Identification of Neoatherosclerosis in ISR Patients Based on Artifical Intelligence

January 13, 2021 updated by: Yun Dai Chen, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Identification of Neoatherosclerosis in In-stent Restenosis Patients Based on Artifical Intelligence

Based on the large population of patients, in-stent restenosis (ISR) is still an important problem in the field of cardiovascular disease. How to reduce the incidence of ISR and the treatment of ISR has become the focus and hot spot. The 2018 ESC Guidelines for Cardiovascular Intervention recommends treatment of ISR under the guidance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), or optical coherent tomography (OCT). Circulation published a new Waksman ISR classification based on mechanisms and components of the restenosis tissue, which provides guidance for treatment strategy. Because of its good resolution, OCT makes it more accurate to distinguish the components of vascular tissue, thus providing a decision-making basis for interventional therapy. OCT examination can obtain the characteristics of the ISR more precisely. Neoatherosclerosis (NA), is one of the ISR types and accounts for more stent failure and target lesion failure than other types. Identification NA is important for decision-making of interventional therapy. However, the acquisition and analysis of OCT images not only need the digital angiography machine (DSA) equipped with the majority of hospitals, but also need professional OCT imaging equipment and technicians. Patients with severely CKD cannot bear OCT examination because of the large amount of contrast agent. OCT catheter is more than ten times the price of the CAG catheter. Therefore, identification of NA by the use of artificial intelligence (AI) is of significance to set therapeutic strategy for ISR patients, especially in patients with CKD. Our study retrospectively analyzed CAG images and OCT images of ISR patients obtained from Jan 1st,2015 to Oct 31st,2020. Identify NA by analyzing OCT images, build up U-net and V-net to analyze the CAG and OCT images, and finally build up an identification system of NA based on CAG images by AI. This study has been approved by Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2018-033-01)

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Drug Eluting Stents (DES) reduce the rate of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to 3.6-10%. Based on the large population of patients, ISR is still an important problem in the field of cardiovascular disease. How to reduce the incidence of ISR and the treatment of ISR has become the focus and hot spot. The 2018 ESC Guidelines for Cardiovascular Intervention recommends treatment of ISR under the guidance of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), or optical coherent tomography (OCT). The European Expert Consensus on Intravascular Imaging, published in 2018, recommends finding the underlying mechanisms of ISR through intravascular imaging guidance (IVUS or OCT), and determining therapeutic strategies based on the mechanisms. Circulation published a new Waksman ISR classification based on mechanisms and components of the restenosis tissue, which provides guidance of treatment strategy. The use of intravascular imaging to identify and classify the types and mechanisms is very important for ISR treatment strategy. Because of its good resolution, OCT makes it more accurate to distinguish the components of vascular tissue, thus providing a decision-making basis for interventional therapy. OCT examination can obtain the characteristics of ISR more precisely. Neoatherosclerosis (NA), is one of the ISR types and accounts for more stent failure and target lesion failure than other types. Identification of NA is important for decision-making of interventional therapy. However, the acquisition and analysis of OCT images not only need the digital angiography machine (DSA) equipped with the majority of hospitals, but also need professional OCT imaging equipment and technicians. Patients with severely CKD cannot bear OCT examination because of the large amount of contrast agent. OCT catheter is more than ten times the price of the CAG catheter. Therefore, identification of NA by the use of artificial intelligence (AI) is of significance to set therapeutic strategy for ISR patients, especially in patients with CKD. Our study retrospectively analyzed CAG images and OCT images of ISR patients obtained from Jan 1st,2015 to Jan 31st,2020. Offline OCT analysis was performed using dedicated software (Light Lab Imaging Inc, Westford, MA). All images were analyzed at every frame in the stents by 2 independent investigators, who were blinded to the angiographic and clinical findings. Identify NA by analyzing OCT images, build up U-net and V-net to analyze the CAG and OCT images, and finally build up an identification system of NA based on CAG images by AI. This study has been approved by Ethics Committee of Chinese PLA General Hospital (S2018-033-01)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Yingqian Zhang, M.D
  • Phone Number: 15652505966 15652505966
  • Email: niniya731@163.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Hui Hui, PH.D
  • Phone Number: 010-55499309 010-55499309
  • Email: hui.hui@is.ac.cn

Study Locations

  • China
      • Beijing, China, 100853
        • Recruiting
        • The General Hospital of PLA
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

100 patients were enrolled

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- all gender

18ys old to 80ys old

diagnosed of in-stent restenosis based on CAG

both CAG images and OCT images were obtained in the same patient on the same day

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CAG images and OCT images were not obtained on the same day in the same patient

low quality in CAG images

low qualitiy in OCT images

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
CAG and OCT group
Images of CAG and OCT patients obtained from ISR patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
Other: no interventin
Our stusy analysed the images obtained from ISR patients, no extra intervention was given based on this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The identification of NA
Time Frame: through the study completion, an average of 3 years
a neointima containing a diffuse border and a signal-poor region, with the struts underneath invisible because of the marked signal attenuation
through the study completion, an average of 3 years
neovascularizaion
Time Frame: through the study completion, an average of 3 years
diameter 50-300um, cavity in the stent area, not connected with the vasular
through the study completion, an average of 3 years
ISR segment in the CAG images
Time Frame: through the study completion, an average of 3 years
the segement in the stent area or within 5mm beside the stent,diameter stenosis rate>50%
through the study completion, an average of 3 years
lipid-core arc
Time Frame: through the study completion, an average of 3 years
To quantify the circumferential extent of NA, the lipid-core arc was measured at a 0.2-mm interval throughout the segments showing NA.
through the study completion, an average of 3 years
Thin-cap fibroatheroma-like neointima
Time Frame: through the study completion, an average of 3 years
defined as a neointima characterized by a fibrous cap thickness at the thinnest part of <65 μm and an angle of lipid-laden neointima of >180 degrees
through the study completion, an average of 3 years
macrophage arc
Time Frame: through the study completion, an average of 3 years
measured at 0.2-mm intervals and divided into 5 groups: grade 0, no macrophages; grade 1, localized macrophage accumulation, <30 degrees; grade 2, clustered accumulation, ≥30 and <90 degrees; grade 3, clustered accumulation, ≥90 and <270 degrees; and grade 4, clustered accumulation, ≥270 degrees.
through the study completion, an average of 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chinese PLA General Hospital

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Yundai Chen, M.D, Chinese PLA General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 31, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 28, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 21, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 15, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AI-301-ISR

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings