Comparison of Effectiveness Between the Combination of Lidocaine Sprayed at Laryngeal Inlet and on the Cuff of Endotracheal Tube Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Reducing Cough During Extubation
Comparison of Effectiveness Between the Combination of Lidocaine Sprayed at Laryngeal Inlet and on the Cuff of Endotracheal Tube Versus Intravenous Lidocaine for Reducing Cough During Extubation: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Khon Kaen, Thailand, 40002
- Khon Kaen University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients who underwent elective surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classifications of I and III
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients having body mass index more than 35 kg/m2, high risk of aspiration, chronic smokers more than ten pack-years, chronic cough or recent upper respiratory infection, suspected difficult airway, retained ETT prior surgery, surgery at oral cavity, neck and thoracic region, operative time more than 120 minutes or less than 30 minutes, and history of lidocaine allergy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: the study group (Group A)
Patients received four puffs of 10% lidocaine sprayed at the cuff of ETT and four puffs at laryngeal inlet
|
four puffs of 10% lidocaine sprayed at the cuff of ETT and four puffs at laryngeal inlet
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Comparator group (Group B)
Patients received 15 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine intravenous injection prior to extubation
|
15 mg/kg of 2% lidocaine intravenous injection prior to extubation
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in incidence of coughing
Time Frame: the incidence was recorded during extubation and immediatly extubation
|
Coughing event was recorded by blinded anesthesiologist
|
the incidence was recorded during extubation and immediatly extubation
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Severity of coughing
Time Frame: the severity was recorded during extubation and immediatly extubation
|
the severity of cough was recorded by blinded anesthesiologist.
Coughing level severity (16) was evaluated as 0 = no cough; 1 = slight cough, cough without obvious contraction of abdomen; 2 = moderate cough, strong and sudden contraction of the abdomen lasting less than 5 seconds; 3 = severe cough, strong and sudden contraction of the abdomen sustained more than 5 seconds
|
the severity was recorded during extubation and immediatly extubation
|
|
Incidence of postoperative sore throat
Time Frame: the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation
|
Incidence of postoperative sore throat was recorded by two blinded anesthetist nurses .
The numeric rating scale (0 = no, 10 = extreme) was used for evaluation of sore throat.
If the numeric rating scale was more than 3, it was considered as a significant adverse event.
|
the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation
|
|
Incidence of dysphonia
Time Frame: the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation
|
Incidence of dysphonia was recorded by two blinded anesthetist nurses .
|
the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation
|
|
Incidence of dysphagia
Time Frame: the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation
|
Incidence of dysphagia was recorded by two blinded anesthetist nurses .
|
the incidence was recorded within 24 hr after extubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: PORNTHEP KASEMSIRI, Khon Kaen University
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Respiratory Tract Diseases
- Respiration Disorders
- Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory
- Cough
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anesthetics, Local
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Lidocaine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HE611394
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.