Interest of a Systematic One-year Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET-CT (LYMPHOTEP1)

July 8, 2020 updated by: University Hospital, Brest

Interest of a Systematic One-year Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET-CT of Patients in Complete Remission of Malignant Lymphoma

In the study, we aimed to characterize the role of FDG PET/CT surveillance at 12 months of malignant lymphoma in asymptomatic patients after a first complete remission and to define a rational follow-up strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Most aggressive lymphomas are sensitive to first-line immunochemotherapy and are in first Complete Remission (CR) with initial therapy. CR significantly decreases the risk of recurrence and increases survival. However, a cure is not guaranteed and approximately one third of lymphoma patients have a relapse disease.

FDG PET/CT is a valuable noninvasive tool in the evaluation of lymphomas, especially to differentiate viable lymphoma and fibrosis or necrosis in residual mass.

The majority of relapses are diagnosed based on clinical symptoms reported by patients. And the role of FDG PET/CT for routine surveillance of patients after treatment is controversial.

However, many medical centers use routine follow-up FDG PET/CT in addition to physical examination and laboratory analysis to detect subclinical relapse.

Thus, we can imagine a good timing to routine FDG PET/CT when the tumor burden is small in the asymptomatic window.

Survival improvement for relapse detected by routine follow-up imaging is not clearly established compared to diagnosis by clinical symptoms.

Several studies tried to assess the value of follow-up FDG PET/CT but population, type, timing and duration of surveillance imaging was very heterogeneous.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients were examined every 3 to 4 months during the first two years, then every 6 months for three years, including physical examination and blood-test.

One group (group 1) of patients received a systematic routine surveillance FDG PET/CT at 12 months (PET/CT1y) according to hematologist team and the other group (group 2) did not receive routine follow-up FDG PET/CT at 12 months (non PET/CT1y).

None patient was symptomatic the first year. A median follow-up of 24 months at the end of treatment was required.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • first diagnosis of aggressive lymphoma, complete metabolic remission after a first-line of chemotherapy, no relapse in the first year after the end of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • minor patient, pregnant woman, legal protection (legal curatorship / guardianship), absence of consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
role of FDG-PET/CT surveillance at 12months of lymphoma in asymptomatic patient in first complete remission
Time Frame: one day
detection rate of relapse at 1 year and at the end of follow-up
one day
performances FDG-PET/CT 1 year
Time Frame: one day
sensitivity, sensibility, predictive negative value, predictive positive value, accuracy
one day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
overall survival and progression-free survival
Time Frame: one day
as the time from the end of first-line chemotherapy
one day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: olivier delcroix, CHRU Morvan BREST Nuclear Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 9, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2020

Last Verified

July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diagnostic Imaging

Subscribe