
75

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Austria
      • Graz, Austria
        • LKH-Universitätsklinikum Graz
  • Italy
      • Genova, Italy
        • Ospedale Giannina Gaslini
  • Netherlands
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • VU University Medical Center
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Academic Medical Center Amsterdam
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center St. Radboud
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Erasmus Medical Center
      • Utrecht, Netherlands
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • HUMI Vall d'Hebron

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients, aged 8-18 years, with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma, who will undergo PET/CT for staging, early response assessment and restaging at completion of therapy (imaging standards according to the Euronet-PHL-C1 protocol).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • male or female patients
  • age: 8-18 years
  • histologically proven Hodgkin's lymphoma
  • enrolled in the EuroNet-PHL-C1 trial (or trial with comparable imaging strategy)
  • patients scheduled for a FDG-PET/CT and/or CT of the body for initial staging, early response assessment (after two cycles of chemotherapy) or restaging
  • participant's parents (and participants >12 years of age) must willingly give written informed consent prior to each MRI
  • whole-body MRI/DWIBS has to be performed within 15 days before or after FDG-PET/CT or CT and the initial staging MRI should be performed before therapy has been started

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients with a general contraindication for MRI (including cardiovascular pacemakers, claustrophobia)
  • patients who have had a previous malignancy
  • patients who are pregnant or nursing
  • patients in whom therapy has already started after FDG-PET/CT and/or CT and before the initial WB-MRI/DWIBS could be performed
  • apparent signs of resistance during MR examination

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma
Children with newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Staging (Ann Arbor)
Time Frame: Day 1
The primary outcome parameter will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI (including DWIBS) and according to FDG-PET/CT. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Ann Arbor classification system for initial staging.
Day 1
Early treatment response assessment (Cheson criteria)
Time Frame: 2 months
The primary outcome parameter will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI (including DWIBS) and according to FDG-PET/CT. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Cheson criteria for early response assessment.
2 months
Restaging at end of therapy (Cheson criteria)
Time Frame: 6 months
The primary outcome parameter will be the clinical stage according to WB-MRI (including DWIBS) and according to FDG-PET/CT. This clinical stage will be determined according to the Cheson criteria for restaging.
6 months
Follow up for 3 years after end of treatment
Time Frame: 3 years
The percentage of relapse of Hodgkin lymphoma in this study cohort will be assessed by a 3-year follow-up of clinical and imaging data, and the percentage of true- versus false-positives on WB-MRI at end of treatment compared to PET/CT using this follow-up.
3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Image quality
Time Frame: Day 1, 2 months, 6 months
The secondary outcome will be a (subjective) assessment of image quality and presence of artefacts, for both T1-weighted and T2-weighted MR images, MR-DWI as well as PET/CT.
Day 1, 2 months, 6 months
Interobserver variability of WB-MRI for staging, early response assessment and restaging at end of therapy
Time Frame: Day 1, 2 months, 6 months
The interobserver variability of WB-MRI (including DWIBS) for staging, early response assessment and restaging at end of therapy will be determined for two observers.
Day 1, 2 months, 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
UMC Utrecht

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Stichting Kinderen Kankervrij (KiKa)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rutger AJ Nievelstein, MD PhD, UMC Utrecht

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 2, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 3, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 2, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KIKA project number 87

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hodgkin's Lymphoma

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings