St. PETERsburg Pain and Alcohol Intervention With Naltrexone and Gabapentin (UH3)

October 14, 2022 updated by: Boston Medical Center

Pilot Study of Opioid-receptor Antagonists to Reduce Pain and Inflammation Among HIV-Infected Persons With Alcohol Problems

This study is a 3-arm pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of low-dose naltrexone and gabapentin versus placebo among HIV-positive persons with heavy alcohol use and chronic pain to provide estimates of their effects on 1) pain; 2) inflammation; and 3) measures of HIV control. Participants will be followed for 12 weeks. Assessments of study outcomes will be compared at week 8 (end of treatment phase).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pain is a common co-morbidity for HIV-positive patients.Prevalence studies suggest that, on average, half of all HIV-positive persons suffer pain. Chronic pain can lead to heavy alcohol use among HIV-positive persons, which may in turn be a barrier to treatment/control of HIV and contribute to spread of HIV. Thus there is an urgent need to address pain among persons with HIV. It is timely and relevant to conduct research on gabapentin, as it has emerged as one of the most commonly prescribed non-opioid medications for pain despite the fact that gabapentin is only FDA approved for "post-herpetic neuralgia" and the literature to support its use for generalized chronic pain is limited. And yet, gabapentin has demonstrated benefits for treatment of alcohol use disorder, and therefore, like naltrexone, it could have a specific role for treating patients with chronic pain and unhealthy alcohol use. This study is a 3-arm pilot, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of low-dose naltrexone and gabapentin vs. placebo among HIV-positive persons with heavy alcohol use and chronic pain to provide estimates of their effects on 1) pain (both self-reported and experimental/cold pressor test; 2) inflammation (i.e., levels of inflammatory cytokines IL-6, IL-1β, IL-10, and TNF-α); and 3) measures of HIV control (CD4 count and viral load).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
45

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Russian Federation
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
        • First St. Petersburg Pavlov State Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years or older
  • HIV-positive
  • Chronic pain (present ≥3 mo) of moderate to severe intensity
  • Heavy drinking past year (Based on NIAAA criteria: > 14 standard drinks per week/ > 4 drinks in a day for men; > 7 drinks in the past week/ > 3 drinks in a day for women)
  • If female, negative pregnancy test and willing to use adequate birth control
  • Provision of contact information for 2 contacts to assist with follow-up
  • Stable address within 100 kilometers of St. Petersburg
  • Possession of a telephone (home or cell)
  • Able and willing to comply with all study protocols and procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not fluent in Russian
  • Cognitive impairment resulting in inability to provide informed consent based on research assessor (RA) assessment
  • Known active TB or current febrile illness
  • Breastfeeding
  • Known uncontrolled psychiatric illness (such as active psychosis)
  • Current suicidal ideation
  • History of hypersensitivity to naltrexone, gabapentin, or naloxone
  • Current use (past week) of illicit or prescribed opiates as documented by either self-report or positive urine drug test
  • Unwilling to abstain from opiates during the treatment period
  • Current use of neuroleptics
  • History of seizure disorder
  • Known liver failure
  • AST/ALT levels >5x normal
  • CrCl< 60mL/min
  • History of Reynaud's disease
  • Planned surgeries in the next 3 months
  • Enrolled in another HIV and/or substance use medication intervention study
  • Taking naltrexone in the past 30 days
  • Taking gabapentin in the past 30 days
  • Taking pregabalin in the past 30 days
  • Diagnosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Low-dose naltrexone
Participants randomized to this group will receive low dose naltrexone (4.5 mg) for 8 weeks.
Drug: Low-dose naltrexone
4.5 mg of low dose naltrexone taken once daily for 8 weeks. In week 1, participants will take 4.5mg of naltrexone once daily. In week 2, participants will take 4.5mg of naltrexone once daily, and a placebo capsule twice daily. In weeks 3 through 7, participants will take 1 placebo capsule with 4.5 mg mg of naltrexone once daily, and 2 placebo capsules twice daily. In week 8, in days 1-4 participants will take 4.5 mg of naltrexone with a placebo capsule once daily and 2 placebo capsules twice daily; in days 5-7, participants will take 4.5 mg of naltrexone once daily, and a placebo capsule twice daily.
Active Comparator: Gabapentin
Participants randomized to the gabapentin arm begin on a dose of 300 mg daily (300 mg qd). In week 2, participants will take 300 mg of gabapentin three times daily. In week 3 the dose will be titrated up to 1800 mg daily (300 mg+300 mg tid) will remain on the dose until week 8, when they will be tapered back down to 900 mg daily (300 mg tid). In week 8, in days 1-4 participants will take 1800 mg daily (300 mg+300 mg tid); in days 5-7, participants will take 900 mg daily (300 mg of gabapentin three times daily).
Drug: Gabapentin
Dose will begin at 300 mg daily (300 mg qd), in week 2 the dose will be titrated up to 900 mg daily (300 mg tid). In week 3, the dose will be titrated to 1800 mg daily ( 2 capsules of 300 mg tid) and participants will remain on that dose until week 8. In week 8, in days 1-4 participants will take 1800 mg daily (300 mg+300 mg tid); in days 5-7, participants will take 900 mg daily (300 mg of gabapentin three times daily).
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive a placebo to be taken three times daily for 8 weeks.
Drug: Placebo
In week 1, participants will take 1 placebo capsule once daily. In week 2, participants will take 1 placebo capsule three times per day. In weeks 3 through 7, 2 placebo capsules three times per day. In week 8, in days 1-4 participants will take 2 placebo capsules three times per day; in days 5-7, participants will take 1 placebo capsule three times per day. The placebo medications will be composed of lactose and will not contain active ingredients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Past Week Pain Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in past week pain severity (score 0 [no pain] -10 [high pain]) from baseline to week 8. Pain severity will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory, which allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function
Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in Past Week Pain Interference
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in past week pain interference (score 0 [no pain]-10 [high pain]) from baseline to week 8. Pain interference will be measured using the Brief Pain Inventory, which allows patients to rate the severity of their pain and the degree to which their pain interferes with common dimensions of feeling and function
Baseline, 8-weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cold Pain Tolerance
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Mean change in the number of seconds a participant can keep their hand submerged in a container of iced water. Participants were instructed to keep their hand in as long as they could, up to 3 minutes.
Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in Percentage of Past Month Heavy Drinking Days
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Mean percentage of change in self-reported heavy drinking in the past 30 days of alcohol consumption obtained via the Timeline Followback (TLFB) method. The NIAAA definition of heavy drinking is used (> 4 drinks in a day for men; > 3 drinks in a day for women). Participants were asked about their alcohol consumption on each day in the previous 30 days.
Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in CD4 Count
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Defined as mean change in CD4 values from lab assay
Baseline, 8-weeks
Number of Participants With a Change in HIV Viral Load Suppression Status
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Defined as number of participants who change from suppressed to unsuppressed or unsuppressed to suppressed from lab tests
Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in Biomarker IL-6
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Mean change in IL-6 values measured on blood samples collected using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (R&D Systems).
Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in Biomarker IL-10
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks
Mean change in IL-10 values measured on blood samples collected using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (R&D Systems).
Baseline, 8 weeks
Change in TNF-alpha
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Mean change in TNF-alpha values measured on blood samples collected using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (R&D Systems).
Baseline, 8-weeks
Change in IL-1beta
Time Frame: Baseline, 8-weeks
Mean change in IL-1beta values measured on blood samples collected using commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (R&D Systems).
Baseline, 8-weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Boston Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jeffrey H. Samet, MD, MA, MPH, Boston University/Boston Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 25, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 16, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 8, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 14, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-39162
  • UH3AA026193 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

All data from the study will be placed into the URBAN ARCH repository.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings