Efficacy Of Quadratus Lumborum II Block For Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

December 8, 2022 updated by: Ali Nima Shariat, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Quadratus Lumborum II Block vs Conventional Therapy Alone For Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

The QL 2 block is a novel fascial plane block recently described by Blanco and colleagues in which local anesthetic is deposited adjacent to the antero-lateral aspect of the quadratus lumborum muscle. This results in posterior spread of local anesthetic through the middle layer of the thoraco-lumbar fascia, which theoretically communicates with the paravertebral space resulting in potentially longer-lasting and denser analgesia than wound infiltration. The QL 2 block derives from the TAP block, which is also a fascial plane block that is commonly used to treat pain following surgery involving the anterior abdominal wall. However, the QL block's more posterior location has recently been shown to provide a longer lasting and more profound analgesic effect than the TAP block, possibly by communicating with the paravertebral space. Although the TAP has been shown to be effective in a variety of surgical procedures involving an anterior abdominal wall incision including laparoscopic bariatric surgery the QL 2 block has until now, not been studied in the context of bariatric surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The QL 2 block is a novel fascial plane block recently described by Blanco and colleagues in which local anesthetic is deposited adjacent to the antero-lateral aspect of the quadratus lumborum muscle. This results in posterior spread of local anesthetic through the middle layer of the thoraco-lumbar fascia, which theoretically communicates with the paravertebral space resulting in potentially longer-lasting and denser analgesia than wound infiltration. Like the more commonly used transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block, the QL 2 block targets the anterior rami of T7-T12, ilioinguinal, iliohypogastric, and the lateral cutaneous branches of L1-L3. The QL 2 block derives from the TAP block, which is also a fascial plane block that is commonly used to treat pain following surgery involving the anterior abdominal wall. However, the QL block's more posterior location has recently been shown to provide a longer lasting and more profound analgesic effect than the TAP block, possibly by communicating with the paravertebral space. Although the TAP has been shown to be effective in a variety of surgical procedures involving an anterior abdominal wall incision including laparoscopic bariatric surgery the QL 2 block has until now, not been studied in the context of bariatric surgery. Conventional therapy has consisted of surgical infiltration of the incision ports with bupivacaine 0.25%. The study team proposes a study to compare the analgesic effects of the QL 2 block with conventional therapy, consisting of surgical wound infiltration, for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic gastric sleeve gastrectomy.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10025
        • Mount Sinai St. Lukes Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gastric sleeve gastrectomy
  • 18-65 years of age
  • BMI> 35 kg/m2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to administration of local anesthesia (e.g. local anesthetic allergy)
  • Contraindication/allergy to acetaminophen or ketorolac
  • History of substance abuse or chronic opioid use
  • Coagulopathy
  • Patients receiving systemic anticoagulation
  • Local infection
  • ASA 4

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Quadratus Lumborum II Group
The QL 2 group will receive 15 mL bupivacaine 0.25% on both sides for a total of 30 mL once the surgery is done but prior to extubation under ultrasound guidance.
Drug: Bupivacaine
Bupivacaine Hcl 0.25% Inj
Active Comparator: Conventional Therapy
Conventional therapy consists of the injection of 30 mL of bupivacaine 0.25% directly into the incision sites by the surgeon at the end of the procedure.
Drug: Bupivacaine
Bupivacaine Hcl 0.25% Inj

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Amount of Opioid Consumption During and After Procedure
Time Frame: Intraop, Postop 1hr, Postop 2hr, POD0, POD1, and POD2
The amount of opioid consumption (in mg IV morphine equivalents) during and after procedure (100mcg fentanyl= 10mg morphine) (1.5mg dilaudid=10mg morphine)
Intraop, Postop 1hr, Postop 2hr, POD0, POD1, and POD2

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS Pain Scores
Time Frame: Intraop, Postop 1hr, Postop 2hr, POD0, POD1, and POD2
Visual analogue scale - total score from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating more pain
Intraop, Postop 1hr, Postop 2hr, POD0, POD1, and POD2
Respiratory Rate
Time Frame: 1 hour post op
Respiratory rate in breaths per minute
1 hour post op
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 1 hour after surgery
Heart rate in beats per minute
1 hour after surgery
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: 1 hour after surgery
Both systolic and diastolic pressures
1 hour after surgery
Time to First Dose of Analgesic Request
Time Frame: up to 60 minutes
Time until first analgesic request in minutes
up to 60 minutes
PACU Length of Stay
Time Frame: average 2 hours
Post anesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay in hours
average 2 hours
Number of Participants With Pain
Time Frame: Up to 48 hours
Number of participants with somatic or visceral pain.
Up to 48 hours
Number of Participants With Nausea
Time Frame: the first 48 hours after the procedure
Number of participants with nausea
the first 48 hours after the procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ali N Shariat, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 31, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GCO 18-1004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings