Parent-Led Cognitive-Behavioral Teletherapy for Anxiety in Youth With ASD

December 8, 2024 updated by: Eric A Storch, Baylor College of Medicine
This study implements an anxiety-focused, parent-led, therapist-assisted cognitive behavioral teletherapy for parents of youth with ASD and anxiety.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Anxiety disorders affect 50-80% of children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and are associated with significant life impairment and worsening trajectory without treatment. The most effective psychotherapy for anxiety in youth with and without ASD is cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), but many families are not able to access CBT due to the cost, practicalities of attending treatment sessions, and limited availability of trained therapists. Alternative models of service delivery are greatly needed, with particular promise of parent-led therapist-assisted (PLTA) models and telehealth delivery formats. Parents may benefit from additional information regarding how to optimize the delivery of CBT for youths with ASD given the potential impact of ASD symptomology on core CBT skills. Thus, this project aims to improve access to anxiety-focused Parent-Led Therapist-Assisted CBT for parents of youth with ASD. Parent-led low-intensity treatment models can improve accessibility, efficiency, and mental health treatment cost. Lower intensity treatment models provide a treatment option that is less costly and burdensome for parents; it is understood that some individuals will respond to the first step and others will require additional treatment to achieve anxiety reduction. However, understanding how many families, and which families, can benefit from a lower intensity model has dramatic benefits for improving access, allocating more intensive services for those most in need, and reducing barriers (e.g., distance). Thus, this study will examine the effectiveness of two anxiety-focused PTLA CBT telehealth models: 1) low-intensity therapist assistance (LTA) and 2) standard therapist assistance (STA). Overall, this study will provide important information regarding the potential benefits of two different approaches to parent-led interventions for youth with ASD and anxiety when delivered via telehealth.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
87

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child is between the ages 7-13 years at consent/assent.
  • The child meets criteria for ASD.
  • The child meets criteria for clinically significant anxiety and/or OCD symptoms.
  • Anxiety and/or OCD is the primary presenting problem.
  • One parent/guardian is able and willing to participate.
  • The child has a Full Scale and Verbal Comprehension Intelligence Quotient >70.
  • The child is able to communicate verbally.
  • Participants must reside in Texas and parents must be in the state of Texas when taking calls.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The child has a diagnosis of lifetime DSM-5 bipolar disorder, psychotic disorder, and/or intellectual disability.
  • The child has severe current suicidal/homicidal ideation and/or self-injury requiring medical intervention.
  • The child is receiving concurrent psychotherapy for anxiety.
  • Initiation of a psychotropic medication less than 4 weeks prior to study enrollment or a stimulant/psychoactive medication less than 2 weeks prior to study enrollment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Low-Intensity Therapist Assistance (LTA)
Parents will receive four 30-minute supportive video calls with a therapist over the 12 weeks of treatment.
Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Teletherapy LTA
Participating families will receive a copy of the book 'Helping Your Anxious Child, 2nd Edition', as well as the companion parent and child workbooks, to use at home and in session with the therapist. During each of the four videoconferencing sessions, therapists will serve to provide encouragement and support as the parent works through the program independently.
Active Comparator: Standard Therapist Assistance (STA)
Parents will receive ten 60-minute supportive video calls with a therapist over the 12 weeks of treatment.
Behavioral: Cognitive Behavioral Teletherapy STA
Participating families will also receive a copy of the book 'Helping Your Anxious Child, 2nd Edition', as well as the companion parent and child workbooks, to use at home and in session with the therapist. During each of the ten videoconferencing sessions, therapists will guide the parent through the implementation of the program, including explaining materials, assisting to develop planned therapy activities with the child, and problem-solving as needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-item Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), post-treatment (on average 12 weeks), 3 month follow up; Post-treatment scores reported.
Clinician rated child anxiety severity throughout the past week. Each item is scored on a 0 to 5 scale (higher scores correspond to greater severity), yielding a total between 0 and 30.
Baseline (before treatment), post-treatment (on average 12 weeks), 3 month follow up; Post-treatment scores reported.
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement
Time Frame: Each treatment session, post-treatment (on average 12 weeks), 3 month follow up; Post-treatment scores reported.
Clinician rated child psychopathology improvement since initial rating. A single item is scored 0-6 (0 = very much worse; 6= very much improved).
Each treatment session, post-treatment (on average 12 weeks), 3 month follow up; Post-treatment scores reported.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Global Impression-Severity
Time Frame: Baseline (before treatment), Each treatment session, post-treatment (on average 12 weeks), 3 month follow up; Post-treatment scores reported.
Clinician rated child psychopathology severity rating. A single item is scored 0-6 (0= no illness; 6= extremely severe symptoms).
Baseline (before treatment), Each treatment session, post-treatment (on average 12 weeks), 3 month follow up; Post-treatment scores reported.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Baylor College of Medicine

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 30, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 31, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 30, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H45203

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings