Pilot Study Comparing Two Versions of Group Cognitive-behavioral Indicated Prevention Programs
Depression Prevention Programs: A Pilot Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Oregon
-
Eugene, Oregon, United States, 97401
- Oregon Research Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- current student at the University of Oregon
- subthreshold symptoms of depression, as indicated by a CES-D depression screener score of 20 or greater
Exclusion Criteria:
- current diagnosis of major depression
- acute suicidal ideation requiring immediate mental health treatment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Change Ahead
Each of the 6 weekly 1-hour sessions begins with a voluntary commitment to actively participate and to try something new in the upcoming week; includes a section devoted to selecting and publicly committing to one change focused on reducing negative/increasing positive cognitions and one change focused on increasing pleasant activities; and ends with home practice assignments.
Additional exercises designed to increase dissonance induction include (a) group discussions for changing conditions, (b) roleplays to generate quick comebacks to written negative thoughts provided by other group members, (c) in-session writing exercises on the benefits of doing fun activities, (d) discussion of methods for creating internal and external accountability for positive change, (e) home practice assignment of engaging in actions to help someone else' mood, (f) writing a letter to my future self about positive intentions, and (g) providing positive feedback to other group members at the last session.
|
College students with depressive symptoms will be randomized to one of three conditions: 1) a cognitive behavioral prevention intervention, 2) a cognitive behavioral prevention intervention with counter-attitudinal elements or 3) an educational brochure control.
We will test if the additional of counter attitudinal elements produces intervention effects when delivered to participants with sub threshold depressive symptoms.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Blues Program
The 6 weekly 1-hour sessions begin with a review of concepts and (after Session 1) review of past home practice assignments; all sessions conclude with home practice assignments.
Each session has a portion devoted to thought identification/recording and cognitive restructuring and a portion devoted to increased involvement in pleasant activities.
We use motivational enhancement exercises to maximize willingness to use the new skills, behavioral techniques to reinforce use of the new skills, and group activities to foster feelings of group cohesion.
|
College students with depressive symptoms will be randomized to one of three conditions: 1) a cognitive behavioral prevention intervention, 2) a cognitive behavioral prevention intervention with counter-attitudinal elements or 3) an educational brochure control.
We will test if the additional of counter attitudinal elements produces intervention effects when delivered to participants with sub threshold depressive symptoms.
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Brochure control
NIMH brochure that describes major depression and recommends treatment for depressed youth ("Let's Talk About Depression" NIH Pub.
01-4162), as well as information about local treatment options.
|
College students with depressive symptoms will be randomized to one of three conditions: 1) a cognitive behavioral prevention intervention, 2) a cognitive behavioral prevention intervention with counter-attitudinal elements or 3) an educational brochure control.
We will test if the additional of counter attitudinal elements produces intervention effects when delivered to participants with sub threshold depressive symptoms.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline Depressive Disorder Diagnostic using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia at 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate change (if any) by using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia at the 6 week, 3 month and 6 month marks.
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Difference in attendance in Change Ahead vs Blues Program groups using group leader notes
Time Frame: Measured at each group therapy session (6 weeks in total).
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in attendance in Change Ahead vs Blues Program group therapies by using group leader notes.
|
Measured at each group therapy session (6 weeks in total).
|
|
Difference in future onset of Major Depressive Disorder using the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in the future onset of Major Depressive Disorder at 3 months and 6 months.
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Activity level
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, weeks 2,4 and 6.
|
Evaluate the participants activity levels using Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs).
|
Measured at baseline, weeks 2,4 and 6.
|
|
Emotions
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, weeks 2,4 and 6.
|
Evaluate the participants emotions using Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs).
|
Measured at baseline, weeks 2,4 and 6.
|
|
Positive and negative thoughts
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, weeks 2,4 and 6.
|
Evaluate the participants positive and negative thoughts using Ecological Momentary Assessments (EMAs).
|
Measured at baseline, weeks 2,4 and 6.
|
|
Assessments using writing samples
Time Frame: Measured at baseline and 6 weeks
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in social and academic problem solving skills and thoughts of the future.
|
Measured at baseline and 6 weeks
|
|
Depression and anxiety symptoms using the PHQ-9
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Depression and anxiety symptoms using the GAD-7
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported depression and anxiety symptoms
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Social adjustment in school, work, peer, spare time, and family domains
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported social adjustment using 17 items adapted from Social Adjustment Scale-Self Report for Youth (Weissman, Orvaschel, & Padian, 1980)
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Negative life events
Time Frame: Measured at baseline
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported negative life events
|
Measured at baseline
|
|
Health care utilization
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported utilization of health care services for physical health problems/injuries, mental health problems, and other personal problems.
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Negative automatic thoughts
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported negative automatic cognition using 12 items from the Automatic Thoughts Questionnaire (ATQ; Hollon & Kendall, 1980)
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Negative attributional style
Time Frame: Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (if any) in self-reported negative attributional style
|
Measured at baseline, 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Substance use
Time Frame: Measured at baseline (in intake screener), 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Evaluate difference (in any) in self-reported substance use using 10 items from Stice, Barrera and Chassin (1998).
Participants report the frequency of intake of beer/wine/wine coolers and hard liquor, frequency of heavy drinking (5 or more drinks in a row), frequency of times drunk, and frequency of marijuana, stimulants, downers, inhalants, and hallucinogen use.
|
Measured at baseline (in intake screener), 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Change Ahead
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.