Persona MC Retained PCL vs. Persona Posterior-stabilized vs. NexGen PS (Persona TKA)
Comparison of the Persona Medial Congruent Retained Posterior-Cruciate Ligament vs. Persona Posterior-stabilized vs. NexGen Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty a Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Bartosz Maciąg, MD
- Phone Number: 0048 881568144
- Email: bartosz.maciag94@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Warsaw, Poland
- Recruiting
- Department of Othopedics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Warsaw
-
Contact:
- Bartosz M. Maciąg, MD
- Phone Number: +48 881 568 144
- Email: bmaciag@wum.edu.pl
-
Principal Investigator:
- Artur Stolarczyk, MD, PhD
-
Principal Investigator:
- Bartosz M. Maciąg, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Listed for a primary total knee replacement (TKR) at the Orthopaedic and Rehabilitation Department Medical University of Warsaw
- Indication for the TKR is primary osteoarthritis of the knee joint involving one or more compartments
- Aged 18 or over
- Patient willing to provide full informed consent to the trial
Exclusion Criteria:
- Listed for a single-stage bilateral TKR procedure
- Severe symptoms in the contralateral knee so as to require staged bilateral knee replacements within 6 months of the primary procedure
- Fixed flexion deformity of 15 degrees or greater who will require excessive resection of the distal femur
- Clinically assessed uncorrectable varus/valgus deformity of 15 degrees or greater
- Any co-morbidity which, in the opinion of the investigator, is severe enough to present an unacceptable risk to the patient's safety
- Inflammatory arthritis
- Previous septic arthritis in the affected knee joint
- Previous surgery to the collateral ligaments of the affected knee
- A contralateral total knee replacement that has been implanted less than one year from the date of consultation
- A contralateral total knee replacement that is severely painful
- Patients on warfarin or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs)
- Will not be resident in the catchment area for at least 6 months post-surgery
- Undertaking the surgery as a private patient
- Patients who, in the opinion of the clinical staff, do not have capacity to consent
- Patients who are pregnant
- Unable to understand written and spoken Polish
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: NexGen
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Zimmer Biomet NexGen prosthesis
|
Participants will be asked to perform biomechanical assesment before and following surgery at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6-months postoperatively
Participant will undergo total knee replacement performed via anterior parapatellar approach with either Posterior Cruciate Ligament sacrificing or retaining implant
CT scans of the affected knee joint before and after the surgical procedure
Participant are randomly allocated to receive one of the Persona MC Retained PCL, Persona MC Sacrificed PCL and the NexGen PS total knee implant for treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Persona MC Retained PCL
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Zimmer Biomet Persona MC Retained PCL prosthesis
|
Participants will be asked to perform biomechanical assesment before and following surgery at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6-months postoperatively
Participant will undergo total knee replacement performed via anterior parapatellar approach with either Posterior Cruciate Ligament sacrificing or retaining implant
CT scans of the affected knee joint before and after the surgical procedure
Participant are randomly allocated to receive one of the Persona MC Retained PCL, Persona MC Sacrificed PCL and the NexGen PS total knee implant for treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis.
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Persona MC Sacrificed PCL
Patients undergoing total knee replacement for treatment of primary knee ostearthritis with use of Zimmer Biomet Persona MC Sacrificed PCL prosthesis
|
Participants will be asked to perform biomechanical assesment before and following surgery at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6-months postoperatively
Participant will undergo total knee replacement performed via anterior parapatellar approach with either Posterior Cruciate Ligament sacrificing or retaining implant
CT scans of the affected knee joint before and after the surgical procedure
Participant are randomly allocated to receive one of the Persona MC Retained PCL, Persona MC Sacrificed PCL and the NexGen PS total knee implant for treatment of end-stage knee osteoarthritis.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in patients reported outcome measures - Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: baseline (preoperatively) and 6-months postoperatively
|
To explore differences between outcome in patients treated with use of with Nexgen and Persona prosthesis.
Results range from 0 to 48, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
|
baseline (preoperatively) and 6-months postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in patients reported outcome measures - Oxford Knee Score (OKS)
Time Frame: 1 week and 6-8 weeks post-operatively
|
To explore differences between outcome in patients treated with use of with Nexgen and Persona prosthesis.
Results range from 0 to 48, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
|
1 week and 6-8 weeks post-operatively
|
|
Changes in patients reported outcomes - Oxford Knee Score Activity & Participation Questionnaire (OKS_APQ)
Time Frame: 1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post- operatively
|
To explore differences in higher levels of activity and social participation
|
1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post- operatively
|
|
Changes in patients reported outcomes - EuroQol (EQ- 5D-5L)
Time Frame: 1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post- operatively
|
To explore differences in quality of life
|
1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post- operatively
|
|
Changes in patients reported outcomes - Forgotten Joint Score (FJS)
Time Frame: 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To explore differences in patient's ability to forget about a joint as a result of successful treatment.
Results range from 0 to 100, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
|
6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Changes in patients reported outcomes - UCLA (University of California) score
Time Frame: 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To explore differences in patient's physical activity.
Results range from 0 to 10, with higher scores corresponding to better outcomes.
|
6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Changes in knee range of motion
Time Frame: preoperatively, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To explore differences in range of motion (flexion and extension)
|
preoperatively, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Changes in pain medication
Time Frame: 1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To asses evolution of post-operative knee pain
|
1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
arthroplasty related complications
Time Frame: 1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To count and asses all complications that may occur during surgery and in postoperative period
|
1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
arthroplasty revision surgeries
Time Frame: 1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To count and asses the reason of all revision surgeries that may occur during postoperative period
|
1 week, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
walking abilities
Time Frame: 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
To asses "up and go" time
|
6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: from baseline to discharge from hospital ranging averagely from 1 up to 7 days postoperatively
|
To measure number of days counting from surgery to the discharge
|
from baseline to discharge from hospital ranging averagely from 1 up to 7 days postoperatively
|
|
Biomechanical 3D miotion and emg walking outcomes
Time Frame: at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
Overground walking is measured using 3D Motion analysis and electromyography (EMG)
|
at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Radiological outcome on CT scans
Time Frame: at baseline preoperatively and 6-months postoperatively
|
Rotational alignment of the total knee component is assessed by measuring the femoral antetorsion, Alignment of the total knee component is assessed by measuring the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG)
|
at baseline preoperatively and 6-months postoperatively
|
|
6- minute walking abilities
Time Frame: 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
to asses pace and model of 6-minute walk
|
6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Biomechanical stair climbing outcomes
Time Frame: at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
Stair climbing and descending is measured using 3D Motion analysis and EMG
|
at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Biomechanical static balance outcomes
Time Frame: at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
Static balance is measured using a force plate
|
at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Biomechanical dynamic balance outcomes
Time Frame: at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
Dynamic balance is measured using a force plate and the modified Star Excursion Balance Test (mSEBT)
|
at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
|
Leg muscle strength outcomes
Time Frame: at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
Leg muscle strength measured using maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC) test of the hamstring and quadriceps muscles on both limbs.
|
at baseline, 6-8 weeks and 6 months post-operatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Artur Stolarczyk, PhD, Medical University of Warsaw
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- WarszawMU
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.