Facial Affect Sensitivity Training for Young Children With Callous-unemotional Traits

June 15, 2026 updated by: Bradley A. White, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

Facial Affect Sensitivity Training for Young Children With CU Traits

The goal of this study is to test a novel intervention for children ages 6-11 with elevated callous-unemotional (CU) traits. Conduct problems are among the most prevalent and costly mental health conditions of childhood, and a common antecedent to adult psychiatric disorders. An established risk factor for early, persistent, and severe youth misconduct is the presence of CU traits. CU traits (e.g., lack of empathy or guilt, shallow affect) are analogous to the core affective features of adult psychopathy, interfere with child socialization, and predict poorer outcomes, even with well-established treatments for disruptive behavior disorders. Thus, novel intervention approaches are needed to target CU traits. Youth with elevated CU traits show deficits in facial emotion recognition (FER) for distress-related expressions, particularly fear or sadness. The central hypothesis is that impaired sensitivity for emotional distress cues (fear and/or sadness) is mechanistically linked to CU traits in children, and that, by targeting affect sensitivity directly, intervention can exert downstream effects on CU traits. A gap in the field regards how to remediate these neurocognitive deficits. This project will directly target affect sensitivity in high-CU youth. The investigators propose an experimental therapeutics approach to develop a novel neurocognitive intervention for CU traits, in which a clearly identified target, facial affect sensitivity (FAS), will be engaged and assessed via primary (distress FER accuracy and/or heightened eye gaze) and secondary (electroencephalograph event-related potential) neurocognitive and behavioral processes. If investigators can demonstrate engagement of the target (FAS) in the initial R61 phase, then in the R33 phase, this finding will be replicated with a new, larger sample, and feasibility and preliminary efficacy of FAST on CU traits will be examined. The long-term goal is to examine FAST impact on behavioral outcomes and to potentially apply this targeted intervention to the wider range of problems associated with CU traits.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This project will directly target affect sensitivity in high-CU youth. Per the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Strategic Plan (Objective 3.1), the investigators propose an experimental therapeutics approach to develop a novel neurocognitive intervention for CU traits, in which a clearly identified target, facial affect sensitivity (FAS), will be engaged and assessed via primary [distress facial emotion recognition (FER) accuracy, heightened eye gaze] and secondary (EEG event-related potential) neurocognitive and behavioral processes. The long-term goal is to apply this targeted intervention to the wider range of problems associated with CU traits. The R61 phase Specific Aims are as follows: Investigators will first demonstrate, in a preliminary randomized controlled trial (RCT; N=84 children), that a new neurocognitive intervention (Facial Affect Sensitivity Training: FAST) can improve FAS [target engagement] in children with elevated CU traits. FAS will be measured primarily by FER accuracy for distress expressions and/or heightened attention to the eye region (eye gaze), and secondarily by neural activity [specifically, N170 and P200 event-related potential (ERP) components]. Objective 1: Establish that distress FER accuracy and/or eye gaze can be altered in a reliable manner among young children with elevated CU traits. Objective 2: Determine whether FAST improves secondary neural indices of FAS (brain activity during processing of emotional faces). Objective 3: Refine FAST for subsequent evaluation by determining optimal dose parameters with regard to number of sessions for FER and/or eye gaze improvement via a nonlinear mixed model for small samples (e.g., timing of local bump or decay, amount of change, when maximal change occurs), and participant satisfaction with session frequency, length, and number. Objective 4: Deliver a computerized training program (FAST) capable of providing real-time automated feedback and reinforcement of accurate FER performance. Milestones (Go/No-Go Criteria): (1) FAST will engage the target (FAS), indexed by enhancing distress FER accuracy and/or eye gaze in high-CU youth. The investigators will examine individual growth rates and test slope differences between conditions (FAST v control). Target engagement will be defined as medium effect size (defined as Cohen's d value = .50) in the comparison of FAST vs. no-treatment control on the primary target (distress FER and/or eye gaze). The R33 phase Specific Aims are as follows: The investigators aim to replicate target engagement with a new, large high-CU sample and evaluate feasibility and preliminary efficacy of FAST, in the context of an RCT (N = 84) in which FAST is compared to an active control condition (ACC; implicit eye gaze training). In addition, this phase will validate the functional role of FAS by examining downstream change in CU as a result of FAST. FAST will produce reliable increases in FER accuracy for distress cues in others. Furthermore, FAST completers will show greater improvement in CU/empathic behaviors than ACC completers. Objective 5: Replicate target engagement of FAS. Objective 6: Determine if improved FAS leads to reduction in CU traits. The investigators will also consider in a preliminary fashion whether CU trait reductions are clinically significant (more than .5 pre-test standard deviation on 2 target CU indices or more than 1.0 standard deviation on one CU measure). If the FAST intervention improves FER and reduces CU traits, such training in early childhood could help interrupt the developmental cascade toward antisocial outcomes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
161

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Bradley A White, PhD
  • Phone Number: (205) 348-0251
  • Email: whiteba@ua.edu

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Susan W White, PhD
  • Phone Number: (205) 348-1967
  • Email: swwhite1@ua.edu

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States, 35487
        • Center for Youth Development and Intervention (CYDI)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 11 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A standard score less than or equal to 9 on the NEPSY (A Developmental NEuroPSYchological Assessment) Affect Recognition (AR) test, or less than or equal to 70% accuracy for distress-related emotions on a Dynamic FER measure.
  • Composite intelligence quotient (IQ) score of at least 72 on the Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence, Second Edition.
  • Any psychotropic medications must be on stable dosing schedule for 2 weeks prior to entry.
  • Presence of elevated CU traits, defined as a total score of at least 2 on the 4 CU items of the Antisocial Process Screening Device (APSD), Parent Version, with caregiver-endorsed distress or impairment required for scores of exactly 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

Bipolar disorder. Current risk for suicide or harm to others. Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis. Currently participating in therapy for CU traits or facial emotion recognition deficits.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm 1: R61 FAST
Individuals in this Arm will receive the FAST intervention, as described in the Intervention section of the Clinical Trials form below, with a focus on demonstrating target (facial affect sensitivity) engagement.
Behavioral: Facial Affect Sensitivity Training (FAST)
The FAST intervention program represents a novel computerized intervention for high-risk youth that strategically targets implicated facial affect sensitivity deficits directly via a computerized real-time automated feedback and incentive system to remediate callous-unemotional tendencies associated with behavioral dysfunction.
No Intervention: Arm 2: R61 No-Treatment Control
Individuals in this Arm will not receive any intervention.
Experimental: Arm 3: R33 FAST
Individuals randomized this Arm of the R33 phase will receive the FAST intervention, with the aim of replicating FAST target engagement (as demonstrated in the R61 phase) with a new high-CU sample, and to evaluate the FAST intervention in comparison to an active control condition (Arm 4, implicit eye gaze training).
Behavioral: Facial Affect Sensitivity Training (FAST)
The FAST intervention program represents a novel computerized intervention for high-risk youth that strategically targets implicated facial affect sensitivity deficits directly via a computerized real-time automated feedback and incentive system to remediate callous-unemotional tendencies associated with behavioral dysfunction.
Active Comparator: Arm 4: R33 Active Control
Individuals in this Arm will receive the active control component, which is an implicit gaze training intervention.
Behavioral: Implicit Gaze Training task (Active control condition)
This computerized task was developed to target implicit training of eye gaze but not facial emotion recognition per se via real-time feedback and incentives. On each trial, a fixation cross is followed by an emotional face with eyes directed either left, straight ahead, or right (balanced across expressions), followed by a response key. The child's task is to say which direction the eyes are looking (e.g., "1" or "left"). Stimuli are black and white standardized photographs of men and women models from the Ekman Pictures of Facial Affect each displaying the 3 gaze directions for 6 emotion expressions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Facial Emotion Recognition (R61 phase primary milestone measure)
Time Frame: FER will be assessed in each phase (R61 & R33) of the study at pre-treatment (session 1), post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up as well as approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
Recognition of facial emotional expressions will be indexed based on accuracy of matching emotion expressions on the FACES and Dynamic FER tasks.
FER will be assessed in each phase (R61 & R33) of the study at pre-treatment (session 1), post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up as well as approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
Change in Eye Gaze (R61 phase primary milestone measure)
Time Frame: Eye gaze will be assessed in each phase (R61 & R33) of the study at pre-treatment (session 1), post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up as well as approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
Heightened attention to the eye region (eye gaze) will be indexed by primacy, dwell time, and frequency of fixation on the eye region of emotional faces, measured via eye tracking while participants complete the FER task.
Eye gaze will be assessed in each phase (R61 & R33) of the study at pre-treatment (session 1), post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up as well as approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
Change in Callous-Unemotional Traits (R33 phase primary outcome)
Time Frame: CU Traits will be assessed during the the R33 phase at pre-treatment, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up as well as approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
CU traits will be assessed using the Inventory of Callous-Unemotional Traits. There are subscales for callousness, uncaring, and unemotional tendencies. Higher scores reflect higher reported CU traits.
CU Traits will be assessed during the the R33 phase at pre-treatment, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up as well as approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Griffith Empathy Measure Score
Time Frame: GEM will be assessed during the R33 phase at pre-treatment, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow up, and approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
Griffith Empathy Measure (GEM ), is a 23-item parent-report measure of affective (shared emotional state) and cognitive (perspective taking) empathy. The maximum score is 92. Higher scores reflect higher reported empathy.
GEM will be assessed during the R33 phase at pre-treatment, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow up, and approximately every other week during the 5-week intervention.
Change in "I Love You" Task
Time Frame: The "I Love You" task will be administered during the R33 phase at pre-treatment, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow up
The I Love You Task is a dyadic interactional task for young children utilizing a brief emotionally intense parent-child encounter for which reciprocated eye gaze and affection is fundamental.
The "I Love You" task will be administered during the R33 phase at pre-treatment, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow up
Change in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score
Time Frame: CGI will be assessed at eligibility, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up in the R33 phase.
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) score will be determined as a common clinical trial index, with CGI-I improvement scores of 1 or 2 (very much/much improved, based on independent rater score) as being responsive to the intervention.
CGI will be assessed at eligibility, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up in the R33 phase.
Change in Event Related Potential (ERP) signal
Time Frame: ERPs will be assessed at eligibility, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up in both R61 and R33 phases.
Event related potentials that are previously identified neural correlates of early perceptual and emotional processing of facial expressions, specifically, N170 and P200 ERP components, assessed via electroencephalography.
ERPs will be assessed at eligibility, post-treatment (end of 5 weeks), and 3-month follow-up in both R61 and R33 phases.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bradley A White, PhD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MH117192

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Per the Dissemination Plan, the investigators will follow the NIH Policy on Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and University of Alabama's Office for Sponsored Research policy of compliance monitoring (Sponsored Projects Agreements for Human Subjects Research and Human Research Protections).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The investigators will make de-identified data generated through this project available for research purposes to qualified individuals within the scientific community no later than the time of publication of the main findings from the final data set. Additionally, data will be shared with the NIMH Data Archive (NDA) that includes the National Database for Clinical Trials related to Mental Illness (NDCT). The investigators will abide by the data submission schedule given us in the NDA. Data will be provided within the recommended data structures of the NDA. In addition, the study will be registered with ClinicalTrials.gov and will share results with ClinicalTrials.gov within one year of the completion of data collection of the primary outcome measures. Sharing of the data generated by this project will be in accordance with all applicable regulations and guidelines of NIH.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requests for individual participant data (IPD) or other study information will be reviewed by the PI (B. White). He will make determination as to legitimacy of the request and qualifications of the requestor.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings