Comparative Study of Three Different Formulations of Omega-3 (EPA+DHA)

April 28, 2021 updated by: SCF Pharma

Comparative Bioavailability Study of Monoglyceride (MAG) Versus Triglyceride (TG) Versus Ethyl Ester (EE) Formulations of Eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and Docosahexaenoic (DHA) Acids. Pilot Study (IO3-03)

This pilot study aims at comparing the bioavailability of three different formulations of the omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA). The three formulations are ethyl ester (EE), triglyceride (TG) and monoglyceride (MAG). Thirty six (36) subjects will be divided in three groups of twelve subjects each equally divided in two study sites. Each group will be taking one of the three different formulations of EPA+DHA at a daily dose of 1.5g for a period of 12 weeks. Bioavailability will be measured through omega-3 index (total content of EPA + DHA in red blood cell membranes) at baseline and every four weeks during treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This pilot study aims at comparing the bioavailability of three different formulations of a combination of omega-3 fatty acids eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) in a standardized proportion of 460:200. The three formulations are ethyl ester (EE), triglyceride (TG) and monoglyceride (MAG) versions of these fatty acids. The formulations are prepared in a way to be similar in proportion of EPA/DHA, in dose and in appearance. Thirty six (36) subjects will be divided in three groups of twelve subjects each, equally divided in two study sites. The study will be randomized and double blinded. Each group will be taking one of the three different formulations of EPA+DHA at a daily dose of 1.5g for a period of 12 weeks. Bioavailability will be measured through omega-3 index (total content of EPA + DHA in red blood cell membranes) at baseline and every four weeks during treatment. After recruitment, subjects will be seen in clinic every four weeks for a total of four (4) study visits during which a blood sample will be taken for analysis of the omega-3 index, the investigational product will be returned and dispensed and finally, adverse events will be noted and followed. Treatment will be self-administered by subjects at home. They will be asked to keep a journal of adverse events, concomitant medication and to note every missed dose as well as significant changes in life habits (smoking, alcohol, sports, food diet and natural health products intake).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Rimouski, Quebec, Canada, G0K 1P0
        • SCF Pharma

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants of at least 19 years of age.
  • Availability for the entire duration of the study, willingness to participate as evidenced by the informed consent form duly read and signed by the participant.
  • Absence of intellectual problems likely to limit the validity of consent to participate in the study or the compliance with protocol requirements, ability to cooperate adequately, to understand and observe the instructions of the physician or delegates.
  • Participant having no difficulty swallowing tablets or capsules.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or intolerance to fish or history of allergic reaction attributable to fish or to a compound similar to fish oil.
  • Females who are pregnant according to the qualitative pregnancy test or who are lactating.
  • Participants who took omega-3 supplements in the previous 60 days before day 1 of the study.
  • Difficulty to draw blood by capillary puncture at screening.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Basic Science
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Monoglyceride (MAG)
Group A will receive the omega-3 fatty acids in monoglyceride formulation (MAG). Subjects will receive 1.5g per day of MAG-EPA/MAG-DHA in a proportion of 460:200 for 12 consecutive weeks.
Dietary supplement: MAG-EPA/MAG-DHA
monoglyceride of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in proportion of 460:200
Active Comparator: Triglyceride (TG)
Group B will receive the omega-3 fatty acids in triglyceride formulation (TG). Subjects will receive 1.5g per day of TG-EPA/TG-DHA in a proportion of 460:200 for 12 consecutive weeks.
Dietary supplement: TG-EPA/TG-DHA
Triglyceride of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in proportion of 460:200
Active Comparator: Ethyl Ester(EE)
Group C will receive the omega-3 fatty acids in Ethyl ester formulation (EE). Subjects will receive 1.5g per day of EE-EPA/EE-DHA in a proportion of 460:200 for 12 consecutive weeks.
Dietary supplement: EE-EPA/EE-DHA
Ethyl ester of eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid in proportion of 460:200

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparing the bioavailability of the three different formulations of omega-3 fatty acids at study.
Time Frame: 12 weeks per subject
The Omega-3 index (ratio of EPA + DHA content on total fatty acids in red blood cells) will be measured throughout the study (at baseline and every four weeks afterwards) for each subjects. The average value in canadian population is 4.5%, however, for an optimized health, the desired index should be between 8 and 12% of omega-3 in cell membranes. The average omega-3 index curves obtained for each group will be compared to determine which formulation offers the best absorption of omega-3 in the organism.
12 weeks per subject

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence of adverse events in subjects treated with EPA +DHA
Time Frame: 16 weeks per subject
Subjects will be questioned about any changes in their health status throughout the study, and for the 30 days following the end of treatment. All adverse events will recorded and evaluated for severity, causality and expectedness. All serious adverse events will be reported as required.
16 weeks per subject
Compilation of life habits & demographic information
Time Frame: 12 weeks per subject
Demographic information and life habits will be recorded at screening as to draw a portrait of the subjects baseline status. A follow-up of life habits at every visit will be done afterwards as a way to control any possible bias in outcomes.
12 weeks per subject

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
SCF Pharma

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Samuel Fortin, PhD, SCF Pharma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 18, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 25, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 28, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IO3-03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings