ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT (ERASE)
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-A Randomized Control Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Odisha
-
Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, 751019
- Tushar S Mishra
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient diagnosed with peptic perforation intra -operatively
- Perforation of size <=1 cm
- Patient age more than 18 years
- American Society of Anesthesiologists score of I or II
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refractory septic shock at presentation.
- Known Chronic kidney disease/ Chronic liver disease patients
- Pregnant patients.
- Patients with history of chronic steroid abuse.
Intraoperatively
- Patient with coexistent peptic perforation with bleeding ulcer.
- Peptic perforation requiring procedure other than Omental patch repair.
- Sealed perforations.
- Malignant perforation.
- Patient requiring Positive Pressure Ventilator support post operatively for more than 12 hours.
- Patient requiring urinary catheterization for other indications.
- Coexistent neurological or psychiatric illness or unable to understand the study.
- Patient refusing for consent.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Enhanced recovery after surgery group
ERAS GROUP
|
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Conventional group
CONVENTIONAL GROUP
I |
Tracheal intubation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Post operative period up-to one month.
|
Duration from the time of operation to time of discharge
|
Post operative period up-to one month.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Recovery of functional parameters
Time Frame: Post operative period up-to one month.
|
|
Post operative period up-to one month.
|
|
Post operative complications
Time Frame: Post operative period up-to three months.
|
|
Post operative period up-to three months.
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Quality of life scoring and assessment
Time Frame: Post operative period - at day of discharge, at one month follow up and at third month follow up.
|
Quality of life assessment will be done using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (Euroqol 5 dimensions and 5 levels).
It has 2 components, descriptive and objective.
Descriptive component comprises of 5 dimensions which are mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Each dimension has 5 levels, namely no problem, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems.
Objective component is also called Euroqol visual analog scale.
Score ranges from zero to hundred.The endpoints are labelled as 'the best health participant can imagine' and 'the worst health participant can imagine'.
It will be assessed on the day of discharge, follow up at one month and follow up at third month in the post operative period.
|
Post operative period - at day of discharge, at one month follow up and at third month follow up.
|
|
Intra-abdominal collection
Time Frame: Post operative period-at one month and at third month in post operative period.
|
Ultrasonography abdomen will be done at one month to look for any intra-abdominal collection and if any collection is found, will be repeated at third month follow up.
|
Post operative period-at one month and at third month in post operative period.
|
|
Hematological parameter
Time Frame: Post-operative period up-at one month and at third month.
|
Total leukocyte count will be measured at follow up at one month.If the value is more than 11,000 cells/mm cube or less than 4000 cells/mm cube, then it will be measured again at third month of follow up.
|
Post-operative period up-at one month and at third month.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: TUSHAR S MISHRA, MBBS,MS, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Gonenc M, Dural AC, Celik F, Akarsu C, Kocatas A, Kalayci MU, Dogan Y, Alis H. Enhanced postoperative recovery pathways in emergency surgery: a randomised controlled clinical trial. Am J Surg. 2014 Jun;207(6):807-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.025. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
- Mohsina S, Shanmugam D, Sureshkumar S, Kundra P, Mahalakshmy T, Kate V. Adapted ERAS Pathway vs. Standard Care in Patients with Perforated Duodenal Ulcer-a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Jan;22(1):107-116. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3474-2. Epub 2017 Jun 26.
- Lohsiriwat V, Jitmungngan R. Enhanced recovery after surgery in emergency colorectal surgery: Review of literature and current practices. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb 27;11(2):41-52. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v11.i2.41.
- Agarwal A, Jain S, Meena LN, Jain SA, Agarwal L. Validation of Boey's score in predicting morbidity and mortality in peptic perforation peritonitis in Northwestern India. Trop Gastroenterol. 2015 Oct-Dec;36(4):256-60. doi: 10.7869/tg.300.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- AIIMS BBSR/PGT/2019-20/65
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.