Comparison of Percutaneous Closure to Manual Compression for Hemostasis

January 7, 2022 updated by: Michael S. Lloyd

A Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Closure to Manual Compression for Hemostasis of Multiple Venous Access Sites Among Patients Undergoing Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

This a prospective randomized trial occurring in patients undergoing routine ablation for atrial fibrillation as standard of care. The purpose of this study is to determine if using a small internal suture (or "stitch") facilitates faster times to hemostasis (stopping bleeding) after removing intravenous sheaths (special IVs that are used for ablation procedures) after an atrial fibrillation ablation procedure. The device used to place the stitch is PerClose Proglide and is an already FDA-approved technology for closing these IV sites. The study will also determine if it is safe to get up and walk sooner than what is considered typical after closing these IV sites with the PerClose device. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either manual compression or use of the PerClose for hemostasis at the end of the ablation procedure. The length of follow-up will be up to 30 days at routine clinical follow-up after the procedure.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Radiofrequency ablation and cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) using percutaneous venous access at the groin is one of the most common procedures performed by cardiac electrophysiologists. However, compared to other catheter-based interventions, patients undergoing AF ablation pose a unique set of challenges. First, AF ablation requires multiple points of transfemoral venous access with large diameter sheaths, ranging in size from 8 French gauge (F) to 14F for cryoablation procedures. Second, operators are forced to balance the competing risk of thrombosis and bleeding in these patients. In order to minimize the risk of intraprocedural thrombosis, anticoagulation with heparin with a goal anticoagulation time (ACT) >300-350 seconds is necessary. However, operators typically require ACTs to normalize prior to removal of sheaths and manual compression, which significantly delays hemostasis and ambulation. While reversal agents are an option, there is currently clinical equipoise on their role and safety in this setting and they require additional time to exert their full effect. Lastly, patients require at least 1-2 months of therapeutic oral anticoagulation after the procedure to mitigate ongoing stroke risk. These factors culminate in longer times to hemostasis and ambulation and raise concerns for post-procedure access related complications for patients undergoing AF ablation. PerClose Proglide has recently gained FDA approval for closure of percutaneous venous access sites for catheter-based interventions and remains the only commercially available solution for access sites >14F inner diameter. Percutaneous closure of venotomy sites may facilitate rapid hemostasis without the need for reversal of anticoagulation, potentially attenuating bleeding risk. Additionally, typical bedrest times after percutaneous closure are based on data derived from arterial closure. Prior limited data, as well as frequent anecdotal reports, have suggested that earlier ambulation may be feasible. Because the venous circulation is a lower pressure system, it is possible that earlier than standard ambulation times after PerClose is both safe and feasible. However, a rigorous prospective investigation of the PerClose Proglide device in the context of AF ablation has not been performed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
109

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
        • Emory University Hospital Midtown
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory Clinic, Emory University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • undergoing elective atrial fibrillation ablation at Emory University Hospital or Emory University Hospital Midtown

Exclusion Criteria:

  • women who are pregnant (based on standard pre-procedure pregnancy test)
  • patients who are not able to ambulate pre-procedure
  • patients who are unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Percutaneous Closure
Participants randomized to undergo percutaneous closure with PerClose after radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Device: Percutaneous Closure
The PerClose Proglide system will be used to deliver a suture to close the venous puncture following completion of ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Other Names:
  • PerClose Proglide
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Manual Compression
Participants randomized to undergo manual compression after radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation.
Other: Manual Compression
Manual compression is the standard method of attaining hemostasis following ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation. Manual compression may be performed with or without "figure of eight" suture for hemostasis at the discretion of the treating physician).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Hemostasis
Time Frame: Day 1
Starting from sheath pull, time (in minutes) to hemostasis will be compared between study arms.
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Ambulation
Time Frame: Day 1
Time to ambulation (in minutes) following the atrial fibrillation ablation, will be compared between study arms.
Day 1
Number of Complications
Time Frame: Day 30
Number of complications will be compared between study arms as a composite of all major access site complications and venous thromboembolism.
Day 30
Short-form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire Score
Time Frame: Day 30
The Short-form Inguinal Pain Questionnaire is a quality of life metric where respondents report how much pain they have experienced in the past week and how pain has limited their activities. The questionnaire consists of two items, each with a score ranging from 0 to 6. Question 1 asks participants to report the worst pain they have experienced in the past week, where responses range from 0 (no pain) to 6 (pain present, prompt medical advice sought). If participants have experienced pain, Question 2 asks what limitations the pain has caused in performing everyday activities such as sitting down, standing up, or exercising. The total score for question 2 ranges from 0 (none of the listed activities were impacted) to 6 (all listed activities were impacted).
Day 30
Procedure Length
Time Frame: Day 1
The length of the procedure to reach hemostasis, in minutes, will be compared between study arms.
Day 1
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Day 1 and Day 30
Patient satisfaction was assessed with a 6-item instrument where participants responded on a scale from 0 to 5 where 0 = completely satisfied and 5 = completely dissatisfied. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 30 and lower scores indicate greater satisfaction with pain level and appearance of the access site. Measurements were taken at discharge (day 1) and the same instrument was used on follow up (day 30).
Day 1 and Day 30
Pain Medication Needs
Time Frame: Day 1
Post-procedure narcotic usage for pain medication requirements after hemostasis until discharge from the post-procedure area will be compared between study arms.
Day 1
Costs
Time Frame: Day 30
Overall costs (in dollars) related to hemostasis and any complications over 30 days will be compared between study arms.
Day 30
Number of Nursing Encounters
Time Frame: Day 1
The number of nursing encounters while in the post-procedure area will be compared between study arms.
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Michael S. Lloyd

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Abbott

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 22, 2020

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 13, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 13, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2019

First Posted (ACTUAL)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 27, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 7, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 7, 2022

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • IRB00115958

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings