Molecular Variants Associated With Schizophrenia: Differential Analysis of Monozygotic Twins With Variable Phenotypic 22q11 (CSRK05)

February 8, 2021 updated by: Hôpital le Vinatier

Translational 22q11.2:"Molecular Variants Associated With Schizophrenia: Differential Analysis of Monozygotic Twins With Variable Phenotypic 22q11.2 Microdeletional Syndrom"

The 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) is a rare disease with a psychiatric phenotype. Indeed, the diagnosis of schizophrenia is made in 5 to 10% of adolescents and 25 to 40% of adults carrying the 22q11DS. Thus, although this pathology has been able to provide a genetically homogeneous model for the study psychosis etiology, it is not currently possible to establish a link between genomic rearrangement and psychotic symptoms. However, this robust model of genetic vulnerability could provide us a lot of translational informations about schizophrenia genetics. To go furthermore, twin studies have provided us precious data for the study of hereditary diseases. Combining this two approaches, the translational 22q11.2 project proposes a molecular study of two monozygotic 22q11.2DS twins discordant for the psychiatric phenotype -one carrying schizophrenia and the other having no psychiatric symptoms-.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The main objective of the study is to propose a whole exome sequencing (WES), pan-genomic in whole genome sequencing (WGS), transcriptomic, epigenomic and intestinal microbiome approaches in order to determine specific molecular basis of psychotic symptoms in 22q11.2DS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
2

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
    • Rhone Alpes
      • Lyon, Rhone Alpes, France, 69678
        • Hopital Vinatier

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Sisterhood of monozygotic twins diagnosed with de novo 22q11.2DS is confirmed by CGH array and discordant for the psychiatric phenotype

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Refusal to use data for research purposes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
OTHER: Groupe "Twin 1"
Twin 1 with psychotic symptoms (PANSS +) Molecular analyses 1
Genetic: Molecular analyses
Comparaison of the molecular profil between two monozygotic twins carrying a deletion 22q11.2
OTHER: Groupe "Twin 2"
Twin 2 without psychotic symptoms (PANSS +) Molecular analyses 2
Genetic: Molecular analyses
Comparaison of the molecular profil between two monozygotic twins carrying a deletion 22q11.2

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Whole exome sequencing
Time Frame: 6 months
Searching for mosaic genetic variations that may have occurred secondarily to conception
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Transcriptome
Time Frame: 6 months
two methods of mRNA extraction will be used: from the establishment of lymphoblastoid lines and from whole blood collected on paxgene® tube. After depletion of ribosomal RNA, the RNAs will be converted into complementary DNAs and libraries will be made using 100 to 200ng of total RNA. Libraries will be sequenced in a paired-end to generate 80 million reads per sample. The data will be analyzed with the HTSeq suite to count the number of reads associated with each gene annotated in the latest version of the genome. The DESeq bioconductor suite will be used to normalize the expression. A study to identify differentially expressed genes will be performed with this tool and GFold. Genes showing statistically significant differential expression will be validated by RT-qPCR
6 months
Methylome
Time Frame: 6 months
This analysis will be carried out in collaboration with " L'hôpital de Sainte Anne2 (Inserm UMR_S894 "Physiology of psychiatric diseases" - Professor Marie-Odile KREBS). The DNA will be extracted from whole blood collected on paxgene® tube. The methylation of the entire genome of twin siblings will be studied by the Infinium MethylationEPIC BeadChip chip (Illumina) that covers 850,000 CpG and the set of genes after bisulfite DNA processing. The statistical analysis of the methylation differences will be carried out with the R software (minfi and ChAMP packages) in order to highlight the DMP (Differentially Methylated Probes) as well as the DMR (Differentially Methylated Regions, probes contigues).
6 months
Microbiotic DNA
Time Frame: 6 months
A quantitative metagenomic analysis will be carried out on the basis of a sequencing of the genetic material extracted from the intestinal microbiome in the stools of the two twins
6 months
Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS)
Time Frame: 6 months
Scale of evaluation of positive and negative syndromes of schizophrenic symptomatology.The patient is rated from 1 to 7 on 30 different symptoms based on the interview as well as reports of family members or primary care hospital workers.As 1 rather than 0 is given as the lowest score for each item, a patient can not score lower than 30 for the total PANSS score. Scores are often given separately for the positive items, negative items, and general psychopathology.
6 months
Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
Time Frame: 6 months
The modalities for answering all the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)questions are "YES" or "NO". If the answers to these filter questions are positive, the following ones are asked allowing to validate or invalidate the diagnosis concerned.
6 months
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is an instrument for detecting anxiety and depressive disorders. It has 14 listed items from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), allowing thus obtaining two scores (maximum score of each score = 21).
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Hôpital le Vinatier

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: DEMILY CAROLINE, MD PH.D, Centre Hospitalier le Vinatier & CNRS UMR 5229 (BRON, France)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 27, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 30, 2020

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 24, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 24, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 8, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2019-A00852-55

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings