Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of US Guided ESP Block With Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

December 19, 2022 updated by: Magdy Mohammed Mahdy Sayed, Assiut University

Comparison of Analgesic Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Erector Spinae Plane Block With Port Site Infiltration Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

To compare the efficacy of ultrasonography (USG)-guided bilateral Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with port-site infiltration using bupivacaine for post-operative analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with a hypothesis that both Erector spinae plane block and port-site infiltration are effective in providing post-operative analgesia.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
44

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Asyut Governorate
      • Assiut, Asyut Governorate, Egypt, 11111
        • Assiut University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 56 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II,
  • Age between 18 and 60 years with a body mass index (BMI) of 18-35 kg/m2,
  • Patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy to local anaesthetics,

  • Infection at the site of injection,

    •, Coagulopathy,

  • Chronic pain syndromes,
  • Prolonged opioid medication,
  • Patients who received any analgesic 24 h before surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Erector spinae plane block
ultrasound guided ESP Block after anaesthesia induction
Procedure: Erector spinae plane block
Patients will be placed on their right side. A high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be placed in a longitudinal parasagittal orientation 2.5-3 cm lateral to the T9 spinous process. The erector spinae muscles will be identified superficial to the tip of the T9 transverse process. A 21G 10-cm needle will be inserted using an in-plane approach in a cranial to caudal direction. The tip of the needle will be placed into the fascial plane on the deep aspect of the erector spinae muscle. The location of the needle tip will be confirmed by visible fluid spread lifting the erector spinae muscle off the bony shadow of the transverse process on ultrasonographic imaging. A volume of 20 mL of LA mixture (10 mL of bupivacaine 0.5%, 5 mL of lidocaine 2% and 5 mL of normal saline to make a mixture totaling 20 ml.) will be injected. The same procedure will be repeated for the opposite side.
Other Names:
  • ESP block
Device: Ultrasound machine (Mindray DP 9900 plus; Mindray Bio-Medical Electronics, Shenzhen, China)
Ultrasound will be used to identify the erector spinae muscles and to guide the LA mixture injection.
Drug: Bupivacaine 0.5%
Bupivacaine 0.5% will be included in the injected LA mixture.
Drug: Lidocaine 2%
Lidocaine 2% will be included in the injected LA mixture.
Active Comparator: Port site infiltration technique
After the induction of anaesthesia, pre-incisional port-site infiltration will be performed by the same surgeon every time with 20 ml of Local anesthetic (LA) mixture that will be divided equally between port sites
Drug: Bupivacaine 0.5%
Bupivacaine 0.5% will be included in the injected LA mixture.
Drug: Lidocaine 2%
Lidocaine 2% will be included in the injected LA mixture.
Procedure: Port site infiltration
After the induction of anaesthesia, pre-incisional port-site infiltration will be performed by the same surgeon every time with 20 ml of the LA mixture. The volume will be divided equally between port sites. A total of four ports-supraumbilical, subxiphoid and two ports in the right subcostal area at mid-clavicular and anterior axillary line will be made.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total postoperative opioid consumption.
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Nalbuphine consumption in mg.(equivalent to morphine dose)
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain scores;Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at rest and when coughing
Time Frame: at 1, 2,4 , 8, 16 and 24 hours postoperatively.
The NRS is a segmented numeric version of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in which a respondent selects a whole number (0-10 integers).
at 1, 2,4 , 8, 16 and 24 hours postoperatively.
•Cumulative postoperative analgesic consumption
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Analgesic drug consumption other than nalbuphine in mg.
24 hours postoperatively
•Heart Rate (HR)
Time Frame: Intraoperatively at 0, 5,10, 20, and 30 minutes. Then every 15 min thereafter till the end of surgery
Heart Rate in beats /min
Intraoperatively at 0, 5,10, 20, and 30 minutes. Then every 15 min thereafter till the end of surgery
•Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP)
Time Frame: Intraoperatively at 0, 5,10, 20, and 30 minutes. Then every 15 min thereafter till the end of surgery
Mean Arterial Pressure in mmHg
Intraoperatively at 0, 5,10, 20, and 30 minutes. Then every 15 min thereafter till the end of surgery
Incidence and severity Postoperative nausea & vomiting (PONV).
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Number of patients developing PONV & PONV Score; (1) No nausea or vomiting, (2) only nausea but no vomiting, (3) single episode of vomiting or persistent nausea, and (4) two or more episodes of vomiting or severe retching.
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assiut University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 17, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 19, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ABC-3-DE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings